Cargando…

Measuring Tuberculosis Medication Adherence: A Comparison of Multiple Approaches in Relation to Urine Isoniazid Metabolite Testing Within a Cohort Study in India

BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to tuberculosis medications is associated with poor outcomes. However, measuring adherence in practice is challenging. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of multiple tuberculosis adherence measures. METHODS: We enrolled adult Indians with drug-susceptible tuberculosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Subbaraman, Ramnath, Thomas, Beena E, Kumar, J Vignesh, Lubeck-Schricker, Maya, Khandewale, Amit, Thies, William, Eliasziw, Misha, Mayer, Kenneth H, Haberer, Jessica E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9088502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35559123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab532
_version_ 1784704347038285824
author Subbaraman, Ramnath
Thomas, Beena E
Kumar, J Vignesh
Lubeck-Schricker, Maya
Khandewale, Amit
Thies, William
Eliasziw, Misha
Mayer, Kenneth H
Haberer, Jessica E
author_facet Subbaraman, Ramnath
Thomas, Beena E
Kumar, J Vignesh
Lubeck-Schricker, Maya
Khandewale, Amit
Thies, William
Eliasziw, Misha
Mayer, Kenneth H
Haberer, Jessica E
author_sort Subbaraman, Ramnath
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to tuberculosis medications is associated with poor outcomes. However, measuring adherence in practice is challenging. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of multiple tuberculosis adherence measures. METHODS: We enrolled adult Indians with drug-susceptible tuberculosis who were monitored using 99DOTS, a cellphone-based technology. During an unannounced home visit with each participant, we assessed adherence using a pill estimate, 4-day dose recall, a last missed dose question, and urine isoniazid metabolite testing. We estimated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each alternate measure in comparison to urine testing. 99DOTS data were analyzed using patient-reported doses alone and patient- and provider-reported doses, the latter reflecting how 99DOTS is implemented in practice. We assessed each measure’s operating characteristics, with particular interest in specificity—that is, the percentage of participants detected as being nonadherent by each alternate measure, among those who were nonadherent by urine testing. RESULTS: Compared with urine testing, alternate measures had the following characteristics: 99DOTS patient-reported doses alone (area under the curve [AUC], 0.65; specificity, 70%; 95% CI, 58%–81%), 99DOTS patient- and provider-reported doses (AUC, 0.61; specificity, 33%; 95% CI, 22%–45%), pill estimate (AUC, 0.55; specificity, 21%; 95% CI, 12%–32%), 4-day recall (AUC, 0.60; specificity, 23%; 95% CI, 14%–34%), and last missed dose question (AUC, 0.65; specificity, 52%; 95% CI, 40%–63%). CONCLUSIONS: Alternate measures missed detecting at least 30% of people who were nonadherent by urine testing. The last missed dose question performed similarly to 99DOTS using patient-reported doses alone. Tuberculosis programs should evaluate the feasibility of integrating more accurate, objective measures, such as urine testing, into routine care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9088502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90885022022-05-11 Measuring Tuberculosis Medication Adherence: A Comparison of Multiple Approaches in Relation to Urine Isoniazid Metabolite Testing Within a Cohort Study in India Subbaraman, Ramnath Thomas, Beena E Kumar, J Vignesh Lubeck-Schricker, Maya Khandewale, Amit Thies, William Eliasziw, Misha Mayer, Kenneth H Haberer, Jessica E Open Forum Infect Dis Major Articles BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to tuberculosis medications is associated with poor outcomes. However, measuring adherence in practice is challenging. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of multiple tuberculosis adherence measures. METHODS: We enrolled adult Indians with drug-susceptible tuberculosis who were monitored using 99DOTS, a cellphone-based technology. During an unannounced home visit with each participant, we assessed adherence using a pill estimate, 4-day dose recall, a last missed dose question, and urine isoniazid metabolite testing. We estimated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each alternate measure in comparison to urine testing. 99DOTS data were analyzed using patient-reported doses alone and patient- and provider-reported doses, the latter reflecting how 99DOTS is implemented in practice. We assessed each measure’s operating characteristics, with particular interest in specificity—that is, the percentage of participants detected as being nonadherent by each alternate measure, among those who were nonadherent by urine testing. RESULTS: Compared with urine testing, alternate measures had the following characteristics: 99DOTS patient-reported doses alone (area under the curve [AUC], 0.65; specificity, 70%; 95% CI, 58%–81%), 99DOTS patient- and provider-reported doses (AUC, 0.61; specificity, 33%; 95% CI, 22%–45%), pill estimate (AUC, 0.55; specificity, 21%; 95% CI, 12%–32%), 4-day recall (AUC, 0.60; specificity, 23%; 95% CI, 14%–34%), and last missed dose question (AUC, 0.65; specificity, 52%; 95% CI, 40%–63%). CONCLUSIONS: Alternate measures missed detecting at least 30% of people who were nonadherent by urine testing. The last missed dose question performed similarly to 99DOTS using patient-reported doses alone. Tuberculosis programs should evaluate the feasibility of integrating more accurate, objective measures, such as urine testing, into routine care. Oxford University Press 2021-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9088502/ /pubmed/35559123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab532 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Major Articles
Subbaraman, Ramnath
Thomas, Beena E
Kumar, J Vignesh
Lubeck-Schricker, Maya
Khandewale, Amit
Thies, William
Eliasziw, Misha
Mayer, Kenneth H
Haberer, Jessica E
Measuring Tuberculosis Medication Adherence: A Comparison of Multiple Approaches in Relation to Urine Isoniazid Metabolite Testing Within a Cohort Study in India
title Measuring Tuberculosis Medication Adherence: A Comparison of Multiple Approaches in Relation to Urine Isoniazid Metabolite Testing Within a Cohort Study in India
title_full Measuring Tuberculosis Medication Adherence: A Comparison of Multiple Approaches in Relation to Urine Isoniazid Metabolite Testing Within a Cohort Study in India
title_fullStr Measuring Tuberculosis Medication Adherence: A Comparison of Multiple Approaches in Relation to Urine Isoniazid Metabolite Testing Within a Cohort Study in India
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Tuberculosis Medication Adherence: A Comparison of Multiple Approaches in Relation to Urine Isoniazid Metabolite Testing Within a Cohort Study in India
title_short Measuring Tuberculosis Medication Adherence: A Comparison of Multiple Approaches in Relation to Urine Isoniazid Metabolite Testing Within a Cohort Study in India
title_sort measuring tuberculosis medication adherence: a comparison of multiple approaches in relation to urine isoniazid metabolite testing within a cohort study in india
topic Major Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9088502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35559123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab532
work_keys_str_mv AT subbaramanramnath measuringtuberculosismedicationadherenceacomparisonofmultipleapproachesinrelationtourineisoniazidmetabolitetestingwithinacohortstudyinindia
AT thomasbeenae measuringtuberculosismedicationadherenceacomparisonofmultipleapproachesinrelationtourineisoniazidmetabolitetestingwithinacohortstudyinindia
AT kumarjvignesh measuringtuberculosismedicationadherenceacomparisonofmultipleapproachesinrelationtourineisoniazidmetabolitetestingwithinacohortstudyinindia
AT lubeckschrickermaya measuringtuberculosismedicationadherenceacomparisonofmultipleapproachesinrelationtourineisoniazidmetabolitetestingwithinacohortstudyinindia
AT khandewaleamit measuringtuberculosismedicationadherenceacomparisonofmultipleapproachesinrelationtourineisoniazidmetabolitetestingwithinacohortstudyinindia
AT thieswilliam measuringtuberculosismedicationadherenceacomparisonofmultipleapproachesinrelationtourineisoniazidmetabolitetestingwithinacohortstudyinindia
AT eliasziwmisha measuringtuberculosismedicationadherenceacomparisonofmultipleapproachesinrelationtourineisoniazidmetabolitetestingwithinacohortstudyinindia
AT mayerkennethh measuringtuberculosismedicationadherenceacomparisonofmultipleapproachesinrelationtourineisoniazidmetabolitetestingwithinacohortstudyinindia
AT habererjessicae measuringtuberculosismedicationadherenceacomparisonofmultipleapproachesinrelationtourineisoniazidmetabolitetestingwithinacohortstudyinindia