Cargando…
Sensitivity of Diffusion MRI to White Matter Pathology: Influence of Diffusion Protocol, Magnetic Field Strength, and Processing Pipeline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
There are many ways to acquire and process diffusion MRI (dMRI) data for group studies, but it is unknown which maximizes the sensitivity to white matter (WM) pathology. Inspired by this question, we analyzed data acquired for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) at 3T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35557624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.837385 |
_version_ | 1784704243400179712 |
---|---|
author | Kornaropoulos, Evgenios N. Winzeck, Stefan Rumetshofer, Theodor Wikstrom, Anna Knutsson, Linda Correia, Marta M. Sundgren, Pia C. Nilsson, Markus |
author_facet | Kornaropoulos, Evgenios N. Winzeck, Stefan Rumetshofer, Theodor Wikstrom, Anna Knutsson, Linda Correia, Marta M. Sundgren, Pia C. Nilsson, Markus |
author_sort | Kornaropoulos, Evgenios N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are many ways to acquire and process diffusion MRI (dMRI) data for group studies, but it is unknown which maximizes the sensitivity to white matter (WM) pathology. Inspired by this question, we analyzed data acquired for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) at 3T (3T-DTI and 3T-DKI) and DTI at 7T in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and healthy controls (HC). Parameter estimates in 72 WM tracts were obtained using TractSeg. The impact on the sensitivity to WM pathology was evaluated for the diffusion protocol, the magnetic field strength, and the processing pipeline. Sensitivity was quantified in terms of Cohen's d for group comparison. Results showed that the choice of diffusion protocol had the largest impact on the effect size. The effect size in fractional anisotropy (FA) across all WM tracts was 0.26 higher when derived by DTI than by DKI and 0.20 higher in 3T compared with 7T. The difference due to the diffusion protocol was larger than the difference due to magnetic field strength for the majority of diffusion parameters. In contrast, the difference between including or excluding different processing steps was near negligible, except for the correction of distortions from eddy currents and motion which had a clearly positive impact. For example, effect sizes increased on average by 0.07 by including motion and eddy correction for FA derived from 3T-DTI. Effect sizes were slightly reduced by the incorporation of denoising and Gibbs-ringing removal (on average by 0.011 and 0.005, respectively). Smoothing prior to diffusion model fitting generally reduced effect sizes. In summary, 3T-DTI in combination with eddy current and motion correction yielded the highest sensitivity to WM pathology in patients with SLE. However, our results also indicated that the 3T-DKI and 7T-DTI protocols used here may be adjusted to increase effect sizes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9087851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90878512022-05-11 Sensitivity of Diffusion MRI to White Matter Pathology: Influence of Diffusion Protocol, Magnetic Field Strength, and Processing Pipeline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Kornaropoulos, Evgenios N. Winzeck, Stefan Rumetshofer, Theodor Wikstrom, Anna Knutsson, Linda Correia, Marta M. Sundgren, Pia C. Nilsson, Markus Front Neurol Neurology There are many ways to acquire and process diffusion MRI (dMRI) data for group studies, but it is unknown which maximizes the sensitivity to white matter (WM) pathology. Inspired by this question, we analyzed data acquired for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) at 3T (3T-DTI and 3T-DKI) and DTI at 7T in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and healthy controls (HC). Parameter estimates in 72 WM tracts were obtained using TractSeg. The impact on the sensitivity to WM pathology was evaluated for the diffusion protocol, the magnetic field strength, and the processing pipeline. Sensitivity was quantified in terms of Cohen's d for group comparison. Results showed that the choice of diffusion protocol had the largest impact on the effect size. The effect size in fractional anisotropy (FA) across all WM tracts was 0.26 higher when derived by DTI than by DKI and 0.20 higher in 3T compared with 7T. The difference due to the diffusion protocol was larger than the difference due to magnetic field strength for the majority of diffusion parameters. In contrast, the difference between including or excluding different processing steps was near negligible, except for the correction of distortions from eddy currents and motion which had a clearly positive impact. For example, effect sizes increased on average by 0.07 by including motion and eddy correction for FA derived from 3T-DTI. Effect sizes were slightly reduced by the incorporation of denoising and Gibbs-ringing removal (on average by 0.011 and 0.005, respectively). Smoothing prior to diffusion model fitting generally reduced effect sizes. In summary, 3T-DTI in combination with eddy current and motion correction yielded the highest sensitivity to WM pathology in patients with SLE. However, our results also indicated that the 3T-DKI and 7T-DTI protocols used here may be adjusted to increase effect sizes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9087851/ /pubmed/35557624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.837385 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kornaropoulos, Winzeck, Rumetshofer, Wikstrom, Knutsson, Correia, Sundgren and Nilsson. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Kornaropoulos, Evgenios N. Winzeck, Stefan Rumetshofer, Theodor Wikstrom, Anna Knutsson, Linda Correia, Marta M. Sundgren, Pia C. Nilsson, Markus Sensitivity of Diffusion MRI to White Matter Pathology: Influence of Diffusion Protocol, Magnetic Field Strength, and Processing Pipeline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus |
title | Sensitivity of Diffusion MRI to White Matter Pathology: Influence of Diffusion Protocol, Magnetic Field Strength, and Processing Pipeline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus |
title_full | Sensitivity of Diffusion MRI to White Matter Pathology: Influence of Diffusion Protocol, Magnetic Field Strength, and Processing Pipeline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus |
title_fullStr | Sensitivity of Diffusion MRI to White Matter Pathology: Influence of Diffusion Protocol, Magnetic Field Strength, and Processing Pipeline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensitivity of Diffusion MRI to White Matter Pathology: Influence of Diffusion Protocol, Magnetic Field Strength, and Processing Pipeline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus |
title_short | Sensitivity of Diffusion MRI to White Matter Pathology: Influence of Diffusion Protocol, Magnetic Field Strength, and Processing Pipeline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus |
title_sort | sensitivity of diffusion mri to white matter pathology: influence of diffusion protocol, magnetic field strength, and processing pipeline in systemic lupus erythematosus |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9087851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35557624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.837385 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kornaropoulosevgeniosn sensitivityofdiffusionmritowhitematterpathologyinfluenceofdiffusionprotocolmagneticfieldstrengthandprocessingpipelineinsystemiclupuserythematosus AT winzeckstefan sensitivityofdiffusionmritowhitematterpathologyinfluenceofdiffusionprotocolmagneticfieldstrengthandprocessingpipelineinsystemiclupuserythematosus AT rumetshofertheodor sensitivityofdiffusionmritowhitematterpathologyinfluenceofdiffusionprotocolmagneticfieldstrengthandprocessingpipelineinsystemiclupuserythematosus AT wikstromanna sensitivityofdiffusionmritowhitematterpathologyinfluenceofdiffusionprotocolmagneticfieldstrengthandprocessingpipelineinsystemiclupuserythematosus AT knutssonlinda sensitivityofdiffusionmritowhitematterpathologyinfluenceofdiffusionprotocolmagneticfieldstrengthandprocessingpipelineinsystemiclupuserythematosus AT correiamartam sensitivityofdiffusionmritowhitematterpathologyinfluenceofdiffusionprotocolmagneticfieldstrengthandprocessingpipelineinsystemiclupuserythematosus AT sundgrenpiac sensitivityofdiffusionmritowhitematterpathologyinfluenceofdiffusionprotocolmagneticfieldstrengthandprocessingpipelineinsystemiclupuserythematosus AT nilssonmarkus sensitivityofdiffusionmritowhitematterpathologyinfluenceofdiffusionprotocolmagneticfieldstrengthandprocessingpipelineinsystemiclupuserythematosus |