Cargando…
Recovery of the breast screening programme following pandemic-related delays: Should we focus on round length or uptake?
OBJECTIVES: The NHS Breast Screening programme is recovering from the hiatus in screening in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Currently, open rather than timed invitations are issued, which leads to lower uptake but more rapid coverage of the eligible population by invitation and therefore closer...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35119338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413211066476 |
_version_ | 1784704175124250624 |
---|---|
author | Duffy, Stephen W. Hudson, Sue Vulkan, Daniel Duffy, Thomas E. Binysh, Kathie |
author_facet | Duffy, Stephen W. Hudson, Sue Vulkan, Daniel Duffy, Thomas E. Binysh, Kathie |
author_sort | Duffy, Stephen W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The NHS Breast Screening programme is recovering from the hiatus in screening in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Currently, open rather than timed invitations are issued, which leads to lower uptake but more rapid coverage of the eligible population by invitation and therefore closer adherence to a round length of 3 years. We aimed to estimate the likely effect on numbers of cancers detected at incident screens of a range of round lengths and uptake rates. METHODS: We assumed exponential distributions of time to incidence of preclinical screen-detectable cancer and of time to progression thereafter to symptomatic clinical disease. We derived numerical values of these, along with screening sensitivity, from published research results and statistics from the NHS Breast Screening programme. These were used to calculate numbers of cancers detected at incident screens at ages 51–70 by round length and uptake rates. RESULTS: We found that in a homogeneous population of cancers, a 4-year round length with uptake of 62%, as observed with timed appointments in London before the pandemic, would result in 295 cancers screen detected per 10,000 invited, compared to 222 cancers with a 3-year round and uptake of 46%, as observed in London during the recovery period. Similar results were found when we posited two populations, one of rapidly progressing and one of slowly progressing cancers. CONCLUSIONS: It may be more productive in terms of early detection to focus on uptake rather than round length in the programme's recovery from the pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9087308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90873082022-05-11 Recovery of the breast screening programme following pandemic-related delays: Should we focus on round length or uptake? Duffy, Stephen W. Hudson, Sue Vulkan, Daniel Duffy, Thomas E. Binysh, Kathie J Med Screen Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The NHS Breast Screening programme is recovering from the hiatus in screening in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Currently, open rather than timed invitations are issued, which leads to lower uptake but more rapid coverage of the eligible population by invitation and therefore closer adherence to a round length of 3 years. We aimed to estimate the likely effect on numbers of cancers detected at incident screens of a range of round lengths and uptake rates. METHODS: We assumed exponential distributions of time to incidence of preclinical screen-detectable cancer and of time to progression thereafter to symptomatic clinical disease. We derived numerical values of these, along with screening sensitivity, from published research results and statistics from the NHS Breast Screening programme. These were used to calculate numbers of cancers detected at incident screens at ages 51–70 by round length and uptake rates. RESULTS: We found that in a homogeneous population of cancers, a 4-year round length with uptake of 62%, as observed with timed appointments in London before the pandemic, would result in 295 cancers screen detected per 10,000 invited, compared to 222 cancers with a 3-year round and uptake of 46%, as observed in London during the recovery period. Similar results were found when we posited two populations, one of rapidly progressing and one of slowly progressing cancers. CONCLUSIONS: It may be more productive in terms of early detection to focus on uptake rather than round length in the programme's recovery from the pandemic. SAGE Publications 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9087308/ /pubmed/35119338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413211066476 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Duffy, Stephen W. Hudson, Sue Vulkan, Daniel Duffy, Thomas E. Binysh, Kathie Recovery of the breast screening programme following pandemic-related delays: Should we focus on round length or uptake? |
title | Recovery of the breast screening programme following pandemic-related
delays: Should we focus on round length or uptake? |
title_full | Recovery of the breast screening programme following pandemic-related
delays: Should we focus on round length or uptake? |
title_fullStr | Recovery of the breast screening programme following pandemic-related
delays: Should we focus on round length or uptake? |
title_full_unstemmed | Recovery of the breast screening programme following pandemic-related
delays: Should we focus on round length or uptake? |
title_short | Recovery of the breast screening programme following pandemic-related
delays: Should we focus on round length or uptake? |
title_sort | recovery of the breast screening programme following pandemic-related
delays: should we focus on round length or uptake? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35119338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413211066476 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duffystephenw recoveryofthebreastscreeningprogrammefollowingpandemicrelateddelaysshouldwefocusonroundlengthoruptake AT hudsonsue recoveryofthebreastscreeningprogrammefollowingpandemicrelateddelaysshouldwefocusonroundlengthoruptake AT vulkandaniel recoveryofthebreastscreeningprogrammefollowingpandemicrelateddelaysshouldwefocusonroundlengthoruptake AT duffythomase recoveryofthebreastscreeningprogrammefollowingpandemicrelateddelaysshouldwefocusonroundlengthoruptake AT binyshkathie recoveryofthebreastscreeningprogrammefollowingpandemicrelateddelaysshouldwefocusonroundlengthoruptake |