Cargando…

Propofol total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for acute postoperative pain in patients with morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a large-scale retrospective study with covariate adjustment

BACKGROUND: To compare the postoperative analgesic effect of propofol total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) versus inhalational anaesthesia (GAS) in patients using morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a single tertiary university hospital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Stanley Sau Ching, Choi, Edward Kwok Yiu, Chan, Wing Shing, Cheung, Chi Wai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9088064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01683-9
_version_ 1784704289668595712
author Wong, Stanley Sau Ching
Choi, Edward Kwok Yiu
Chan, Wing Shing
Cheung, Chi Wai
author_facet Wong, Stanley Sau Ching
Choi, Edward Kwok Yiu
Chan, Wing Shing
Cheung, Chi Wai
author_sort Wong, Stanley Sau Ching
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the postoperative analgesic effect of propofol total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) versus inhalational anaesthesia (GAS) in patients using morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a single tertiary university hospital. Adult patients who used PCA morphine after general anaesthesia across 15 types of surgeries were included. Patients who received propofol TIVA were compared to those who had inhalational anaesthesia. Primary outcomes assessed were postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption. RESULTS: Data from 4202 patients were analysed. The overall adjusted NRS pain scores were significantly lower in patients who received propofol TIVA at rest (GEE: β estimate of the mean on a 0 to 10 scale = -0.56, 95% CI = (-0.74 to -0.38), p < 0.001; GAS as reference group) and with movement (β estimate = -0.89, 95% CI = (-1.1 to -0.69), p < 0.001) from postoperative days (POD) 1–3. Propofol TIVA was associated with lower overall adjusted postoperative morphine consumption (β estimate = -3.45, 95% CI = (-4.46 to -2.44), p < 0.001). Patients with propofol TIVA had lower adjusted NRS pain scores with movement for hepatobiliary/pancreatic (p < 0.001), upper gastrointestinal (p < 0.001) and urological surgeries (p = 0.005); and less adjusted postoperative morphine consumption for hepatobiliary/pancreatic (p < 0.001), upper gastrointestinal (p = 0.006) and urological surgeries (p = 0.002). There were no differences for other types of surgeries. CONCLUSION: Propofol TIVA was associated with statistically significant, but small reduction in pain scores and opioid consumption in patients using PCA morphine. Subgroup analysis suggests clinically meaningful analgesia possibly for hepatobiliary/pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal surgeries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03875872). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01683-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9088064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90880642022-05-11 Propofol total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for acute postoperative pain in patients with morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a large-scale retrospective study with covariate adjustment Wong, Stanley Sau Ching Choi, Edward Kwok Yiu Chan, Wing Shing Cheung, Chi Wai BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: To compare the postoperative analgesic effect of propofol total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) versus inhalational anaesthesia (GAS) in patients using morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a single tertiary university hospital. Adult patients who used PCA morphine after general anaesthesia across 15 types of surgeries were included. Patients who received propofol TIVA were compared to those who had inhalational anaesthesia. Primary outcomes assessed were postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption. RESULTS: Data from 4202 patients were analysed. The overall adjusted NRS pain scores were significantly lower in patients who received propofol TIVA at rest (GEE: β estimate of the mean on a 0 to 10 scale = -0.56, 95% CI = (-0.74 to -0.38), p < 0.001; GAS as reference group) and with movement (β estimate = -0.89, 95% CI = (-1.1 to -0.69), p < 0.001) from postoperative days (POD) 1–3. Propofol TIVA was associated with lower overall adjusted postoperative morphine consumption (β estimate = -3.45, 95% CI = (-4.46 to -2.44), p < 0.001). Patients with propofol TIVA had lower adjusted NRS pain scores with movement for hepatobiliary/pancreatic (p < 0.001), upper gastrointestinal (p < 0.001) and urological surgeries (p = 0.005); and less adjusted postoperative morphine consumption for hepatobiliary/pancreatic (p < 0.001), upper gastrointestinal (p = 0.006) and urological surgeries (p = 0.002). There were no differences for other types of surgeries. CONCLUSION: Propofol TIVA was associated with statistically significant, but small reduction in pain scores and opioid consumption in patients using PCA morphine. Subgroup analysis suggests clinically meaningful analgesia possibly for hepatobiliary/pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal surgeries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03875872). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01683-9. BioMed Central 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9088064/ /pubmed/35538421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01683-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wong, Stanley Sau Ching
Choi, Edward Kwok Yiu
Chan, Wing Shing
Cheung, Chi Wai
Propofol total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for acute postoperative pain in patients with morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a large-scale retrospective study with covariate adjustment
title Propofol total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for acute postoperative pain in patients with morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a large-scale retrospective study with covariate adjustment
title_full Propofol total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for acute postoperative pain in patients with morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a large-scale retrospective study with covariate adjustment
title_fullStr Propofol total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for acute postoperative pain in patients with morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a large-scale retrospective study with covariate adjustment
title_full_unstemmed Propofol total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for acute postoperative pain in patients with morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a large-scale retrospective study with covariate adjustment
title_short Propofol total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for acute postoperative pain in patients with morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a large-scale retrospective study with covariate adjustment
title_sort propofol total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for acute postoperative pain in patients with morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a large-scale retrospective study with covariate adjustment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9088064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01683-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wongstanleysauching propofoltotalintravenousanaesthesiaversusinhalationalanaesthesiaforacutepostoperativepaininpatientswithmorphinepatientcontrolledanalgesiaalargescaleretrospectivestudywithcovariateadjustment
AT choiedwardkwokyiu propofoltotalintravenousanaesthesiaversusinhalationalanaesthesiaforacutepostoperativepaininpatientswithmorphinepatientcontrolledanalgesiaalargescaleretrospectivestudywithcovariateadjustment
AT chanwingshing propofoltotalintravenousanaesthesiaversusinhalationalanaesthesiaforacutepostoperativepaininpatientswithmorphinepatientcontrolledanalgesiaalargescaleretrospectivestudywithcovariateadjustment
AT cheungchiwai propofoltotalintravenousanaesthesiaversusinhalationalanaesthesiaforacutepostoperativepaininpatientswithmorphinepatientcontrolledanalgesiaalargescaleretrospectivestudywithcovariateadjustment