Cargando…
Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically Competitive Electron Transfers
[Image: see text] Stabilization of ions and radicals often determines reaction kinetics and thermodynamics, but experimental determination of the stabilization magnitude remains difficult, especially when the species is short-lived. Herein, a competitive kinetic approach to quantify the stabilizatio...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9088780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35557754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00088 |
_version_ | 1784704381789143040 |
---|---|
author | Deetz, Alexander M. Meyer, Gerald J. |
author_facet | Deetz, Alexander M. Meyer, Gerald J. |
author_sort | Deetz, Alexander M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Stabilization of ions and radicals often determines reaction kinetics and thermodynamics, but experimental determination of the stabilization magnitude remains difficult, especially when the species is short-lived. Herein, a competitive kinetic approach to quantify the stabilization of a halide ion toward oxidation imparted by specific stabilizing groups relative to a solvated halide ion is reported. This approach provides the increase in the formal reduction potential, ΔE°′(Χ(•/–)), where X = Br and I, that results from the noncovalent interaction with stabilizing groups. The [Ir(dF-(CF(3))-ppy)(2)(tmam)](3+) photocatalyst features a dicationic ligand tmam [4,4′-bis[(trimethylamino)methyl]-2,2′-bipyridine](2+) that is shown by (1)H NMR spectroscopy to associate a single halide ion, K(eq) = 7 × 10(4) M(–1) (Br(–)) and K(eq) = 1 × 10(4) M(–1) (I(–)). Light excitation of the photocatalyst in halide-containing acetonitrile solutions results in competitive quenching by the stabilized halide and the more easily oxidized diffusing halide ion. Marcus theory is used to relate the rate constants to the electron-transfer driving forces for oxidation of the stabilized and unstabilized halide, the difference of which provides the increase in reduction potentials of ΔE°′(Br(•/–)) = 150 ± 24 meV and ΔE°′(I(•/–)) = 67 ± 13 meV. The data reveal that K(eq) is a poor indicator of these reduction potential shifts. Furthermore, the historic and widely used assumption that Coulombic interactions alone are responsible for stabilization must be reconsidered, at least for polarizable halogens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9088780 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90887802022-05-11 Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically Competitive Electron Transfers Deetz, Alexander M. Meyer, Gerald J. JACS Au [Image: see text] Stabilization of ions and radicals often determines reaction kinetics and thermodynamics, but experimental determination of the stabilization magnitude remains difficult, especially when the species is short-lived. Herein, a competitive kinetic approach to quantify the stabilization of a halide ion toward oxidation imparted by specific stabilizing groups relative to a solvated halide ion is reported. This approach provides the increase in the formal reduction potential, ΔE°′(Χ(•/–)), where X = Br and I, that results from the noncovalent interaction with stabilizing groups. The [Ir(dF-(CF(3))-ppy)(2)(tmam)](3+) photocatalyst features a dicationic ligand tmam [4,4′-bis[(trimethylamino)methyl]-2,2′-bipyridine](2+) that is shown by (1)H NMR spectroscopy to associate a single halide ion, K(eq) = 7 × 10(4) M(–1) (Br(–)) and K(eq) = 1 × 10(4) M(–1) (I(–)). Light excitation of the photocatalyst in halide-containing acetonitrile solutions results in competitive quenching by the stabilized halide and the more easily oxidized diffusing halide ion. Marcus theory is used to relate the rate constants to the electron-transfer driving forces for oxidation of the stabilized and unstabilized halide, the difference of which provides the increase in reduction potentials of ΔE°′(Br(•/–)) = 150 ± 24 meV and ΔE°′(I(•/–)) = 67 ± 13 meV. The data reveal that K(eq) is a poor indicator of these reduction potential shifts. Furthermore, the historic and widely used assumption that Coulombic interactions alone are responsible for stabilization must be reconsidered, at least for polarizable halogens. American Chemical Society 2022-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9088780/ /pubmed/35557754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00088 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Deetz, Alexander M. Meyer, Gerald J. Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically Competitive Electron Transfers |
title | Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically
Competitive Electron Transfers |
title_full | Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically
Competitive Electron Transfers |
title_fullStr | Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically
Competitive Electron Transfers |
title_full_unstemmed | Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically
Competitive Electron Transfers |
title_short | Resolving Halide Ion Stabilization through Kinetically
Competitive Electron Transfers |
title_sort | resolving halide ion stabilization through kinetically
competitive electron transfers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9088780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35557754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deetzalexanderm resolvinghalideionstabilizationthroughkineticallycompetitiveelectrontransfers AT meyergeraldj resolvinghalideionstabilizationthroughkineticallycompetitiveelectrontransfers |