Cargando…
Non-invasive stimulation of the social brain: the methodological challenges
Use of non-invasive brain stimulation methods (NIBS) has become a common approach to study social processing in addition to behavioural, imaging and lesion studies. However, research using NIBS to investigate social processing faces challenges. Overcoming these is important to allow valid and reliab...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9083106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32734295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa102 |
_version_ | 1784703349476556800 |
---|---|
author | Penton, Tegan Catmur, Caroline Banissy, Michael J Bird, Geoffrey Walsh, Vincent |
author_facet | Penton, Tegan Catmur, Caroline Banissy, Michael J Bird, Geoffrey Walsh, Vincent |
author_sort | Penton, Tegan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Use of non-invasive brain stimulation methods (NIBS) has become a common approach to study social processing in addition to behavioural, imaging and lesion studies. However, research using NIBS to investigate social processing faces challenges. Overcoming these is important to allow valid and reliable interpretation of findings in neurotypical cohorts, but also to allow us to tailor NIBS protocols to atypical groups with social difficulties. In this review, we consider the utility of brain stimulation as a technique to study and modulate social processing. We also discuss challenges that face researchers using NIBS to study social processing in neurotypical adults with a view to highlighting potential solutions. Finally, we discuss additional challenges that face researchers using NIBS to study and modulate social processing in atypical groups. These are important to consider given that NIBS protocols are rarely tailored to atypical groups before use. Instead, many rely on protocols designed for neurotypical adults despite differences in brain function that are likely to impact response to NIBS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9083106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90831062022-05-09 Non-invasive stimulation of the social brain: the methodological challenges Penton, Tegan Catmur, Caroline Banissy, Michael J Bird, Geoffrey Walsh, Vincent Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Manuscript Use of non-invasive brain stimulation methods (NIBS) has become a common approach to study social processing in addition to behavioural, imaging and lesion studies. However, research using NIBS to investigate social processing faces challenges. Overcoming these is important to allow valid and reliable interpretation of findings in neurotypical cohorts, but also to allow us to tailor NIBS protocols to atypical groups with social difficulties. In this review, we consider the utility of brain stimulation as a technique to study and modulate social processing. We also discuss challenges that face researchers using NIBS to study social processing in neurotypical adults with a view to highlighting potential solutions. Finally, we discuss additional challenges that face researchers using NIBS to study and modulate social processing in atypical groups. These are important to consider given that NIBS protocols are rarely tailored to atypical groups before use. Instead, many rely on protocols designed for neurotypical adults despite differences in brain function that are likely to impact response to NIBS. Oxford University Press 2020-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9083106/ /pubmed/32734295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa102 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Manuscript Penton, Tegan Catmur, Caroline Banissy, Michael J Bird, Geoffrey Walsh, Vincent Non-invasive stimulation of the social brain: the methodological challenges |
title | Non-invasive stimulation of the social brain: the methodological challenges |
title_full | Non-invasive stimulation of the social brain: the methodological challenges |
title_fullStr | Non-invasive stimulation of the social brain: the methodological challenges |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-invasive stimulation of the social brain: the methodological challenges |
title_short | Non-invasive stimulation of the social brain: the methodological challenges |
title_sort | non-invasive stimulation of the social brain: the methodological challenges |
topic | Original Manuscript |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9083106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32734295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pentontegan noninvasivestimulationofthesocialbrainthemethodologicalchallenges AT catmurcaroline noninvasivestimulationofthesocialbrainthemethodologicalchallenges AT banissymichaelj noninvasivestimulationofthesocialbrainthemethodologicalchallenges AT birdgeoffrey noninvasivestimulationofthesocialbrainthemethodologicalchallenges AT walshvincent noninvasivestimulationofthesocialbrainthemethodologicalchallenges |