Cargando…

Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In this brief report, we compare the effectiveness and safety of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and conventional 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with methamphetamine use disorder (MAUD). Our study suggests that iTBS would also r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Qingming, Sun, Huimeng, Hu, Yitian, Wang, Qiongyao, Zhao, Zhiyong, Dong, Da, Shen, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35558419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.842947
_version_ 1784704168766734336
author Liu, Qingming
Sun, Huimeng
Hu, Yitian
Wang, Qiongyao
Zhao, Zhiyong
Dong, Da
Shen, Ying
author_facet Liu, Qingming
Sun, Huimeng
Hu, Yitian
Wang, Qiongyao
Zhao, Zhiyong
Dong, Da
Shen, Ying
author_sort Liu, Qingming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In this brief report, we compare the effectiveness and safety of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and conventional 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with methamphetamine use disorder (MAUD). Our study suggests that iTBS would also reduce drug craving in patients with MAUD just as the 10 Hz; thus, there may be no difference in treatment effects between these two methods. METHODS: In total twenty male methamphetamine (MA) addicts were randomly assigned to iTBS (n = 10) or 10 Hz (n = 10) groups for 12 treatments. Cue-evoked cravings, anxiety, depression, and withdrawal symptoms were measured at baseline before the first treatment, and post-tests after days 10, 15, and 20. RESULTS: The results showed that iTBS and 10 Hz treatment had similar effectiveness in reducing cue-induced craving in male addicts for MA. Both 10 Hz and iTBS improved withdrawal symptoms of patients with MAUD. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent theta burst stimulation may be similar in effectiveness as 10 Hz in treating patients with MAUD. The clinical usefulness of rTMS could be improved substantially because of the increase in its capacity, cost, and accessibility. Importantly, the effectiveness of rTMS in the treatment of patients with MAUD is not yet proven, and should be tested in the large double-blind sham-controlled studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9087275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90872752022-05-11 Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients Liu, Qingming Sun, Huimeng Hu, Yitian Wang, Qiongyao Zhao, Zhiyong Dong, Da Shen, Ying Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In this brief report, we compare the effectiveness and safety of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and conventional 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with methamphetamine use disorder (MAUD). Our study suggests that iTBS would also reduce drug craving in patients with MAUD just as the 10 Hz; thus, there may be no difference in treatment effects between these two methods. METHODS: In total twenty male methamphetamine (MA) addicts were randomly assigned to iTBS (n = 10) or 10 Hz (n = 10) groups for 12 treatments. Cue-evoked cravings, anxiety, depression, and withdrawal symptoms were measured at baseline before the first treatment, and post-tests after days 10, 15, and 20. RESULTS: The results showed that iTBS and 10 Hz treatment had similar effectiveness in reducing cue-induced craving in male addicts for MA. Both 10 Hz and iTBS improved withdrawal symptoms of patients with MAUD. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent theta burst stimulation may be similar in effectiveness as 10 Hz in treating patients with MAUD. The clinical usefulness of rTMS could be improved substantially because of the increase in its capacity, cost, and accessibility. Importantly, the effectiveness of rTMS in the treatment of patients with MAUD is not yet proven, and should be tested in the large double-blind sham-controlled studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9087275/ /pubmed/35558419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.842947 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, Sun, Hu, Wang, Zhao, Dong and Shen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Liu, Qingming
Sun, Huimeng
Hu, Yitian
Wang, Qiongyao
Zhao, Zhiyong
Dong, Da
Shen, Ying
Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients
title Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients
title_full Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients
title_fullStr Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients
title_full_unstemmed Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients
title_short Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients
title_sort intermittent theta burst stimulation vs. high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of methamphetamine patients
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35558419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.842947
work_keys_str_mv AT liuqingming intermittentthetaburststimulationvshighfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofmethamphetaminepatients
AT sunhuimeng intermittentthetaburststimulationvshighfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofmethamphetaminepatients
AT huyitian intermittentthetaburststimulationvshighfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofmethamphetaminepatients
AT wangqiongyao intermittentthetaburststimulationvshighfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofmethamphetaminepatients
AT zhaozhiyong intermittentthetaburststimulationvshighfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofmethamphetaminepatients
AT dongda intermittentthetaburststimulationvshighfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofmethamphetaminepatients
AT shenying intermittentthetaburststimulationvshighfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofmethamphetaminepatients