Cargando…
Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein‐binding peptides
Despite advances in protein engineering, the de novo design of small proteins or peptides that bind to a desired target remains a difficult task. Most computational methods search for binder structures in a library of candidate scaffolds, which can lead to designs with poor target complementarity an...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9088223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.4322 |
_version_ | 1784704322088468480 |
---|---|
author | Swanson, Sebastian Sivaraman, Venkatesh Grigoryan, Gevorg Keating, Amy E. |
author_facet | Swanson, Sebastian Sivaraman, Venkatesh Grigoryan, Gevorg Keating, Amy E. |
author_sort | Swanson, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite advances in protein engineering, the de novo design of small proteins or peptides that bind to a desired target remains a difficult task. Most computational methods search for binder structures in a library of candidate scaffolds, which can lead to designs with poor target complementarity and low success rates. Instead of choosing from pre‐defined scaffolds, we propose that custom peptide structures can be constructed to complement a target surface. Our method mines tertiary motifs (TERMs) from known structures to identify surface‐complementing fragments or “seeds.” We combine seeds that satisfy geometric overlap criteria to generate peptide backbones and score the backbones to identify the most likely binding structures. We found that TERM‐based seeds can describe known binding structures with high resolution: the vast majority of peptide binders from 486 peptide‐protein complexes can be covered by seeds generated from single‐chain structures. Furthermore, we demonstrate that known peptide structures can be reconstructed with high accuracy from peptide‐covering seeds. As a proof of concept, we used our method to design 100 peptide binders of TRAF6, seven of which were predicted by Rosetta to form higher‐quality interfaces than a native binder. The designed peptides interact with distinct sites on TRAF6, including the native peptide‐binding site. These results demonstrate that known peptide‐binding structures can be constructed from TERMs in single‐chain structures and suggest that TERM information can be applied to efficiently design novel target‐complementing binders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9088223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90882232022-05-16 Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein‐binding peptides Swanson, Sebastian Sivaraman, Venkatesh Grigoryan, Gevorg Keating, Amy E. Protein Sci Full‐length Papers Despite advances in protein engineering, the de novo design of small proteins or peptides that bind to a desired target remains a difficult task. Most computational methods search for binder structures in a library of candidate scaffolds, which can lead to designs with poor target complementarity and low success rates. Instead of choosing from pre‐defined scaffolds, we propose that custom peptide structures can be constructed to complement a target surface. Our method mines tertiary motifs (TERMs) from known structures to identify surface‐complementing fragments or “seeds.” We combine seeds that satisfy geometric overlap criteria to generate peptide backbones and score the backbones to identify the most likely binding structures. We found that TERM‐based seeds can describe known binding structures with high resolution: the vast majority of peptide binders from 486 peptide‐protein complexes can be covered by seeds generated from single‐chain structures. Furthermore, we demonstrate that known peptide structures can be reconstructed with high accuracy from peptide‐covering seeds. As a proof of concept, we used our method to design 100 peptide binders of TRAF6, seven of which were predicted by Rosetta to form higher‐quality interfaces than a native binder. The designed peptides interact with distinct sites on TRAF6, including the native peptide‐binding site. These results demonstrate that known peptide‐binding structures can be constructed from TERMs in single‐chain structures and suggest that TERM information can be applied to efficiently design novel target‐complementing binders. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-05-10 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9088223/ /pubmed/35634780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.4322 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Protein Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Protein Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Full‐length Papers Swanson, Sebastian Sivaraman, Venkatesh Grigoryan, Gevorg Keating, Amy E. Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein‐binding peptides |
title | Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein‐binding peptides |
title_full | Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein‐binding peptides |
title_fullStr | Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein‐binding peptides |
title_full_unstemmed | Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein‐binding peptides |
title_short | Tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein‐binding peptides |
title_sort | tertiary motifs as building blocks for the design of protein‐binding peptides |
topic | Full‐length Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9088223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.4322 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swansonsebastian tertiarymotifsasbuildingblocksforthedesignofproteinbindingpeptides AT sivaramanvenkatesh tertiarymotifsasbuildingblocksforthedesignofproteinbindingpeptides AT grigoryangevorg tertiarymotifsasbuildingblocksforthedesignofproteinbindingpeptides AT keatingamye tertiarymotifsasbuildingblocksforthedesignofproteinbindingpeptides |