Cargando…
Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development
BACKGROUND: The Military Health System must develop and sustain experienced surgical trauma teams while facing decreased surgical volumes both during and between deployments. Military trauma resources may enhance local trauma systems by accepting civilian patients for care at military treatment faci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9086679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2021-000832 |
_version_ | 1784704058704003072 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Blair C McEvoy, Christian S Ross-Li, Dan Norris, Emily A Tadlock, Matthew D Shackelford, Stacy A Jensen, Shane D |
author_facet | Lee, Blair C McEvoy, Christian S Ross-Li, Dan Norris, Emily A Tadlock, Matthew D Shackelford, Stacy A Jensen, Shane D |
author_sort | Lee, Blair C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Military Health System must develop and sustain experienced surgical trauma teams while facing decreased surgical volumes both during and between deployments. Military trauma resources may enhance local trauma systems by accepting civilian patients for care at military treatment facilities (MTFs). Some MTFs may be able to augment their regional trauma systems by developing trauma center (TC) capabilities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the geographical proximity of MTFs to the continental US (CONUS) population and relative to existing civilian adult TCs, and then to determine which MTFs might benefit most from TC development. METHODS: Publicly available data were used to develop a list of CONUS adult civilian level 1 and level 2 TCs and also to generate a list of CONUS MTFs. Census data were used to estimate adult population densities across zip codes. Distances were calculated between zip codes and civilian TCs and MTFs. The affected population sizes and reductions in distance were tabulated for every zip code that was found to be closer to an MTF than an existing TC. RESULTS: 562 civilian adult level 1 and level 2 TCs and 33 military medical centers and hospitals were identified. Compared with their closest civilian TCs, MTFs showed mean reductions in distance ranging from 0 to 30 miles, affecting populations ranging from 12 000 to over 900 000 adults. Seven MTFs were identified that would offer clinically significant reductions in distance to relatively large population centers. DISCUSSION: Some MTFs may offer decreased transit times and improved care to large adult populations within their regional trauma systems by developing level 1 or level 2 TC capabilities. The results of this study provide recommendations to focus further study on seven MTFs to identify those that merit further development and integration with their local trauma systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9086679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90866792022-05-20 Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development Lee, Blair C McEvoy, Christian S Ross-Li, Dan Norris, Emily A Tadlock, Matthew D Shackelford, Stacy A Jensen, Shane D Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Research BACKGROUND: The Military Health System must develop and sustain experienced surgical trauma teams while facing decreased surgical volumes both during and between deployments. Military trauma resources may enhance local trauma systems by accepting civilian patients for care at military treatment facilities (MTFs). Some MTFs may be able to augment their regional trauma systems by developing trauma center (TC) capabilities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the geographical proximity of MTFs to the continental US (CONUS) population and relative to existing civilian adult TCs, and then to determine which MTFs might benefit most from TC development. METHODS: Publicly available data were used to develop a list of CONUS adult civilian level 1 and level 2 TCs and also to generate a list of CONUS MTFs. Census data were used to estimate adult population densities across zip codes. Distances were calculated between zip codes and civilian TCs and MTFs. The affected population sizes and reductions in distance were tabulated for every zip code that was found to be closer to an MTF than an existing TC. RESULTS: 562 civilian adult level 1 and level 2 TCs and 33 military medical centers and hospitals were identified. Compared with their closest civilian TCs, MTFs showed mean reductions in distance ranging from 0 to 30 miles, affecting populations ranging from 12 000 to over 900 000 adults. Seven MTFs were identified that would offer clinically significant reductions in distance to relatively large population centers. DISCUSSION: Some MTFs may offer decreased transit times and improved care to large adult populations within their regional trauma systems by developing level 1 or level 2 TC capabilities. The results of this study provide recommendations to focus further study on seven MTFs to identify those that merit further development and integration with their local trauma systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9086679/ /pubmed/35602974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2021-000832 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lee, Blair C McEvoy, Christian S Ross-Li, Dan Norris, Emily A Tadlock, Matthew D Shackelford, Stacy A Jensen, Shane D Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development |
title | Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development |
title_full | Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development |
title_fullStr | Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development |
title_full_unstemmed | Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development |
title_short | Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development |
title_sort | building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9086679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35602974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2021-000832 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeblairc buildingtraumacapabilityusinggeospatialanalysistoconsidermilitarytreatmentfacilitiesfortraumacenterdevelopment AT mcevoychristians buildingtraumacapabilityusinggeospatialanalysistoconsidermilitarytreatmentfacilitiesfortraumacenterdevelopment AT rosslidan buildingtraumacapabilityusinggeospatialanalysistoconsidermilitarytreatmentfacilitiesfortraumacenterdevelopment AT norrisemilya buildingtraumacapabilityusinggeospatialanalysistoconsidermilitarytreatmentfacilitiesfortraumacenterdevelopment AT tadlockmatthewd buildingtraumacapabilityusinggeospatialanalysistoconsidermilitarytreatmentfacilitiesfortraumacenterdevelopment AT shackelfordstacya buildingtraumacapabilityusinggeospatialanalysistoconsidermilitarytreatmentfacilitiesfortraumacenterdevelopment AT jensenshaned buildingtraumacapabilityusinggeospatialanalysistoconsidermilitarytreatmentfacilitiesfortraumacenterdevelopment |