Cargando…

The “Great Debate” at Melanoma Bridge 2021, December 2nd–4th, 2021

The Great Debate session at the 2021 Melanoma Bridge virtual congress (December 2–4) featured counterpoint views from experts on seven important issues in melanoma. The debates considered the use of adoptive cell therapy versus use of bispecific antibodies, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ascierto, Paolo A., Warner, Allison Betof, Blank, Christian, Caracò, Corrado, Demaria, Sandra, Gershenwald, Jeffrey E., Khushalani, Nikhil I., Long, Georgina V., Luke, Jason J., Mehnert, Janice M., Robert, Caroline, Rutkowski, Piotr, Tawbi, Hussein A., Osman, Iman, Puzanov, Igor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03406-7
Descripción
Sumario:The Great Debate session at the 2021 Melanoma Bridge virtual congress (December 2–4) featured counterpoint views from experts on seven important issues in melanoma. The debates considered the use of adoptive cell therapy versus use of bispecific antibodies, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors versus immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting, whether the use of corticosteroids for the management of side effects have an impact on outcomes, the choice of programmed death (PD)-1 combination therapy with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA)-4 or lymphocyte-activation gene (LAG)-3, whether radiation is needed for brain metastases, when lymphadenectomy should be integrated into the treatment plan and then the last debate, telemedicine versus face-to-face. As with previous Bridge congresses, the debates were assigned by meeting Chairs and positions taken by experts during the debates may not have necessarily reflected their respective personal view. Audiences voted both before and after each debate.