Cargando…

Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China

BACKGROUND: An optimal risk‐scoring system enables more targeted offers for colonoscopy in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. This analysis aims to develop and validate scoring systems using parametric and non‐parametric methods for average‐risk populations. METHODS: Screening data of 807,695 subjec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Wei‐Miao, Gu, Kai, Yang, Yi‐Hui, Bao, Ping‐Ping, Gong, Yang‐Ming, Shi, Yan, Xu, Wang‐Hong, Fu, Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35274820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4576
_version_ 1784704475707998208
author Wu, Wei‐Miao
Gu, Kai
Yang, Yi‐Hui
Bao, Ping‐Ping
Gong, Yang‐Ming
Shi, Yan
Xu, Wang‐Hong
Fu, Chen
author_facet Wu, Wei‐Miao
Gu, Kai
Yang, Yi‐Hui
Bao, Ping‐Ping
Gong, Yang‐Ming
Shi, Yan
Xu, Wang‐Hong
Fu, Chen
author_sort Wu, Wei‐Miao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An optimal risk‐scoring system enables more targeted offers for colonoscopy in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. This analysis aims to develop and validate scoring systems using parametric and non‐parametric methods for average‐risk populations. METHODS: Screening data of 807,695 subjects and 2806 detected cases in the first‐round CRC screening program in Shanghai were used to develop risk‐predictive models and scoring systems using logistic‐regression (LR) and artificial‐neural‐network (ANN) methods. Performance of established scoring systems was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, sensitivity, specificity, number of high‐risk individuals and potential detection rates of CRC. RESULTS: Age, sex, CRC in first‐degree relatives, chronic diarrhoea, mucus or bloody stool, history of any cancer and faecal‐immunochemical‐test (FIT) results were identified as predictors for the presence of CRC. The AUC of LR‐based system was 0.642 when using risk factors only in derivation set, and increased to 0.774 by further incorporating one‐sample FIT results, and to 0.808 by including two‐sample FIT results, while those for ANN‐based systems were 0.639, 0.763 and 0.805, respectively. Better calibrations were observed for the LR‐based systems than the ANN‐based ones. Compared with the currently used initial tests, parallel use of FIT with LR‐based systems resulted in improved specificities, less demands for colonoscopy and higher detection rates of CRC, while parallel use of FIT with ANN‐based systems had higher sensitivities; incorporating FIT in the scoring systems further increased specificities, decreased colonoscopy demands and improved detection rates of CRC. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate the potentials of LR‐based scoring systems incorporating one‐ or two‐sample FIT results for CRC mass screening. External validation is warranted for scaling‐up implementation in the Chinese population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9089226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90892262022-05-16 Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China Wu, Wei‐Miao Gu, Kai Yang, Yi‐Hui Bao, Ping‐Ping Gong, Yang‐Ming Shi, Yan Xu, Wang‐Hong Fu, Chen Cancer Med Cancer Prevention BACKGROUND: An optimal risk‐scoring system enables more targeted offers for colonoscopy in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. This analysis aims to develop and validate scoring systems using parametric and non‐parametric methods for average‐risk populations. METHODS: Screening data of 807,695 subjects and 2806 detected cases in the first‐round CRC screening program in Shanghai were used to develop risk‐predictive models and scoring systems using logistic‐regression (LR) and artificial‐neural‐network (ANN) methods. Performance of established scoring systems was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, sensitivity, specificity, number of high‐risk individuals and potential detection rates of CRC. RESULTS: Age, sex, CRC in first‐degree relatives, chronic diarrhoea, mucus or bloody stool, history of any cancer and faecal‐immunochemical‐test (FIT) results were identified as predictors for the presence of CRC. The AUC of LR‐based system was 0.642 when using risk factors only in derivation set, and increased to 0.774 by further incorporating one‐sample FIT results, and to 0.808 by including two‐sample FIT results, while those for ANN‐based systems were 0.639, 0.763 and 0.805, respectively. Better calibrations were observed for the LR‐based systems than the ANN‐based ones. Compared with the currently used initial tests, parallel use of FIT with LR‐based systems resulted in improved specificities, less demands for colonoscopy and higher detection rates of CRC, while parallel use of FIT with ANN‐based systems had higher sensitivities; incorporating FIT in the scoring systems further increased specificities, decreased colonoscopy demands and improved detection rates of CRC. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate the potentials of LR‐based scoring systems incorporating one‐ or two‐sample FIT results for CRC mass screening. External validation is warranted for scaling‐up implementation in the Chinese population. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9089226/ /pubmed/35274820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4576 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cancer Prevention
Wu, Wei‐Miao
Gu, Kai
Yang, Yi‐Hui
Bao, Ping‐Ping
Gong, Yang‐Ming
Shi, Yan
Xu, Wang‐Hong
Fu, Chen
Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China
title Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China
title_full Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China
title_fullStr Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China
title_full_unstemmed Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China
title_short Improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China
title_sort improved risk scoring systems for colorectal cancer screening in shanghai, china
topic Cancer Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35274820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4576
work_keys_str_mv AT wuweimiao improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina
AT gukai improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina
AT yangyihui improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina
AT baopingping improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina
AT gongyangming improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina
AT shiyan improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina
AT xuwanghong improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina
AT fuchen improvedriskscoringsystemsforcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichina