Cargando…
Lessons learnt when accounting for competing events in the external validation of time-to-event prognostic models
BACKGROUND: External validation of prognostic models is necessary to assess the accuracy and generalizability of the model to new patients. If models are validated in a setting in which competing events occur, these competing risks should be accounted for when comparing predicted risks to observed o...
Autores principales: | Ramspek, Chava L, Teece, Lucy, Snell, Kym I E, Evans, Marie, Riley, Richard D, van Smeden, Maarten, van Geloven, Nan, van Diepen, Merel |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9082803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34919691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyab256 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Prediction meets causal inference: the role of treatment in clinical prediction models
por: van Geloven, Nan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
External validation of prognostic models: what, why, how, when and where?
por: Ramspek, Chava L, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Prediction models for the mortality risk in chronic dialysis patients: a systematic review and independent external validation study
por: Ramspek, Chava L, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Towards the best kidney failure prediction tool: a systematic review and selection aid
por: Ramspek, Chava L, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Prediction or causality? A scoping review of their conflation within current observational research
por: Ramspek, Chava L., et al.
Publicado: (2021)