Cargando…
Safety assessment of the process rPET InWaste, based on the NGR technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials
The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP) assessed the safety of the recycling process rPET InWaste (EU register number RECYC231), which uses the NGR technology. The input is washed and dried poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) flakes mainly originating from collecte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35582365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7273 |
_version_ | 1784704199912587264 |
---|---|
author | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Dudler, Vincent Milana, Maria Rosaria Papaspyrides, Constantine Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Lioupis, Alexandros Lampi, Evgenia |
author_facet | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Dudler, Vincent Milana, Maria Rosaria Papaspyrides, Constantine Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Lioupis, Alexandros Lampi, Evgenia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP) assessed the safety of the recycling process rPET InWaste (EU register number RECYC231), which uses the NGR technology. The input is washed and dried poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) flakes mainly originating from collected post‐consumer PET containers, with no more than 5% PET from non‐food consumer applications. The flakes are dried (step 2), melted in an extruder (step 3) and decontaminated during a melt‐state polycondensation step under high temperature and vacuum (step 4). In step 5, the melt material is granulated. Having examined the challenge test provided, the Panel concluded that the melt‐state polycondensation (step 4) is critical in determining the decontamination efficiency of the process. The operating parameters to control the performance of the critical steps are the pressure, the temperature, the residence time (depending on the mass and throughput of the melt) and the characteristics of the reactor. It was demonstrated that this recycling process is able to ensure that the level of migration of potential unknown contaminants into food is below the conservatively modelled migration of 0.1 μg/kg food. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the recycled PET obtained from this process is not of safety concern, when used at up to 100% for the manufacture of materials and articles for contact with all types of foodstuffs, including drinking water, for long‐term storage at room temperature, with or without hotfill. The final articles made of this recycled PET are not intended to be used in microwave and conventional ovens and such uses are not covered by this evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9087456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90874562022-05-16 Safety assessment of the process rPET InWaste, based on the NGR technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Dudler, Vincent Milana, Maria Rosaria Papaspyrides, Constantine Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Lioupis, Alexandros Lampi, Evgenia EFSA J Scientific Opinion The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP) assessed the safety of the recycling process rPET InWaste (EU register number RECYC231), which uses the NGR technology. The input is washed and dried poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) flakes mainly originating from collected post‐consumer PET containers, with no more than 5% PET from non‐food consumer applications. The flakes are dried (step 2), melted in an extruder (step 3) and decontaminated during a melt‐state polycondensation step under high temperature and vacuum (step 4). In step 5, the melt material is granulated. Having examined the challenge test provided, the Panel concluded that the melt‐state polycondensation (step 4) is critical in determining the decontamination efficiency of the process. The operating parameters to control the performance of the critical steps are the pressure, the temperature, the residence time (depending on the mass and throughput of the melt) and the characteristics of the reactor. It was demonstrated that this recycling process is able to ensure that the level of migration of potential unknown contaminants into food is below the conservatively modelled migration of 0.1 μg/kg food. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the recycled PET obtained from this process is not of safety concern, when used at up to 100% for the manufacture of materials and articles for contact with all types of foodstuffs, including drinking water, for long‐term storage at room temperature, with or without hotfill. The final articles made of this recycled PET are not intended to be used in microwave and conventional ovens and such uses are not covered by this evaluation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9087456/ /pubmed/35582365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7273 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Dudler, Vincent Milana, Maria Rosaria Papaspyrides, Constantine Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Lioupis, Alexandros Lampi, Evgenia Safety assessment of the process rPET InWaste, based on the NGR technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials |
title | Safety assessment of the process rPET InWaste, based on the NGR technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials |
title_full | Safety assessment of the process rPET InWaste, based on the NGR technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials |
title_fullStr | Safety assessment of the process rPET InWaste, based on the NGR technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety assessment of the process rPET InWaste, based on the NGR technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials |
title_short | Safety assessment of the process rPET InWaste, based on the NGR technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials |
title_sort | safety assessment of the process rpet inwaste, based on the ngr technology, used to recycle post‐consumer pet into food contact materials |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35582365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT lambreclaude safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT bolognesiclaudia safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT chessonandrew safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT crebelliriccardo safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT gottdavidmichael safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT grobkonrad safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT mengelersmarcel safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT mortensenalicja safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT rivieregilles safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT steffenseningerlise safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT tlustoschristina safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT vanloverenhenk safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT vernislaurence safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT zornholger safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT dudlervincent safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT milanamariarosaria safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT papaspyridesconstantine safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT tavarespocasmariadefatima safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT lioupisalexandros safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT lampievgenia safetyassessmentoftheprocessrpetinwastebasedonthengrtechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials |