Cargando…

Characteristics of Frailty in Haemodialysis Patients

Background: Both frailty and cachexia increase mortality in haemodialysis (HD) patients. The clinical frailty score (CFS) is a seven-point scale and less complex than other cachexia and frailty assessments. We wished to determine the characteristics of frail HD patients using the CFS. Methods: Singl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hendra, Heidy, Sridharan, Sivakumar, Farrington, Ken, Davenport, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9083032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35548325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23337214221098889
_version_ 1784703332362747904
author Hendra, Heidy
Sridharan, Sivakumar
Farrington, Ken
Davenport, Andrew
author_facet Hendra, Heidy
Sridharan, Sivakumar
Farrington, Ken
Davenport, Andrew
author_sort Hendra, Heidy
collection PubMed
description Background: Both frailty and cachexia increase mortality in haemodialysis (HD) patients. The clinical frailty score (CFS) is a seven-point scale and less complex than other cachexia and frailty assessments. We wished to determine the characteristics of frail HD patients using the CFS. Methods: Single centre cross-sectional study of HD patients completing physical activity questionnaires with bioimpedance measurements of body composition and hand grip strength (HGS). Results: We studied 172 HD patients. The CFS classified 54 (31.4%) as frail, who were older (70.4±12.2 vs 56.2 ± 16.1 years, p < 0.001), greater modified Charlson co-morbidity (3 (2–3) versus 1.5 (0–3), p < 0.001), and body fat (33 (25.4–40.2) versus 26.2 (15.8–34) %, p < 0.01), but lower total energy expenditure (1720 (1574–1818) versus 1870 (1670–2194) kcal/day, p < 0.01), lean muscle mass index (9.1 (7.7–10.1) versus 9.9 (8.9–10.8) kg/m2), and HGS (15.3 (10.3–21.9) versus 23.6 (16.7–34.4) kg), both p < 0.001. On multivariable logistic analysis, frailty was independently associated with lower active energy expenditure (odds ratio (OR) 0.98, 95% confidence limits (CL) 0.98–0.99, p = 0.001), diabetes (OR 5.09, CL 1.06–16.66) and HGS (OR 0.92, CL 0.86–0.98). Discussion: Frail HD patients reported less active energy expenditure, associated with reduced muscle mass and strength. Frail patients were more likely to have greater co-morbidity, particularly diabetes. Whether physical activity programmes can improve frailty remains to be determined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9083032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90830322022-05-10 Characteristics of Frailty in Haemodialysis Patients Hendra, Heidy Sridharan, Sivakumar Farrington, Ken Davenport, Andrew Gerontol Geriatr Med Brief Report Background: Both frailty and cachexia increase mortality in haemodialysis (HD) patients. The clinical frailty score (CFS) is a seven-point scale and less complex than other cachexia and frailty assessments. We wished to determine the characteristics of frail HD patients using the CFS. Methods: Single centre cross-sectional study of HD patients completing physical activity questionnaires with bioimpedance measurements of body composition and hand grip strength (HGS). Results: We studied 172 HD patients. The CFS classified 54 (31.4%) as frail, who were older (70.4±12.2 vs 56.2 ± 16.1 years, p < 0.001), greater modified Charlson co-morbidity (3 (2–3) versus 1.5 (0–3), p < 0.001), and body fat (33 (25.4–40.2) versus 26.2 (15.8–34) %, p < 0.01), but lower total energy expenditure (1720 (1574–1818) versus 1870 (1670–2194) kcal/day, p < 0.01), lean muscle mass index (9.1 (7.7–10.1) versus 9.9 (8.9–10.8) kg/m2), and HGS (15.3 (10.3–21.9) versus 23.6 (16.7–34.4) kg), both p < 0.001. On multivariable logistic analysis, frailty was independently associated with lower active energy expenditure (odds ratio (OR) 0.98, 95% confidence limits (CL) 0.98–0.99, p = 0.001), diabetes (OR 5.09, CL 1.06–16.66) and HGS (OR 0.92, CL 0.86–0.98). Discussion: Frail HD patients reported less active energy expenditure, associated with reduced muscle mass and strength. Frail patients were more likely to have greater co-morbidity, particularly diabetes. Whether physical activity programmes can improve frailty remains to be determined. SAGE Publications 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9083032/ /pubmed/35548325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23337214221098889 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Hendra, Heidy
Sridharan, Sivakumar
Farrington, Ken
Davenport, Andrew
Characteristics of Frailty in Haemodialysis Patients
title Characteristics of Frailty in Haemodialysis Patients
title_full Characteristics of Frailty in Haemodialysis Patients
title_fullStr Characteristics of Frailty in Haemodialysis Patients
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of Frailty in Haemodialysis Patients
title_short Characteristics of Frailty in Haemodialysis Patients
title_sort characteristics of frailty in haemodialysis patients
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9083032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35548325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23337214221098889
work_keys_str_mv AT hendraheidy characteristicsoffrailtyinhaemodialysispatients
AT sridharansivakumar characteristicsoffrailtyinhaemodialysispatients
AT farringtonken characteristicsoffrailtyinhaemodialysispatients
AT davenportandrew characteristicsoffrailtyinhaemodialysispatients