Cargando…

Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs. Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Initial Treatment After Birth in Extremely Preterm Infants

OBJECTIVE: Non-invasive respiratory support strategies are known to reduce the complications of invasive mechanical ventilation in preterm infants. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) are commonly used ones. The recent meta-a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kostekci, Yasemin Ezgi, Okulu, Emel, Bakirarar, Batuhan, Kraja, Elvis, Erdeve, Omer, Atasay, Begum, Arsan, Saadet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9082746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35547537
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.870125
_version_ 1784703271657537536
author Kostekci, Yasemin Ezgi
Okulu, Emel
Bakirarar, Batuhan
Kraja, Elvis
Erdeve, Omer
Atasay, Begum
Arsan, Saadet
author_facet Kostekci, Yasemin Ezgi
Okulu, Emel
Bakirarar, Batuhan
Kraja, Elvis
Erdeve, Omer
Atasay, Begum
Arsan, Saadet
author_sort Kostekci, Yasemin Ezgi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Non-invasive respiratory support strategies are known to reduce the complications of invasive mechanical ventilation in preterm infants. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) are commonly used ones. The recent meta-analyses indicated that early NIPPV did appear to be superior to NCPAP for decreasing respiratory failure and the need for intubation among preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The aim of the study was to compare the short-term outcomes of extremely preterm infants who received NCPAP or NIPPV as an initial treatment of RDS. METHODS: This retrospective study included infants born before 29 weeks' gestation between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021 who received non-invasive respiratory support with NCPAP or NIPPV. For every infant included in the cohort, only the first episode of NCPAP or NIPPV as initial treatment was evaluated. The primary outcome was the need for intubation within 72 h, and the secondary outcomes were the need for intubation within 7 days, administration of surfactant, prematurity-related morbidities, mortality, and death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). RESULTS: During the study period, there were 116 inborn admissions of preterm infants born <29 weeks' gestation and 60 of them met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 31 (52%) infants received NCPAP while 29 (48%) infants received NIPPV at the first hours after birth. There were no differences in the baseline demographics between the groups (p > 0.05). Blood gas parameters (pH, pCO(2), HCO3, and lactate) at admission were not different. The need for intubation within 72 h as the primary outcome was similar between NCPAP and NIPPV groups (35.5 vs. 34.5%, p = 0.935). The rates of surfactant requirement, need for intubation within 7 days, prematurity-related morbidities, mortality, and death/BPD were similar among the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation is non-inferior to NCPAP as an initial treatment in extremely preterm infants with RDS. Although the rate of intubation in the first week, mortality, and BPD did not differ between groups, additional studies are needed and the synchronization of NIPPV should be evaluated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9082746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90827462022-05-10 Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs. Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Initial Treatment After Birth in Extremely Preterm Infants Kostekci, Yasemin Ezgi Okulu, Emel Bakirarar, Batuhan Kraja, Elvis Erdeve, Omer Atasay, Begum Arsan, Saadet Front Pediatr Pediatrics OBJECTIVE: Non-invasive respiratory support strategies are known to reduce the complications of invasive mechanical ventilation in preterm infants. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) are commonly used ones. The recent meta-analyses indicated that early NIPPV did appear to be superior to NCPAP for decreasing respiratory failure and the need for intubation among preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The aim of the study was to compare the short-term outcomes of extremely preterm infants who received NCPAP or NIPPV as an initial treatment of RDS. METHODS: This retrospective study included infants born before 29 weeks' gestation between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021 who received non-invasive respiratory support with NCPAP or NIPPV. For every infant included in the cohort, only the first episode of NCPAP or NIPPV as initial treatment was evaluated. The primary outcome was the need for intubation within 72 h, and the secondary outcomes were the need for intubation within 7 days, administration of surfactant, prematurity-related morbidities, mortality, and death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). RESULTS: During the study period, there were 116 inborn admissions of preterm infants born <29 weeks' gestation and 60 of them met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 31 (52%) infants received NCPAP while 29 (48%) infants received NIPPV at the first hours after birth. There were no differences in the baseline demographics between the groups (p > 0.05). Blood gas parameters (pH, pCO(2), HCO3, and lactate) at admission were not different. The need for intubation within 72 h as the primary outcome was similar between NCPAP and NIPPV groups (35.5 vs. 34.5%, p = 0.935). The rates of surfactant requirement, need for intubation within 7 days, prematurity-related morbidities, mortality, and death/BPD were similar among the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation is non-inferior to NCPAP as an initial treatment in extremely preterm infants with RDS. Although the rate of intubation in the first week, mortality, and BPD did not differ between groups, additional studies are needed and the synchronization of NIPPV should be evaluated. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9082746/ /pubmed/35547537 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.870125 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kostekci, Okulu, Bakirarar, Kraja, Erdeve, Atasay and Arsan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Kostekci, Yasemin Ezgi
Okulu, Emel
Bakirarar, Batuhan
Kraja, Elvis
Erdeve, Omer
Atasay, Begum
Arsan, Saadet
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs. Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Initial Treatment After Birth in Extremely Preterm Infants
title Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs. Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Initial Treatment After Birth in Extremely Preterm Infants
title_full Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs. Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Initial Treatment After Birth in Extremely Preterm Infants
title_fullStr Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs. Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Initial Treatment After Birth in Extremely Preterm Infants
title_full_unstemmed Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs. Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Initial Treatment After Birth in Extremely Preterm Infants
title_short Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs. Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Initial Treatment After Birth in Extremely Preterm Infants
title_sort nasal continuous positive airway pressure vs. nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as initial treatment after birth in extremely preterm infants
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9082746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35547537
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.870125
work_keys_str_mv AT kostekciyaseminezgi nasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurevsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasinitialtreatmentafterbirthinextremelypreterminfants
AT okuluemel nasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurevsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasinitialtreatmentafterbirthinextremelypreterminfants
AT bakirararbatuhan nasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurevsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasinitialtreatmentafterbirthinextremelypreterminfants
AT krajaelvis nasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurevsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasinitialtreatmentafterbirthinextremelypreterminfants
AT erdeveomer nasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurevsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasinitialtreatmentafterbirthinextremelypreterminfants
AT atasaybegum nasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurevsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasinitialtreatmentafterbirthinextremelypreterminfants
AT arsansaadet nasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurevsnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationasinitialtreatmentafterbirthinextremelypreterminfants