Cargando…

A solution-processed tin dioxide film applicable as a transparent and flexible humidity sensor

An all-solution-processed transparent tin oxide (SnO(2))-based humidity sensor was directly prepared on borosilicate glass (SnO(2)–G) and a flexible polyethylene terephthalate (SnO(2)–PET) substrate without using a template. The entire process included film deposition by a spin-spray process at 90 °...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Hwai-En, Katayanagi, Yuta, Kishi, Tetsuo, Yano, Tetsuji, Matsushita, Nobuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9085436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35546836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra04355h
Descripción
Sumario:An all-solution-processed transparent tin oxide (SnO(2))-based humidity sensor was directly prepared on borosilicate glass (SnO(2)–G) and a flexible polyethylene terephthalate (SnO(2)–PET) substrate without using a template. The entire process included film deposition by a spin-spray process at 90 °C and subsequent hot water treatment (HWT) at 100 °C. The resistivity of the films dramatically decreased and had semiconductor characteristics after the HWT, even though the as-prepared SnO(2)–G and SnO(2)–PET samples were insulators. Based on the results, the variation of the resistivity could be attributed to the formation of a hydroxyl layer on the crystallized SnO(2) surface. With the help of the HWT on the SnO(2) films, the formation of tin hydroxyl derivatives provided mobile protons, which led to the variation of the electrical properties of SnO(2) at ambient conditions with different humidities. The sensitivity of the SnO(2)–G-HWT and SnO(2)–PET-HWT at 95% relative humidity (RH) was 35.2 and 3.5 times higher, respectively, than that at 5% RH. Both the sensitivity of the SnO(2)–G-HWT and SnO(2)–PET-HWT samples showed a good uptrend corresponding to the increase of RH at 20 ± 1 °C, and the response/recovery time of SnO(2)–G-HWT and SnO(2)–PET-HWT was 51/38 s and 69/47 s in the % RH range of 30–70% at 20 ± 1 °C, respectively.