Cargando…

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11

The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authority of the rapporteur Member State, the United Kingdom, for the pesticide active substance Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11 and the considerations as regards the inclusion of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anastassiadou, Maria, Arena, Maria, Auteri, Domenica, Brancato, Alba, Bura, Laszlo, Carrasco Cabrera, Luis, Castoldi, Anna, Chaideftou, Eugenia, Chiusolo, Arianna, Crivellente, Federica, De Lentdecker, Chloe, Egsmose, Mark, Fait, Gabriella, Greco, Luna, Ippolito, Alessio, Istace, Frederique, Jarrah, Samira, Kardassi, Dimitra, Leuschner, Renata, Lostia, Alfonso, Lythgo, Christopher, Magrans, Oriol, Mangas, Iris, Miron, Ileana, Molnar, Tunde, Padovani, Laura, Parra Morte, Juan Manuel, Pedersen, Ragnor, Reich, Hermine, Santos, Miguel, Sharp, Rachel, Szentes, Csaba, Terron, Andrea, Tiramani, Manuela, Vagenende, Benedicte, Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35582366
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.6393
_version_ 1784704203858378752
author Anastassiadou, Maria
Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Brancato, Alba
Bura, Laszlo
Carrasco Cabrera, Luis
Castoldi, Anna
Chaideftou, Eugenia
Chiusolo, Arianna
Crivellente, Federica
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Egsmose, Mark
Fait, Gabriella
Greco, Luna
Ippolito, Alessio
Istace, Frederique
Jarrah, Samira
Kardassi, Dimitra
Leuschner, Renata
Lostia, Alfonso
Lythgo, Christopher
Magrans, Oriol
Mangas, Iris
Miron, Ileana
Molnar, Tunde
Padovani, Laura
Parra Morte, Juan Manuel
Pedersen, Ragnor
Reich, Hermine
Santos, Miguel
Sharp, Rachel
Szentes, Csaba
Terron, Andrea
Tiramani, Manuela
Vagenende, Benedicte
Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
author_facet Anastassiadou, Maria
Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Brancato, Alba
Bura, Laszlo
Carrasco Cabrera, Luis
Castoldi, Anna
Chaideftou, Eugenia
Chiusolo, Arianna
Crivellente, Federica
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Egsmose, Mark
Fait, Gabriella
Greco, Luna
Ippolito, Alessio
Istace, Frederique
Jarrah, Samira
Kardassi, Dimitra
Leuschner, Renata
Lostia, Alfonso
Lythgo, Christopher
Magrans, Oriol
Mangas, Iris
Miron, Ileana
Molnar, Tunde
Padovani, Laura
Parra Morte, Juan Manuel
Pedersen, Ragnor
Reich, Hermine
Santos, Miguel
Sharp, Rachel
Szentes, Csaba
Terron, Andrea
Tiramani, Manuela
Vagenende, Benedicte
Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
collection PubMed
description The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authority of the rapporteur Member State, the United Kingdom, for the pesticide active substance Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11 and the considerations as regards the inclusion of the substance in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11 as nematicide on tomato, pepper, aubergine, cucumber, courgette, melon, watermelon, pumpkin (field and greenhouse applications). The reliable endpoints appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9087472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90874722022-05-16 Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11 Anastassiadou, Maria Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Brancato, Alba Bura, Laszlo Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Castoldi, Anna Chaideftou, Eugenia Chiusolo, Arianna Crivellente, Federica De Lentdecker, Chloe Egsmose, Mark Fait, Gabriella Greco, Luna Ippolito, Alessio Istace, Frederique Jarrah, Samira Kardassi, Dimitra Leuschner, Renata Lostia, Alfonso Lythgo, Christopher Magrans, Oriol Mangas, Iris Miron, Ileana Molnar, Tunde Padovani, Laura Parra Morte, Juan Manuel Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Santos, Miguel Sharp, Rachel Szentes, Csaba Terron, Andrea Tiramani, Manuela Vagenende, Benedicte Villamar‐Bouza, Laura EFSA J Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authority of the rapporteur Member State, the United Kingdom, for the pesticide active substance Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11 and the considerations as regards the inclusion of the substance in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11 as nematicide on tomato, pepper, aubergine, cucumber, courgette, melon, watermelon, pumpkin (field and greenhouse applications). The reliable endpoints appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9087472/ /pubmed/35582366 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.6393 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review
Anastassiadou, Maria
Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Brancato, Alba
Bura, Laszlo
Carrasco Cabrera, Luis
Castoldi, Anna
Chaideftou, Eugenia
Chiusolo, Arianna
Crivellente, Federica
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Egsmose, Mark
Fait, Gabriella
Greco, Luna
Ippolito, Alessio
Istace, Frederique
Jarrah, Samira
Kardassi, Dimitra
Leuschner, Renata
Lostia, Alfonso
Lythgo, Christopher
Magrans, Oriol
Mangas, Iris
Miron, Ileana
Molnar, Tunde
Padovani, Laura
Parra Morte, Juan Manuel
Pedersen, Ragnor
Reich, Hermine
Santos, Miguel
Sharp, Rachel
Szentes, Csaba
Terron, Andrea
Tiramani, Manuela
Vagenende, Benedicte
Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11
title Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11
title_full Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11
title_fullStr Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11
title_full_unstemmed Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11
title_short Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Purpureocillium lilacinum strain PL11
title_sort peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance purpureocillium lilacinum strain pl11
topic Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35582366
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.6393
work_keys_str_mv AT peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT anastassiadoumaria peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT arenamaria peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT auteridomenica peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT brancatoalba peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT buralaszlo peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT carrascocabreraluis peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT castoldianna peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT chaideftoueugenia peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT chiusoloarianna peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT crivellentefederica peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT delentdeckerchloe peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT egsmosemark peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT faitgabriella peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT grecoluna peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT ippolitoalessio peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT istacefrederique peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT jarrahsamira peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT kardassidimitra peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT leuschnerrenata peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT lostiaalfonso peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT lythgochristopher peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT magransoriol peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT mangasiris peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT mironileana peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT molnartunde peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT padovanilaura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT parramortejuanmanuel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT pedersenragnor peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT reichhermine peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT santosmiguel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT sharprachel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT szentescsaba peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT terronandrea peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT tiramanimanuela peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT vagenendebenedicte peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11
AT villamarbouzalaura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancepurpureocilliumlilacinumstrainpl11