Cargando…

Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically Competitive Electron Transfers

[Image: see text] Stabilization of ions and radicals often determines reaction kinetics and thermodynamics, but experimental determination of the stabilization magnitude remains difficult, especially when the species is short-lived. Herein, a competitive kinetic approach to quantify the stabilizatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deetz, Alexander M., Meyer, Gerald J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9088780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35557754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00088
_version_ 1784704381789143040
author Deetz, Alexander M.
Meyer, Gerald J.
author_facet Deetz, Alexander M.
Meyer, Gerald J.
author_sort Deetz, Alexander M.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Stabilization of ions and radicals often determines reaction kinetics and thermodynamics, but experimental determination of the stabilization magnitude remains difficult, especially when the species is short-lived. Herein, a competitive kinetic approach to quantify the stabilization of a halide ion toward oxidation imparted by specific stabilizing groups relative to a solvated halide ion is reported. This approach provides the increase in the formal reduction potential, ΔE°′(Χ(•/–)), where X = Br and I, that results from the noncovalent interaction with stabilizing groups. The [Ir(dF-(CF(3))-ppy)(2)(tmam)](3+) photocatalyst features a dicationic ligand tmam [4,4′-bis[(trimethylamino)methyl]-2,2′-bipyridine](2+) that is shown by (1)H NMR spectroscopy to associate a single halide ion, K(eq) = 7 × 10(4) M(–1) (Br(–)) and K(eq) = 1 × 10(4) M(–1) (I(–)). Light excitation of the photocatalyst in halide-containing acetonitrile solutions results in competitive quenching by the stabilized halide and the more easily oxidized diffusing halide ion. Marcus theory is used to relate the rate constants to the electron-transfer driving forces for oxidation of the stabilized and unstabilized halide, the difference of which provides the increase in reduction potentials of ΔE°′(Br(•/–)) = 150 ± 24 meV and ΔE°′(I(•/–)) = 67 ± 13 meV. The data reveal that K(eq) is a poor indicator of these reduction potential shifts. Furthermore, the historic and widely used assumption that Coulombic interactions alone are responsible for stabilization must be reconsidered, at least for polarizable halogens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9088780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90887802022-05-11 Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically Competitive Electron Transfers Deetz, Alexander M. Meyer, Gerald J. JACS Au [Image: see text] Stabilization of ions and radicals often determines reaction kinetics and thermodynamics, but experimental determination of the stabilization magnitude remains difficult, especially when the species is short-lived. Herein, a competitive kinetic approach to quantify the stabilization of a halide ion toward oxidation imparted by specific stabilizing groups relative to a solvated halide ion is reported. This approach provides the increase in the formal reduction potential, ΔE°′(Χ(•/–)), where X = Br and I, that results from the noncovalent interaction with stabilizing groups. The [Ir(dF-(CF(3))-ppy)(2)(tmam)](3+) photocatalyst features a dicationic ligand tmam [4,4′-bis[(trimethylamino)methyl]-2,2′-bipyridine](2+) that is shown by (1)H NMR spectroscopy to associate a single halide ion, K(eq) = 7 × 10(4) M(–1) (Br(–)) and K(eq) = 1 × 10(4) M(–1) (I(–)). Light excitation of the photocatalyst in halide-containing acetonitrile solutions results in competitive quenching by the stabilized halide and the more easily oxidized diffusing halide ion. Marcus theory is used to relate the rate constants to the electron-transfer driving forces for oxidation of the stabilized and unstabilized halide, the difference of which provides the increase in reduction potentials of ΔE°′(Br(•/–)) = 150 ± 24 meV and ΔE°′(I(•/–)) = 67 ± 13 meV. The data reveal that K(eq) is a poor indicator of these reduction potential shifts. Furthermore, the historic and widely used assumption that Coulombic interactions alone are responsible for stabilization must be reconsidered, at least for polarizable halogens. American Chemical Society 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9088780/ /pubmed/35557754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00088 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Deetz, Alexander M.
Meyer, Gerald J.
Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically Competitive Electron Transfers
title Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically Competitive Electron Transfers
title_full Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically Competitive Electron Transfers
title_fullStr Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically Competitive Electron Transfers
title_full_unstemmed Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically Competitive Electron Transfers
title_short Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically Competitive Electron Transfers
title_sort resolving halide ion stabilization through kinetically competitive electron transfers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9088780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35557754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00088
work_keys_str_mv AT deetzalexanderm resolvinghalideionstabilizationthroughkineticallycompetitiveelectrontransfers
AT meyergeraldj resolvinghalideionstabilizationthroughkineticallycompetitiveelectrontransfers