Cargando…

Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections

Background: Targeted malaria elimination strategies require highly sensitive tests to detect low density malaria infections (LDMI). Commonly used methods for malaria diagnosis such as light microscopy and antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are not sensitive enough for reliable identificatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christensen, Peter, Bozdech, Zbynek, Watthanaworawit, Wanitda, Imwong, Mallika, Rénia, Laurent, Malleret, Benoît, Ling, Clare, Nosten, François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9086519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592834
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16564.3
_version_ 1784704020932198400
author Christensen, Peter
Bozdech, Zbynek
Watthanaworawit, Wanitda
Imwong, Mallika
Rénia, Laurent
Malleret, Benoît
Ling, Clare
Nosten, François
author_facet Christensen, Peter
Bozdech, Zbynek
Watthanaworawit, Wanitda
Imwong, Mallika
Rénia, Laurent
Malleret, Benoît
Ling, Clare
Nosten, François
author_sort Christensen, Peter
collection PubMed
description Background: Targeted malaria elimination strategies require highly sensitive tests to detect low density malaria infections (LDMI). Commonly used methods for malaria diagnosis such as light microscopy and antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are not sensitive enough for reliable identification of infections with parasitaemia below 200 parasites per milliliter of blood. While targeted malaria elimination efforts on the Thailand-Myanmar border have successfully used high sample volume ultrasensitive quantitative PCR (uPCR) to determine malaria prevalence, the necessity for venous collection and processing of large quantities of patient blood limits the widespread tractability of this method. Methods: Here we evaluated a real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) method that reduces the required sample volume compared to uPCR. To do this, 304 samples collected from an active case detection program in Kayin state, Myanmar were compared using uPCR and RT-qPCR. Results: Plasmodium spp. RT-qPCR confirmed 18 of 21 uPCR Plasmodium falciparum positives, while P. falciparum specific RT-qPCR confirmed 17 of the 21 uPCR P. falciparum positives. Combining both RT-qPCR results increased the sensitivity to 100% and specificity was 95.1%. Conclusion: Malaria detection in areas of low transmission and LDMI can benefit from the increased sensitivity of ribosomal RNA detection by RT-PCR, especially where sample volume is limited. Isolation of high quality RNA also allows for downstream analysis of malaria transcripts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9086519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90865192022-05-18 Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections Christensen, Peter Bozdech, Zbynek Watthanaworawit, Wanitda Imwong, Mallika Rénia, Laurent Malleret, Benoît Ling, Clare Nosten, François Wellcome Open Res Research Article Background: Targeted malaria elimination strategies require highly sensitive tests to detect low density malaria infections (LDMI). Commonly used methods for malaria diagnosis such as light microscopy and antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are not sensitive enough for reliable identification of infections with parasitaemia below 200 parasites per milliliter of blood. While targeted malaria elimination efforts on the Thailand-Myanmar border have successfully used high sample volume ultrasensitive quantitative PCR (uPCR) to determine malaria prevalence, the necessity for venous collection and processing of large quantities of patient blood limits the widespread tractability of this method. Methods: Here we evaluated a real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) method that reduces the required sample volume compared to uPCR. To do this, 304 samples collected from an active case detection program in Kayin state, Myanmar were compared using uPCR and RT-qPCR. Results: Plasmodium spp. RT-qPCR confirmed 18 of 21 uPCR Plasmodium falciparum positives, while P. falciparum specific RT-qPCR confirmed 17 of the 21 uPCR P. falciparum positives. Combining both RT-qPCR results increased the sensitivity to 100% and specificity was 95.1%. Conclusion: Malaria detection in areas of low transmission and LDMI can benefit from the increased sensitivity of ribosomal RNA detection by RT-PCR, especially where sample volume is limited. Isolation of high quality RNA also allows for downstream analysis of malaria transcripts. F1000 Research Limited 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9086519/ /pubmed/35592834 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16564.3 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Christensen P et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Christensen, Peter
Bozdech, Zbynek
Watthanaworawit, Wanitda
Imwong, Mallika
Rénia, Laurent
Malleret, Benoît
Ling, Clare
Nosten, François
Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections
title Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections
title_full Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections
title_fullStr Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections
title_full_unstemmed Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections
title_short Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections
title_sort reverse transcription pcr to detect low density malaria infections
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9086519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592834
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16564.3
work_keys_str_mv AT christensenpeter reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections
AT bozdechzbynek reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections
AT watthanaworawitwanitda reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections
AT imwongmallika reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections
AT renialaurent reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections
AT malleretbenoit reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections
AT lingclare reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections
AT nostenfrancois reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections