Cargando…

Influence of Jaw Setting in the Determination of Stereotactic Small-Field Output Factors with Different Detectors

BACKGROUND: The experimental determination of relative output factors presents the greatest challenge, especially for small fields with different detectors. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of jaw positions on small-field output factors for the fields defined by micro-multileaf col...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: George, Seby, Ponmalar, Y. Retna, Godson, Henry Finlay, Kumar, A. Sathish, Ravindran, B. Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9084590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35548030
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_111_21
_version_ 1784703642246316032
author George, Seby
Ponmalar, Y. Retna
Godson, Henry Finlay
Kumar, A. Sathish
Ravindran, B. Paul
author_facet George, Seby
Ponmalar, Y. Retna
Godson, Henry Finlay
Kumar, A. Sathish
Ravindran, B. Paul
author_sort George, Seby
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The experimental determination of relative output factors presents the greatest challenge, especially for small fields with different detectors. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of jaw positions on small-field output factors for the fields defined by micro-multileaf collimator and circular cones with different detectors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The stereotactic output factors were measured on Primus linear accelerator with BrainLab micro-multileaf collimator (mMLC) and circular cones as add-on tertiary collimators. Square field sizes ranging from 0.6 cm × 0.6 cm to 9.8 cm × 9.8 cm and circular fields of diameter ranging from 1.0 cm to 4.0 cm were defined by mMLC and circular cones, respectively. The influence of jaw position on output factor was assessed for different geometric configurations with three different detectors. RESULTS: The values obtained with PinPoint ion chamber were consistent with microDiamond detector for fields greater than 24 mm × 24 mm, but an underestimation of 23.9% was noticed in 6 mm x 6 mm field size. For the mMLC defined field size of 6 mm × 6 mm, when the X-Y jaw was moved from 8 mm × 8 mm to 80 mm × 80 mm, an increase in the output by a factor of 1.7 was observed with both microDiamond and stereotactic radiosurgery diode, whereas an increase in output by a factor of 1.9 was noticed with PinPoint ion chamber. CONCLUSION: Output factors obtained with different detectors show high differences in the smallest field size for all collimating systems. This study confirms that the position of X and Y jaw above the tertiary collimator significantly influences the small-field output factor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9084590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90845902022-05-10 Influence of Jaw Setting in the Determination of Stereotactic Small-Field Output Factors with Different Detectors George, Seby Ponmalar, Y. Retna Godson, Henry Finlay Kumar, A. Sathish Ravindran, B. Paul J Med Phys Original Article BACKGROUND: The experimental determination of relative output factors presents the greatest challenge, especially for small fields with different detectors. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of jaw positions on small-field output factors for the fields defined by micro-multileaf collimator and circular cones with different detectors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The stereotactic output factors were measured on Primus linear accelerator with BrainLab micro-multileaf collimator (mMLC) and circular cones as add-on tertiary collimators. Square field sizes ranging from 0.6 cm × 0.6 cm to 9.8 cm × 9.8 cm and circular fields of diameter ranging from 1.0 cm to 4.0 cm were defined by mMLC and circular cones, respectively. The influence of jaw position on output factor was assessed for different geometric configurations with three different detectors. RESULTS: The values obtained with PinPoint ion chamber were consistent with microDiamond detector for fields greater than 24 mm × 24 mm, but an underestimation of 23.9% was noticed in 6 mm x 6 mm field size. For the mMLC defined field size of 6 mm × 6 mm, when the X-Y jaw was moved from 8 mm × 8 mm to 80 mm × 80 mm, an increase in the output by a factor of 1.7 was observed with both microDiamond and stereotactic radiosurgery diode, whereas an increase in output by a factor of 1.9 was noticed with PinPoint ion chamber. CONCLUSION: Output factors obtained with different detectors show high differences in the smallest field size for all collimating systems. This study confirms that the position of X and Y jaw above the tertiary collimator significantly influences the small-field output factor. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9084590/ /pubmed/35548030 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_111_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Medical Physics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
George, Seby
Ponmalar, Y. Retna
Godson, Henry Finlay
Kumar, A. Sathish
Ravindran, B. Paul
Influence of Jaw Setting in the Determination of Stereotactic Small-Field Output Factors with Different Detectors
title Influence of Jaw Setting in the Determination of Stereotactic Small-Field Output Factors with Different Detectors
title_full Influence of Jaw Setting in the Determination of Stereotactic Small-Field Output Factors with Different Detectors
title_fullStr Influence of Jaw Setting in the Determination of Stereotactic Small-Field Output Factors with Different Detectors
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Jaw Setting in the Determination of Stereotactic Small-Field Output Factors with Different Detectors
title_short Influence of Jaw Setting in the Determination of Stereotactic Small-Field Output Factors with Different Detectors
title_sort influence of jaw setting in the determination of stereotactic small-field output factors with different detectors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9084590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35548030
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_111_21
work_keys_str_mv AT georgeseby influenceofjawsettinginthedeterminationofstereotacticsmallfieldoutputfactorswithdifferentdetectors
AT ponmalaryretna influenceofjawsettinginthedeterminationofstereotacticsmallfieldoutputfactorswithdifferentdetectors
AT godsonhenryfinlay influenceofjawsettinginthedeterminationofstereotacticsmallfieldoutputfactorswithdifferentdetectors
AT kumarasathish influenceofjawsettinginthedeterminationofstereotacticsmallfieldoutputfactorswithdifferentdetectors
AT ravindranbpaul influenceofjawsettinginthedeterminationofstereotacticsmallfieldoutputfactorswithdifferentdetectors