Cargando…

Age-stratified outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a randomized setting (LAP-01): do younger patients have more to lose?

OBJECTIVE: Age is known to have an impact on outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, age differences can be investigated from a cross-sectional as well as from a longitudinal perspective. This study combines both perspectives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: LAP-01 is the first multicenter random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holze, Sigrun, Bräunlich, Max, Mende, Meinhard, Arthanareeswaran, Vinodh-Kumar-Adithyaa, Neuhaus, Petra, Truss, Michael C., Do, Hoang Minh, Dietel, Anja, Franz, Toni, Teber, Dogu, Heilsberg, Ann-Kathrin, Hohenfellner, Markus, Rabenalt, Robert, Albers, Peter, Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9085667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35124734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03945-0
_version_ 1784703868208152576
author Holze, Sigrun
Bräunlich, Max
Mende, Meinhard
Arthanareeswaran, Vinodh-Kumar-Adithyaa
Neuhaus, Petra
Truss, Michael C.
Do, Hoang Minh
Dietel, Anja
Franz, Toni
Teber, Dogu
Heilsberg, Ann-Kathrin
Hohenfellner, Markus
Rabenalt, Robert
Albers, Peter
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
author_facet Holze, Sigrun
Bräunlich, Max
Mende, Meinhard
Arthanareeswaran, Vinodh-Kumar-Adithyaa
Neuhaus, Petra
Truss, Michael C.
Do, Hoang Minh
Dietel, Anja
Franz, Toni
Teber, Dogu
Heilsberg, Ann-Kathrin
Hohenfellner, Markus
Rabenalt, Robert
Albers, Peter
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
author_sort Holze, Sigrun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Age is known to have an impact on outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, age differences can be investigated from a cross-sectional as well as from a longitudinal perspective. This study combines both perspectives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: LAP-01 is the first multicenter randomized patient blinded trial comparing outcomes after robotic-assisted and laparoscopic RP. This study stratified the entire population that received nerve-sparing surgery and was potent at baseline by the following ages: ≤ 60 years, 61–65 years, and > 65 years. Potency was assessed using the IIEF-5. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was used for global health perception and the EORTC QLQ-PR25 for urinary symptoms. Continence was assessed by the number of pads used. Longitudinal change was assessed using either validated anchor-based criteria or the 1 or 0.5-standard-deviation criterion. Worsening of continence was measured by increasing numbers of pads. RESULTS: 310 patients were included into this study. Older patients had a significantly higher risk for worsening of continence at 3 and 6 months (OR 2.21, 95% CI [1.22, 4.02], p = 0.009 and OR 2.00, 95% CI [1.16, 3.46], p = 0.013, respectively); at 12 months, the odds of worsening did not differ significantly between age groups. Potency scores were better in younger patients from a cross-sectional perspective, but longitudinal change did not differ between the age groups. In contrast, global health perception was better in older patients from a cross-sectional perspective and longitudinal decreases were significantly more common among the youngest patients, at 12 months (36.9% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: From a cross-sectional perspective, function scores were better in younger patients, but from a longitudinal perspective, age differences were found in continence only. In contrast, global health scores were better in older patients from a cross-sectional and longitudinal perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The LAP-01 trial was registered with the U.S. National Library of Medicine clinical trial registry (clinicaltrials.gov), NCT number: NCT03682146, and with the German Clinical Trial registry (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien), DRKS ID number: DRKS00007138. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-022-03945-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9085667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90856672022-05-11 Age-stratified outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a randomized setting (LAP-01): do younger patients have more to lose? Holze, Sigrun Bräunlich, Max Mende, Meinhard Arthanareeswaran, Vinodh-Kumar-Adithyaa Neuhaus, Petra Truss, Michael C. Do, Hoang Minh Dietel, Anja Franz, Toni Teber, Dogu Heilsberg, Ann-Kathrin Hohenfellner, Markus Rabenalt, Robert Albers, Peter Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe World J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Age is known to have an impact on outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, age differences can be investigated from a cross-sectional as well as from a longitudinal perspective. This study combines both perspectives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: LAP-01 is the first multicenter randomized patient blinded trial comparing outcomes after robotic-assisted and laparoscopic RP. This study stratified the entire population that received nerve-sparing surgery and was potent at baseline by the following ages: ≤ 60 years, 61–65 years, and > 65 years. Potency was assessed using the IIEF-5. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was used for global health perception and the EORTC QLQ-PR25 for urinary symptoms. Continence was assessed by the number of pads used. Longitudinal change was assessed using either validated anchor-based criteria or the 1 or 0.5-standard-deviation criterion. Worsening of continence was measured by increasing numbers of pads. RESULTS: 310 patients were included into this study. Older patients had a significantly higher risk for worsening of continence at 3 and 6 months (OR 2.21, 95% CI [1.22, 4.02], p = 0.009 and OR 2.00, 95% CI [1.16, 3.46], p = 0.013, respectively); at 12 months, the odds of worsening did not differ significantly between age groups. Potency scores were better in younger patients from a cross-sectional perspective, but longitudinal change did not differ between the age groups. In contrast, global health perception was better in older patients from a cross-sectional perspective and longitudinal decreases were significantly more common among the youngest patients, at 12 months (36.9% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: From a cross-sectional perspective, function scores were better in younger patients, but from a longitudinal perspective, age differences were found in continence only. In contrast, global health scores were better in older patients from a cross-sectional and longitudinal perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The LAP-01 trial was registered with the U.S. National Library of Medicine clinical trial registry (clinicaltrials.gov), NCT number: NCT03682146, and with the German Clinical Trial registry (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien), DRKS ID number: DRKS00007138. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-022-03945-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9085667/ /pubmed/35124734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03945-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Holze, Sigrun
Bräunlich, Max
Mende, Meinhard
Arthanareeswaran, Vinodh-Kumar-Adithyaa
Neuhaus, Petra
Truss, Michael C.
Do, Hoang Minh
Dietel, Anja
Franz, Toni
Teber, Dogu
Heilsberg, Ann-Kathrin
Hohenfellner, Markus
Rabenalt, Robert
Albers, Peter
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
Age-stratified outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a randomized setting (LAP-01): do younger patients have more to lose?
title Age-stratified outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a randomized setting (LAP-01): do younger patients have more to lose?
title_full Age-stratified outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a randomized setting (LAP-01): do younger patients have more to lose?
title_fullStr Age-stratified outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a randomized setting (LAP-01): do younger patients have more to lose?
title_full_unstemmed Age-stratified outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a randomized setting (LAP-01): do younger patients have more to lose?
title_short Age-stratified outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a randomized setting (LAP-01): do younger patients have more to lose?
title_sort age-stratified outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a randomized setting (lap-01): do younger patients have more to lose?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9085667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35124734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03945-0
work_keys_str_mv AT holzesigrun agestratifiedoutcomesafterradicalprostatectomyinarandomizedsettinglap01doyoungerpatientshavemoretolose
AT braunlichmax agestratifiedoutcomesafterradicalprostatectomyinarandomizedsettinglap01doyoungerpatientshavemoretolose
AT mendemeinhard agestratifiedoutcomesafterradicalprostatectomyinarandomizedsettinglap01doyoungerpatientshavemoretolose
AT arthanareeswaranvinodhkumaradithyaa agestratifiedoutcomesafterradicalprostatectomyinarandomizedsettinglap01doyoungerpatientshavemoretolose
AT neuhauspetra agestratifiedoutcomesafterradicalprostatectomyinarandomizedsettinglap01doyoungerpatientshavemoretolose
AT trussmichaelc agestratifiedoutcomesafterradicalprostatectomyinarandomizedsettinglap01doyoungerpatientshavemoretolose
AT dohoangminh agestratifiedoutcomesafterradicalprostatectomyinarandomizedsettinglap01doyoungerpatientshavemoretolose
AT dietelanja agestratifiedoutcomesafterradicalprostatectomyinarandomizedsettinglap01doyoungerpatientshavemoretolose
AT franztoni agestratifiedoutcomesafterradicalprostatectomyinarandomizedsettinglap01doyoungerpatientshavemoretolose
AT teberdogu agestratifiedoutcomesafterradicalprostatectomyinarandomizedsettinglap01doyoungerpatientshavemoretolose
AT heilsbergannkathrin agestratifiedoutcomesafterradicalprostatectomyinarandomizedsettinglap01doyoungerpatientshavemoretolose
AT hohenfellnermarkus agestratifiedoutcomesafterradicalprostatectomyinarandomizedsettinglap01doyoungerpatientshavemoretolose
AT rabenaltrobert agestratifiedoutcomesafterradicalprostatectomyinarandomizedsettinglap01doyoungerpatientshavemoretolose
AT alberspeter agestratifiedoutcomesafterradicalprostatectomyinarandomizedsettinglap01doyoungerpatientshavemoretolose
AT stolzenburgjensuwe agestratifiedoutcomesafterradicalprostatectomyinarandomizedsettinglap01doyoungerpatientshavemoretolose