Cargando…

Voice-Enabled Intelligent Virtual Agents for People With Amnesia: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Older adults often have increasing memory problems (amnesia), and approximately 50 million people worldwide have dementia. This syndrome gradually affects a patient over a period of 10-20 years. Intelligent virtual agents may support people with amnesia. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to ide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boumans, Roel, van de Sande, Yana, Thill, Serge, Bosse, Tibor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9086881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468084
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32473
_version_ 1784704102505119744
author Boumans, Roel
van de Sande, Yana
Thill, Serge
Bosse, Tibor
author_facet Boumans, Roel
van de Sande, Yana
Thill, Serge
Bosse, Tibor
author_sort Boumans, Roel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Older adults often have increasing memory problems (amnesia), and approximately 50 million people worldwide have dementia. This syndrome gradually affects a patient over a period of 10-20 years. Intelligent virtual agents may support people with amnesia. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify state-of-the-art experimental studies with virtual agents on a screen capable of verbal dialogues with a target group of older adults with amnesia. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, SCOPUS, Microsoft Academic, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and CrossRef on virtual agent and amnesia on papers that describe such experiments. Search criteria were (Virtual Agent OR Virtual Assistant OR Virtual Human OR Conversational Agent OR Virtual Coach OR Chatbot) AND (Amnesia OR Dementia OR Alzheimer OR Mild Cognitive Impairment). Risk of bias was evaluated using the QualSyst tool (University of Alberta), which scores 14 study quality items. Eligible studies are reported in a table including country, study design type, target sample size, controls, study aims, experiment population, intervention details, results, and an image of the agent. RESULTS: A total of 8 studies was included in this meta-analysis. The average number of participants in the studies was 20 (SD 12). The verbal interactions were generally short. The usability was generally reported to be positive. The human utterance was seen in 7 (88%) out of 8 studies based on short words or phrases that were predefined in the agent’s speech recognition algorithm. The average study quality score was 0.69 (SD 0.08) on a scale of 0 to 1. CONCLUSIONS: The number of experimental studies on talking about virtual agents that support people with memory problems is still small. The details on the verbal interaction are limited, which makes it difficult to assess the quality of the interaction and the possible effects of confounding parameters. In addition, the derivation of the aggregated data was difficult. Further research with extended and prolonged dialogues is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9086881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90868812022-05-11 Voice-Enabled Intelligent Virtual Agents for People With Amnesia: Systematic Review Boumans, Roel van de Sande, Yana Thill, Serge Bosse, Tibor JMIR Aging Review BACKGROUND: Older adults often have increasing memory problems (amnesia), and approximately 50 million people worldwide have dementia. This syndrome gradually affects a patient over a period of 10-20 years. Intelligent virtual agents may support people with amnesia. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify state-of-the-art experimental studies with virtual agents on a screen capable of verbal dialogues with a target group of older adults with amnesia. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, SCOPUS, Microsoft Academic, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and CrossRef on virtual agent and amnesia on papers that describe such experiments. Search criteria were (Virtual Agent OR Virtual Assistant OR Virtual Human OR Conversational Agent OR Virtual Coach OR Chatbot) AND (Amnesia OR Dementia OR Alzheimer OR Mild Cognitive Impairment). Risk of bias was evaluated using the QualSyst tool (University of Alberta), which scores 14 study quality items. Eligible studies are reported in a table including country, study design type, target sample size, controls, study aims, experiment population, intervention details, results, and an image of the agent. RESULTS: A total of 8 studies was included in this meta-analysis. The average number of participants in the studies was 20 (SD 12). The verbal interactions were generally short. The usability was generally reported to be positive. The human utterance was seen in 7 (88%) out of 8 studies based on short words or phrases that were predefined in the agent’s speech recognition algorithm. The average study quality score was 0.69 (SD 0.08) on a scale of 0 to 1. CONCLUSIONS: The number of experimental studies on talking about virtual agents that support people with memory problems is still small. The details on the verbal interaction are limited, which makes it difficult to assess the quality of the interaction and the possible effects of confounding parameters. In addition, the derivation of the aggregated data was difficult. Further research with extended and prolonged dialogues is required. JMIR Publications 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9086881/ /pubmed/35468084 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32473 Text en ©Roel Boumans, Yana van de Sande, Serge Thill, Tibor Bosse. Originally published in JMIR Aging (https://aging.jmir.org), 25.04.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Aging, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://aging.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Boumans, Roel
van de Sande, Yana
Thill, Serge
Bosse, Tibor
Voice-Enabled Intelligent Virtual Agents for People With Amnesia: Systematic Review
title Voice-Enabled Intelligent Virtual Agents for People With Amnesia: Systematic Review
title_full Voice-Enabled Intelligent Virtual Agents for People With Amnesia: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Voice-Enabled Intelligent Virtual Agents for People With Amnesia: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Voice-Enabled Intelligent Virtual Agents for People With Amnesia: Systematic Review
title_short Voice-Enabled Intelligent Virtual Agents for People With Amnesia: Systematic Review
title_sort voice-enabled intelligent virtual agents for people with amnesia: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9086881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468084
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32473
work_keys_str_mv AT boumansroel voiceenabledintelligentvirtualagentsforpeoplewithamnesiasystematicreview
AT vandesandeyana voiceenabledintelligentvirtualagentsforpeoplewithamnesiasystematicreview
AT thillserge voiceenabledintelligentvirtualagentsforpeoplewithamnesiasystematicreview
AT bossetibor voiceenabledintelligentvirtualagentsforpeoplewithamnesiasystematicreview