Cargando…
Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections
Background: Targeted malaria elimination strategies require highly sensitive tests to detect low density malaria infections (LDMI). Commonly used methods for malaria diagnosis such as light microscopy and antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are not sensitive enough for reliable identificatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9086519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592834 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16564.3 |
_version_ | 1784704020932198400 |
---|---|
author | Christensen, Peter Bozdech, Zbynek Watthanaworawit, Wanitda Imwong, Mallika Rénia, Laurent Malleret, Benoît Ling, Clare Nosten, François |
author_facet | Christensen, Peter Bozdech, Zbynek Watthanaworawit, Wanitda Imwong, Mallika Rénia, Laurent Malleret, Benoît Ling, Clare Nosten, François |
author_sort | Christensen, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Targeted malaria elimination strategies require highly sensitive tests to detect low density malaria infections (LDMI). Commonly used methods for malaria diagnosis such as light microscopy and antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are not sensitive enough for reliable identification of infections with parasitaemia below 200 parasites per milliliter of blood. While targeted malaria elimination efforts on the Thailand-Myanmar border have successfully used high sample volume ultrasensitive quantitative PCR (uPCR) to determine malaria prevalence, the necessity for venous collection and processing of large quantities of patient blood limits the widespread tractability of this method. Methods: Here we evaluated a real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) method that reduces the required sample volume compared to uPCR. To do this, 304 samples collected from an active case detection program in Kayin state, Myanmar were compared using uPCR and RT-qPCR. Results: Plasmodium spp. RT-qPCR confirmed 18 of 21 uPCR Plasmodium falciparum positives, while P. falciparum specific RT-qPCR confirmed 17 of the 21 uPCR P. falciparum positives. Combining both RT-qPCR results increased the sensitivity to 100% and specificity was 95.1%. Conclusion: Malaria detection in areas of low transmission and LDMI can benefit from the increased sensitivity of ribosomal RNA detection by RT-PCR, especially where sample volume is limited. Isolation of high quality RNA also allows for downstream analysis of malaria transcripts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9086519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90865192022-05-18 Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections Christensen, Peter Bozdech, Zbynek Watthanaworawit, Wanitda Imwong, Mallika Rénia, Laurent Malleret, Benoît Ling, Clare Nosten, François Wellcome Open Res Research Article Background: Targeted malaria elimination strategies require highly sensitive tests to detect low density malaria infections (LDMI). Commonly used methods for malaria diagnosis such as light microscopy and antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are not sensitive enough for reliable identification of infections with parasitaemia below 200 parasites per milliliter of blood. While targeted malaria elimination efforts on the Thailand-Myanmar border have successfully used high sample volume ultrasensitive quantitative PCR (uPCR) to determine malaria prevalence, the necessity for venous collection and processing of large quantities of patient blood limits the widespread tractability of this method. Methods: Here we evaluated a real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) method that reduces the required sample volume compared to uPCR. To do this, 304 samples collected from an active case detection program in Kayin state, Myanmar were compared using uPCR and RT-qPCR. Results: Plasmodium spp. RT-qPCR confirmed 18 of 21 uPCR Plasmodium falciparum positives, while P. falciparum specific RT-qPCR confirmed 17 of the 21 uPCR P. falciparum positives. Combining both RT-qPCR results increased the sensitivity to 100% and specificity was 95.1%. Conclusion: Malaria detection in areas of low transmission and LDMI can benefit from the increased sensitivity of ribosomal RNA detection by RT-PCR, especially where sample volume is limited. Isolation of high quality RNA also allows for downstream analysis of malaria transcripts. F1000 Research Limited 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9086519/ /pubmed/35592834 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16564.3 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Christensen P et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Christensen, Peter Bozdech, Zbynek Watthanaworawit, Wanitda Imwong, Mallika Rénia, Laurent Malleret, Benoît Ling, Clare Nosten, François Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections |
title | Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections |
title_full | Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections |
title_fullStr | Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections |
title_full_unstemmed | Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections |
title_short | Reverse transcription PCR to detect low density malaria infections |
title_sort | reverse transcription pcr to detect low density malaria infections |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9086519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592834 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16564.3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christensenpeter reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections AT bozdechzbynek reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections AT watthanaworawitwanitda reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections AT imwongmallika reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections AT renialaurent reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections AT malleretbenoit reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections AT lingclare reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections AT nostenfrancois reversetranscriptionpcrtodetectlowdensitymalariainfections |