Cargando…

Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development

BACKGROUND: The Military Health System must develop and sustain experienced surgical trauma teams while facing decreased surgical volumes both during and between deployments. Military trauma resources may enhance local trauma systems by accepting civilian patients for care at military treatment faci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Blair C, McEvoy, Christian S, Ross-Li, Dan, Norris, Emily A, Tadlock, Matthew D, Shackelford, Stacy A, Jensen, Shane D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9086679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2021-000832
_version_ 1784704058704003072
author Lee, Blair C
McEvoy, Christian S
Ross-Li, Dan
Norris, Emily A
Tadlock, Matthew D
Shackelford, Stacy A
Jensen, Shane D
author_facet Lee, Blair C
McEvoy, Christian S
Ross-Li, Dan
Norris, Emily A
Tadlock, Matthew D
Shackelford, Stacy A
Jensen, Shane D
author_sort Lee, Blair C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Military Health System must develop and sustain experienced surgical trauma teams while facing decreased surgical volumes both during and between deployments. Military trauma resources may enhance local trauma systems by accepting civilian patients for care at military treatment facilities (MTFs). Some MTFs may be able to augment their regional trauma systems by developing trauma center (TC) capabilities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the geographical proximity of MTFs to the continental US (CONUS) population and relative to existing civilian adult TCs, and then to determine which MTFs might benefit most from TC development. METHODS: Publicly available data were used to develop a list of CONUS adult civilian level 1 and level 2 TCs and also to generate a list of CONUS MTFs. Census data were used to estimate adult population densities across zip codes. Distances were calculated between zip codes and civilian TCs and MTFs. The affected population sizes and reductions in distance were tabulated for every zip code that was found to be closer to an MTF than an existing TC. RESULTS: 562 civilian adult level 1 and level 2 TCs and 33 military medical centers and hospitals were identified. Compared with their closest civilian TCs, MTFs showed mean reductions in distance ranging from 0 to 30 miles, affecting populations ranging from 12 000 to over 900 000 adults. Seven MTFs were identified that would offer clinically significant reductions in distance to relatively large population centers. DISCUSSION: Some MTFs may offer decreased transit times and improved care to large adult populations within their regional trauma systems by developing level 1 or level 2 TC capabilities. The results of this study provide recommendations to focus further study on seven MTFs to identify those that merit further development and integration with their local trauma systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9086679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90866792022-05-20 Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development Lee, Blair C McEvoy, Christian S Ross-Li, Dan Norris, Emily A Tadlock, Matthew D Shackelford, Stacy A Jensen, Shane D Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Research BACKGROUND: The Military Health System must develop and sustain experienced surgical trauma teams while facing decreased surgical volumes both during and between deployments. Military trauma resources may enhance local trauma systems by accepting civilian patients for care at military treatment facilities (MTFs). Some MTFs may be able to augment their regional trauma systems by developing trauma center (TC) capabilities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the geographical proximity of MTFs to the continental US (CONUS) population and relative to existing civilian adult TCs, and then to determine which MTFs might benefit most from TC development. METHODS: Publicly available data were used to develop a list of CONUS adult civilian level 1 and level 2 TCs and also to generate a list of CONUS MTFs. Census data were used to estimate adult population densities across zip codes. Distances were calculated between zip codes and civilian TCs and MTFs. The affected population sizes and reductions in distance were tabulated for every zip code that was found to be closer to an MTF than an existing TC. RESULTS: 562 civilian adult level 1 and level 2 TCs and 33 military medical centers and hospitals were identified. Compared with their closest civilian TCs, MTFs showed mean reductions in distance ranging from 0 to 30 miles, affecting populations ranging from 12 000 to over 900 000 adults. Seven MTFs were identified that would offer clinically significant reductions in distance to relatively large population centers. DISCUSSION: Some MTFs may offer decreased transit times and improved care to large adult populations within their regional trauma systems by developing level 1 or level 2 TC capabilities. The results of this study provide recommendations to focus further study on seven MTFs to identify those that merit further development and integration with their local trauma systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9086679/ /pubmed/35602974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2021-000832 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Lee, Blair C
McEvoy, Christian S
Ross-Li, Dan
Norris, Emily A
Tadlock, Matthew D
Shackelford, Stacy A
Jensen, Shane D
Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development
title Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development
title_full Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development
title_fullStr Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development
title_full_unstemmed Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development
title_short Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development
title_sort building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9086679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2021-000832
work_keys_str_mv AT leeblairc buildingtraumacapabilityusinggeospatialanalysistoconsidermilitarytreatmentfacilitiesfortraumacenterdevelopment
AT mcevoychristians buildingtraumacapabilityusinggeospatialanalysistoconsidermilitarytreatmentfacilitiesfortraumacenterdevelopment
AT rosslidan buildingtraumacapabilityusinggeospatialanalysistoconsidermilitarytreatmentfacilitiesfortraumacenterdevelopment
AT norrisemilya buildingtraumacapabilityusinggeospatialanalysistoconsidermilitarytreatmentfacilitiesfortraumacenterdevelopment
AT tadlockmatthewd buildingtraumacapabilityusinggeospatialanalysistoconsidermilitarytreatmentfacilitiesfortraumacenterdevelopment
AT shackelfordstacya buildingtraumacapabilityusinggeospatialanalysistoconsidermilitarytreatmentfacilitiesfortraumacenterdevelopment
AT jensenshaned buildingtraumacapabilityusinggeospatialanalysistoconsidermilitarytreatmentfacilitiesfortraumacenterdevelopment