Cargando…
Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In this brief report, we compare the effectiveness and safety of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and conventional 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with methamphetamine use disorder (MAUD). Our study suggests that iTBS would also r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35558419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.842947 |
_version_ | 1784704168766734336 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Qingming Sun, Huimeng Hu, Yitian Wang, Qiongyao Zhao, Zhiyong Dong, Da Shen, Ying |
author_facet | Liu, Qingming Sun, Huimeng Hu, Yitian Wang, Qiongyao Zhao, Zhiyong Dong, Da Shen, Ying |
author_sort | Liu, Qingming |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In this brief report, we compare the effectiveness and safety of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and conventional 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with methamphetamine use disorder (MAUD). Our study suggests that iTBS would also reduce drug craving in patients with MAUD just as the 10 Hz; thus, there may be no difference in treatment effects between these two methods. METHODS: In total twenty male methamphetamine (MA) addicts were randomly assigned to iTBS (n = 10) or 10 Hz (n = 10) groups for 12 treatments. Cue-evoked cravings, anxiety, depression, and withdrawal symptoms were measured at baseline before the first treatment, and post-tests after days 10, 15, and 20. RESULTS: The results showed that iTBS and 10 Hz treatment had similar effectiveness in reducing cue-induced craving in male addicts for MA. Both 10 Hz and iTBS improved withdrawal symptoms of patients with MAUD. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent theta burst stimulation may be similar in effectiveness as 10 Hz in treating patients with MAUD. The clinical usefulness of rTMS could be improved substantially because of the increase in its capacity, cost, and accessibility. Importantly, the effectiveness of rTMS in the treatment of patients with MAUD is not yet proven, and should be tested in the large double-blind sham-controlled studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9087275 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90872752022-05-11 Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients Liu, Qingming Sun, Huimeng Hu, Yitian Wang, Qiongyao Zhao, Zhiyong Dong, Da Shen, Ying Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In this brief report, we compare the effectiveness and safety of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and conventional 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with methamphetamine use disorder (MAUD). Our study suggests that iTBS would also reduce drug craving in patients with MAUD just as the 10 Hz; thus, there may be no difference in treatment effects between these two methods. METHODS: In total twenty male methamphetamine (MA) addicts were randomly assigned to iTBS (n = 10) or 10 Hz (n = 10) groups for 12 treatments. Cue-evoked cravings, anxiety, depression, and withdrawal symptoms were measured at baseline before the first treatment, and post-tests after days 10, 15, and 20. RESULTS: The results showed that iTBS and 10 Hz treatment had similar effectiveness in reducing cue-induced craving in male addicts for MA. Both 10 Hz and iTBS improved withdrawal symptoms of patients with MAUD. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent theta burst stimulation may be similar in effectiveness as 10 Hz in treating patients with MAUD. The clinical usefulness of rTMS could be improved substantially because of the increase in its capacity, cost, and accessibility. Importantly, the effectiveness of rTMS in the treatment of patients with MAUD is not yet proven, and should be tested in the large double-blind sham-controlled studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9087275/ /pubmed/35558419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.842947 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, Sun, Hu, Wang, Zhao, Dong and Shen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Liu, Qingming Sun, Huimeng Hu, Yitian Wang, Qiongyao Zhao, Zhiyong Dong, Da Shen, Ying Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients |
title | Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients |
title_full | Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients |
title_fullStr | Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients |
title_short | Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation vs. High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Patients |
title_sort | intermittent theta burst stimulation vs. high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of methamphetamine patients |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35558419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.842947 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuqingming intermittentthetaburststimulationvshighfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofmethamphetaminepatients AT sunhuimeng intermittentthetaburststimulationvshighfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofmethamphetaminepatients AT huyitian intermittentthetaburststimulationvshighfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofmethamphetaminepatients AT wangqiongyao intermittentthetaburststimulationvshighfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofmethamphetaminepatients AT zhaozhiyong intermittentthetaburststimulationvshighfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofmethamphetaminepatients AT dongda intermittentthetaburststimulationvshighfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofmethamphetaminepatients AT shenying intermittentthetaburststimulationvshighfrequencyrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinthetreatmentofmethamphetaminepatients |