Cargando…

Analytical study of two feature extraction methods in comparison with deep learning methods for classification of small metal objects

This paper addresses the efficiency of two feature extraction methods for classifying small metal objects including screws, nuts, keys, and coins: the histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) and local binary pattern (LBP). The desired features for the labeled images are first extracted and saved in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amraee, Somaieh, Chinipardaz, Maryam, Charoosaei, Mohammadali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Nature Singapore 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9085991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35534747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42492-022-00111-6
_version_ 1784703929981861888
author Amraee, Somaieh
Chinipardaz, Maryam
Charoosaei, Mohammadali
author_facet Amraee, Somaieh
Chinipardaz, Maryam
Charoosaei, Mohammadali
author_sort Amraee, Somaieh
collection PubMed
description This paper addresses the efficiency of two feature extraction methods for classifying small metal objects including screws, nuts, keys, and coins: the histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) and local binary pattern (LBP). The desired features for the labeled images are first extracted and saved in the form of a feature matrix. Using three different classification methods (non-parametric K-nearest neighbors algorithm, support vector machine, and naïve Bayesian method), the images are classified into four different classes. Then, by examining the resulting confusion matrix, the performances of the HOG and LBP approaches are compared for these four classes. The effectiveness of these two methods is also compared with the “You Only Look Once” and faster region-based convolutional neural network approaches, which are based on deep learning. The collected image set in this paper includes 800 labeled training images and 180 test images. The results show that the use of the HOG is more efficient than the use of the LBP. Moreover, a combination of the HOG and LBP provides better results than either alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9085991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Nature Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90859912022-05-11 Analytical study of two feature extraction methods in comparison with deep learning methods for classification of small metal objects Amraee, Somaieh Chinipardaz, Maryam Charoosaei, Mohammadali Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art Original Article This paper addresses the efficiency of two feature extraction methods for classifying small metal objects including screws, nuts, keys, and coins: the histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) and local binary pattern (LBP). The desired features for the labeled images are first extracted and saved in the form of a feature matrix. Using three different classification methods (non-parametric K-nearest neighbors algorithm, support vector machine, and naïve Bayesian method), the images are classified into four different classes. Then, by examining the resulting confusion matrix, the performances of the HOG and LBP approaches are compared for these four classes. The effectiveness of these two methods is also compared with the “You Only Look Once” and faster region-based convolutional neural network approaches, which are based on deep learning. The collected image set in this paper includes 800 labeled training images and 180 test images. The results show that the use of the HOG is more efficient than the use of the LBP. Moreover, a combination of the HOG and LBP provides better results than either alone. Springer Nature Singapore 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9085991/ /pubmed/35534747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42492-022-00111-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Amraee, Somaieh
Chinipardaz, Maryam
Charoosaei, Mohammadali
Analytical study of two feature extraction methods in comparison with deep learning methods for classification of small metal objects
title Analytical study of two feature extraction methods in comparison with deep learning methods for classification of small metal objects
title_full Analytical study of two feature extraction methods in comparison with deep learning methods for classification of small metal objects
title_fullStr Analytical study of two feature extraction methods in comparison with deep learning methods for classification of small metal objects
title_full_unstemmed Analytical study of two feature extraction methods in comparison with deep learning methods for classification of small metal objects
title_short Analytical study of two feature extraction methods in comparison with deep learning methods for classification of small metal objects
title_sort analytical study of two feature extraction methods in comparison with deep learning methods for classification of small metal objects
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9085991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35534747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42492-022-00111-6
work_keys_str_mv AT amraeesomaieh analyticalstudyoftwofeatureextractionmethodsincomparisonwithdeeplearningmethodsforclassificationofsmallmetalobjects
AT chinipardazmaryam analyticalstudyoftwofeatureextractionmethodsincomparisonwithdeeplearningmethodsforclassificationofsmallmetalobjects
AT charoosaeimohammadali analyticalstudyoftwofeatureextractionmethodsincomparisonwithdeeplearningmethodsforclassificationofsmallmetalobjects