Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study

AIMS: The study was aimed to evaluate and compare the compressive, diametral tensile, and flexural strengths of three different commercial resin based core materials and to single out the best resin-based core build-up material with respect to their physical properties among ParaCore® (Coltene Whale...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Ankita, Shetty, Prashant Purandhar, Ali, Afzal, Bhardwaj, Monika, Dubey, Deepa, Chhabra, Swati
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35558666
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_529_21
_version_ 1784704583437647872
author Sharma, Ankita
Shetty, Prashant Purandhar
Ali, Afzal
Bhardwaj, Monika
Dubey, Deepa
Chhabra, Swati
author_facet Sharma, Ankita
Shetty, Prashant Purandhar
Ali, Afzal
Bhardwaj, Monika
Dubey, Deepa
Chhabra, Swati
author_sort Sharma, Ankita
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The study was aimed to evaluate and compare the compressive, diametral tensile, and flexural strengths of three different commercial resin based core materials and to single out the best resin-based core build-up material with respect to their physical properties among ParaCore® (Coltene Whaledent, USA), FlouroCore® 2+ (Dentsply International, USA), MultiCore® (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) with Miracle Mix® (GC America) core used as control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty samples were prepared, of which forty samples (10 of each material) were prepared in cylindrical stainless steel molds (height 6 mm, diameter 4 mm) for compressive strength measurements. Other forty samples (10 of each material) were prepared in cylindrical molds (diameter 6 mm, height 2 mm) for diametral tensile strength measurements. Forty samples (10 of each material) were prepared in stainless steel molds cuboidal in shape (length 25 mm, thickness 2 mm, and width 2 mm) for flexural strength measurements. The samples were tested on a Universal testing machine (Instron Machine 3366, made in the USA). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way analysis of variance was performed to determine any statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) among the resin-based core build-up materials with respect to their three respective strengths. Further, the statistical comparison was made among the four materials using Student's t-test at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Based on the results obtained it can be summarized that the ParaCore is the strongest material among all the four materials, followed by MultiCore, FlouroCore2+, and Miracle Mix. The Miracle mix is the weakest among all the materials owing to its inferior strength values. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study imply that, in consideration of their superior strength values, resin-based core build-up materials, ParaCore, MultiCore, and FlouroCore2+ should be a preferred for use as core build-up material over Miracle Mix in specific clinical situations, in the same order of preference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9089769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90897692022-05-11 Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study Sharma, Ankita Shetty, Prashant Purandhar Ali, Afzal Bhardwaj, Monika Dubey, Deepa Chhabra, Swati J Conserv Dent Original Article AIMS: The study was aimed to evaluate and compare the compressive, diametral tensile, and flexural strengths of three different commercial resin based core materials and to single out the best resin-based core build-up material with respect to their physical properties among ParaCore® (Coltene Whaledent, USA), FlouroCore® 2+ (Dentsply International, USA), MultiCore® (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) with Miracle Mix® (GC America) core used as control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty samples were prepared, of which forty samples (10 of each material) were prepared in cylindrical stainless steel molds (height 6 mm, diameter 4 mm) for compressive strength measurements. Other forty samples (10 of each material) were prepared in cylindrical molds (diameter 6 mm, height 2 mm) for diametral tensile strength measurements. Forty samples (10 of each material) were prepared in stainless steel molds cuboidal in shape (length 25 mm, thickness 2 mm, and width 2 mm) for flexural strength measurements. The samples were tested on a Universal testing machine (Instron Machine 3366, made in the USA). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way analysis of variance was performed to determine any statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) among the resin-based core build-up materials with respect to their three respective strengths. Further, the statistical comparison was made among the four materials using Student's t-test at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Based on the results obtained it can be summarized that the ParaCore is the strongest material among all the four materials, followed by MultiCore, FlouroCore2+, and Miracle Mix. The Miracle mix is the weakest among all the materials owing to its inferior strength values. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study imply that, in consideration of their superior strength values, resin-based core build-up materials, ParaCore, MultiCore, and FlouroCore2+ should be a preferred for use as core build-up material over Miracle Mix in specific clinical situations, in the same order of preference. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9089769/ /pubmed/35558666 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_529_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Ankita
Shetty, Prashant Purandhar
Ali, Afzal
Bhardwaj, Monika
Dubey, Deepa
Chhabra, Swati
Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study
title Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35558666
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_529_21
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaankita comparativeevaluationofthecompressivetensileandflexuralstrengthsofparacoreflourocore2andmulticoreresinbasedcorebuildupmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT shettyprashantpurandhar comparativeevaluationofthecompressivetensileandflexuralstrengthsofparacoreflourocore2andmulticoreresinbasedcorebuildupmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT aliafzal comparativeevaluationofthecompressivetensileandflexuralstrengthsofparacoreflourocore2andmulticoreresinbasedcorebuildupmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT bhardwajmonika comparativeevaluationofthecompressivetensileandflexuralstrengthsofparacoreflourocore2andmulticoreresinbasedcorebuildupmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT dubeydeepa comparativeevaluationofthecompressivetensileandflexuralstrengthsofparacoreflourocore2andmulticoreresinbasedcorebuildupmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT chhabraswati comparativeevaluationofthecompressivetensileandflexuralstrengthsofparacoreflourocore2andmulticoreresinbasedcorebuildupmaterialsaninvitrostudy