Cargando…

Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics

For the sake of comparison, a single cell with nanofiber-based LST–GDC composite anode (Cell-1) and a single cell with nanoparticle-based LST–GDC composite anode (Cell-2) are fabricated, respectively. The electrolyte ohmic resistances of the LST–GDC composite anode side half-cells are determined by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yuwei, Zhao, Erqing, Fan, Liquan, Hu, Qianjun, Liu, Xijun, Li, Yufeng, Xiong, Yueping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35547939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra06522e
_version_ 1784704237435879424
author Wang, Yuwei
Zhao, Erqing
Fan, Liquan
Hu, Qianjun
Liu, Xijun
Li, Yufeng
Xiong, Yueping
author_facet Wang, Yuwei
Zhao, Erqing
Fan, Liquan
Hu, Qianjun
Liu, Xijun
Li, Yufeng
Xiong, Yueping
author_sort Wang, Yuwei
collection PubMed
description For the sake of comparison, a single cell with nanofiber-based LST–GDC composite anode (Cell-1) and a single cell with nanoparticle-based LST–GDC composite anode (Cell-2) are fabricated, respectively. The electrolyte ohmic resistances of the LST–GDC composite anode side half-cells are determined by an AC resistance measurement. Current interrupt is applied to measure the ohmic resistance of the half-cells. Combined with V–I characteristics, the influences of the potential drops caused by electrolyte ohmic resistance, electrode ohmic resistance and electrode electrochemical reaction on the cell kinetics are investigated. Under a current density of 0.6 A cm(−2) at 850 °C, for the nanofiber-based LST–GDC composite anode (NF-LST–GDC), the electrode ohmic potential drop is 0.007 V and the potential drop caused by the electrode electrochemical reaction is 0.080 V. While for the nanoparticle-based LST–GDC composite anode (NP-LST–GDC), the corresponding potential drops are 0.159 V and 0.246 V, respectively. Both the potential drops of the former are lower than those of the latter. The kinetics of Cell-1 is greater than Cell-2, i.e., the kinetics of NF-LST–GDC is greater than that of NP-LST–GDC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9087826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90878262022-05-10 Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics Wang, Yuwei Zhao, Erqing Fan, Liquan Hu, Qianjun Liu, Xijun Li, Yufeng Xiong, Yueping RSC Adv Chemistry For the sake of comparison, a single cell with nanofiber-based LST–GDC composite anode (Cell-1) and a single cell with nanoparticle-based LST–GDC composite anode (Cell-2) are fabricated, respectively. The electrolyte ohmic resistances of the LST–GDC composite anode side half-cells are determined by an AC resistance measurement. Current interrupt is applied to measure the ohmic resistance of the half-cells. Combined with V–I characteristics, the influences of the potential drops caused by electrolyte ohmic resistance, electrode ohmic resistance and electrode electrochemical reaction on the cell kinetics are investigated. Under a current density of 0.6 A cm(−2) at 850 °C, for the nanofiber-based LST–GDC composite anode (NF-LST–GDC), the electrode ohmic potential drop is 0.007 V and the potential drop caused by the electrode electrochemical reaction is 0.080 V. While for the nanoparticle-based LST–GDC composite anode (NP-LST–GDC), the corresponding potential drops are 0.159 V and 0.246 V, respectively. Both the potential drops of the former are lower than those of the latter. The kinetics of Cell-1 is greater than Cell-2, i.e., the kinetics of NF-LST–GDC is greater than that of NP-LST–GDC. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9087826/ /pubmed/35547939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra06522e Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Wang, Yuwei
Zhao, Erqing
Fan, Liquan
Hu, Qianjun
Liu, Xijun
Li, Yufeng
Xiong, Yueping
Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics
title Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics
title_full Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics
title_fullStr Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics
title_short Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics
title_sort analysis of nanofiber-based la(0.2)sr(0.8)tio(3)–gd(0.2)ce(0.8)o(1.9) electrode kinetics
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35547939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra06522e
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyuwei analysisofnanofiberbasedla02sr08tio3gd02ce08o19electrodekinetics
AT zhaoerqing analysisofnanofiberbasedla02sr08tio3gd02ce08o19electrodekinetics
AT fanliquan analysisofnanofiberbasedla02sr08tio3gd02ce08o19electrodekinetics
AT huqianjun analysisofnanofiberbasedla02sr08tio3gd02ce08o19electrodekinetics
AT liuxijun analysisofnanofiberbasedla02sr08tio3gd02ce08o19electrodekinetics
AT liyufeng analysisofnanofiberbasedla02sr08tio3gd02ce08o19electrodekinetics
AT xiongyueping analysisofnanofiberbasedla02sr08tio3gd02ce08o19electrodekinetics