Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study
AIMS: The study was aimed to evaluate and compare the compressive, diametral tensile, and flexural strengths of three different commercial resin based core materials and to single out the best resin-based core build-up material with respect to their physical properties among ParaCore® (Coltene Whale...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35558666 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_529_21 |
_version_ | 1784704583437647872 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Ankita Shetty, Prashant Purandhar Ali, Afzal Bhardwaj, Monika Dubey, Deepa Chhabra, Swati |
author_facet | Sharma, Ankita Shetty, Prashant Purandhar Ali, Afzal Bhardwaj, Monika Dubey, Deepa Chhabra, Swati |
author_sort | Sharma, Ankita |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The study was aimed to evaluate and compare the compressive, diametral tensile, and flexural strengths of three different commercial resin based core materials and to single out the best resin-based core build-up material with respect to their physical properties among ParaCore® (Coltene Whaledent, USA), FlouroCore® 2+ (Dentsply International, USA), MultiCore® (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) with Miracle Mix® (GC America) core used as control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty samples were prepared, of which forty samples (10 of each material) were prepared in cylindrical stainless steel molds (height 6 mm, diameter 4 mm) for compressive strength measurements. Other forty samples (10 of each material) were prepared in cylindrical molds (diameter 6 mm, height 2 mm) for diametral tensile strength measurements. Forty samples (10 of each material) were prepared in stainless steel molds cuboidal in shape (length 25 mm, thickness 2 mm, and width 2 mm) for flexural strength measurements. The samples were tested on a Universal testing machine (Instron Machine 3366, made in the USA). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way analysis of variance was performed to determine any statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) among the resin-based core build-up materials with respect to their three respective strengths. Further, the statistical comparison was made among the four materials using Student's t-test at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Based on the results obtained it can be summarized that the ParaCore is the strongest material among all the four materials, followed by MultiCore, FlouroCore2+, and Miracle Mix. The Miracle mix is the weakest among all the materials owing to its inferior strength values. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study imply that, in consideration of their superior strength values, resin-based core build-up materials, ParaCore, MultiCore, and FlouroCore2+ should be a preferred for use as core build-up material over Miracle Mix in specific clinical situations, in the same order of preference. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9089769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90897692022-05-11 Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study Sharma, Ankita Shetty, Prashant Purandhar Ali, Afzal Bhardwaj, Monika Dubey, Deepa Chhabra, Swati J Conserv Dent Original Article AIMS: The study was aimed to evaluate and compare the compressive, diametral tensile, and flexural strengths of three different commercial resin based core materials and to single out the best resin-based core build-up material with respect to their physical properties among ParaCore® (Coltene Whaledent, USA), FlouroCore® 2+ (Dentsply International, USA), MultiCore® (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) with Miracle Mix® (GC America) core used as control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty samples were prepared, of which forty samples (10 of each material) were prepared in cylindrical stainless steel molds (height 6 mm, diameter 4 mm) for compressive strength measurements. Other forty samples (10 of each material) were prepared in cylindrical molds (diameter 6 mm, height 2 mm) for diametral tensile strength measurements. Forty samples (10 of each material) were prepared in stainless steel molds cuboidal in shape (length 25 mm, thickness 2 mm, and width 2 mm) for flexural strength measurements. The samples were tested on a Universal testing machine (Instron Machine 3366, made in the USA). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way analysis of variance was performed to determine any statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) among the resin-based core build-up materials with respect to their three respective strengths. Further, the statistical comparison was made among the four materials using Student's t-test at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Based on the results obtained it can be summarized that the ParaCore is the strongest material among all the four materials, followed by MultiCore, FlouroCore2+, and Miracle Mix. The Miracle mix is the weakest among all the materials owing to its inferior strength values. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study imply that, in consideration of their superior strength values, resin-based core build-up materials, ParaCore, MultiCore, and FlouroCore2+ should be a preferred for use as core build-up material over Miracle Mix in specific clinical situations, in the same order of preference. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9089769/ /pubmed/35558666 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_529_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sharma, Ankita Shetty, Prashant Purandhar Ali, Afzal Bhardwaj, Monika Dubey, Deepa Chhabra, Swati Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study |
title | Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – An in vitro study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials – an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35558666 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_529_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmaankita comparativeevaluationofthecompressivetensileandflexuralstrengthsofparacoreflourocore2andmulticoreresinbasedcorebuildupmaterialsaninvitrostudy AT shettyprashantpurandhar comparativeevaluationofthecompressivetensileandflexuralstrengthsofparacoreflourocore2andmulticoreresinbasedcorebuildupmaterialsaninvitrostudy AT aliafzal comparativeevaluationofthecompressivetensileandflexuralstrengthsofparacoreflourocore2andmulticoreresinbasedcorebuildupmaterialsaninvitrostudy AT bhardwajmonika comparativeevaluationofthecompressivetensileandflexuralstrengthsofparacoreflourocore2andmulticoreresinbasedcorebuildupmaterialsaninvitrostudy AT dubeydeepa comparativeevaluationofthecompressivetensileandflexuralstrengthsofparacoreflourocore2andmulticoreresinbasedcorebuildupmaterialsaninvitrostudy AT chhabraswati comparativeevaluationofthecompressivetensileandflexuralstrengthsofparacoreflourocore2andmulticoreresinbasedcorebuildupmaterialsaninvitrostudy |