Cargando…
Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics
For the sake of comparison, a single cell with nanofiber-based LST–GDC composite anode (Cell-1) and a single cell with nanoparticle-based LST–GDC composite anode (Cell-2) are fabricated, respectively. The electrolyte ohmic resistances of the LST–GDC composite anode side half-cells are determined by...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society of Chemistry
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35547939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra06522e |
_version_ | 1784704237435879424 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Yuwei Zhao, Erqing Fan, Liquan Hu, Qianjun Liu, Xijun Li, Yufeng Xiong, Yueping |
author_facet | Wang, Yuwei Zhao, Erqing Fan, Liquan Hu, Qianjun Liu, Xijun Li, Yufeng Xiong, Yueping |
author_sort | Wang, Yuwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | For the sake of comparison, a single cell with nanofiber-based LST–GDC composite anode (Cell-1) and a single cell with nanoparticle-based LST–GDC composite anode (Cell-2) are fabricated, respectively. The electrolyte ohmic resistances of the LST–GDC composite anode side half-cells are determined by an AC resistance measurement. Current interrupt is applied to measure the ohmic resistance of the half-cells. Combined with V–I characteristics, the influences of the potential drops caused by electrolyte ohmic resistance, electrode ohmic resistance and electrode electrochemical reaction on the cell kinetics are investigated. Under a current density of 0.6 A cm(−2) at 850 °C, for the nanofiber-based LST–GDC composite anode (NF-LST–GDC), the electrode ohmic potential drop is 0.007 V and the potential drop caused by the electrode electrochemical reaction is 0.080 V. While for the nanoparticle-based LST–GDC composite anode (NP-LST–GDC), the corresponding potential drops are 0.159 V and 0.246 V, respectively. Both the potential drops of the former are lower than those of the latter. The kinetics of Cell-1 is greater than Cell-2, i.e., the kinetics of NF-LST–GDC is greater than that of NP-LST–GDC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9087826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Royal Society of Chemistry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90878262022-05-10 Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics Wang, Yuwei Zhao, Erqing Fan, Liquan Hu, Qianjun Liu, Xijun Li, Yufeng Xiong, Yueping RSC Adv Chemistry For the sake of comparison, a single cell with nanofiber-based LST–GDC composite anode (Cell-1) and a single cell with nanoparticle-based LST–GDC composite anode (Cell-2) are fabricated, respectively. The electrolyte ohmic resistances of the LST–GDC composite anode side half-cells are determined by an AC resistance measurement. Current interrupt is applied to measure the ohmic resistance of the half-cells. Combined with V–I characteristics, the influences of the potential drops caused by electrolyte ohmic resistance, electrode ohmic resistance and electrode electrochemical reaction on the cell kinetics are investigated. Under a current density of 0.6 A cm(−2) at 850 °C, for the nanofiber-based LST–GDC composite anode (NF-LST–GDC), the electrode ohmic potential drop is 0.007 V and the potential drop caused by the electrode electrochemical reaction is 0.080 V. While for the nanoparticle-based LST–GDC composite anode (NP-LST–GDC), the corresponding potential drops are 0.159 V and 0.246 V, respectively. Both the potential drops of the former are lower than those of the latter. The kinetics of Cell-1 is greater than Cell-2, i.e., the kinetics of NF-LST–GDC is greater than that of NP-LST–GDC. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9087826/ /pubmed/35547939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra06522e Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Chemistry Wang, Yuwei Zhao, Erqing Fan, Liquan Hu, Qianjun Liu, Xijun Li, Yufeng Xiong, Yueping Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics |
title | Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics |
title_full | Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics |
title_fullStr | Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics |
title_short | Analysis of nanofiber-based La(0.2)Sr(0.8)TiO(3)–Gd(0.2)Ce(0.8)O(1.9) electrode kinetics |
title_sort | analysis of nanofiber-based la(0.2)sr(0.8)tio(3)–gd(0.2)ce(0.8)o(1.9) electrode kinetics |
topic | Chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35547939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra06522e |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangyuwei analysisofnanofiberbasedla02sr08tio3gd02ce08o19electrodekinetics AT zhaoerqing analysisofnanofiberbasedla02sr08tio3gd02ce08o19electrodekinetics AT fanliquan analysisofnanofiberbasedla02sr08tio3gd02ce08o19electrodekinetics AT huqianjun analysisofnanofiberbasedla02sr08tio3gd02ce08o19electrodekinetics AT liuxijun analysisofnanofiberbasedla02sr08tio3gd02ce08o19electrodekinetics AT liyufeng analysisofnanofiberbasedla02sr08tio3gd02ce08o19electrodekinetics AT xiongyueping analysisofnanofiberbasedla02sr08tio3gd02ce08o19electrodekinetics |