Cargando…

Evaluation of debris and smear layer formation using three different NI-TI rotary instrument systems: An in vitro scanning electron microscope study

AIM: The aim of the study is to evaluate of debris and smear layer formation after using rotary ProTaper Universal, Twisted File, and XP Endo file systems under scanning electron microscope. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty freshly extracted mandibular second premolar teeth were taken to decoronate at t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chatterjee, Saikat, Desai, Priti D., Mukherjee, Sayantan, Mazumdar, Paromita, Sengupta, Pritam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35558662
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_510_20
_version_ 1784704585389047808
author Chatterjee, Saikat
Desai, Priti D.
Mukherjee, Sayantan
Mazumdar, Paromita
Sengupta, Pritam
author_facet Chatterjee, Saikat
Desai, Priti D.
Mukherjee, Sayantan
Mazumdar, Paromita
Sengupta, Pritam
author_sort Chatterjee, Saikat
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of the study is to evaluate of debris and smear layer formation after using rotary ProTaper Universal, Twisted File, and XP Endo file systems under scanning electron microscope. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty freshly extracted mandibular second premolar teeth were taken to decoronate at the cementoenamel junction to make the remaining root length 15 mm. Specimens were divided into four groups of 10 teeth each, Group I (control) – no instrumentation. Group II – ProTaper Universal rotary file (F2), Group III – twisted file (ISO size 0.25 and 6% taper), Group IV – XP Endo file (ISO size 0.25). During instrumentation, 5 ml normal saline was used as irrigating agent. Grooves parallel to the longitudinal axis of the root were made on the mesial and distal surface of each specimen to split it into two halves and examined under scanning electron microscope at ×1500 and ×5000 magnification. Photomicrographs were taken to evaluate debris and smear layer. Evaluation of photomicrographs was done using a score index. RESULTS: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare more than one means at a time. Tukey's critical difference followed by ANOVA was used to compare the mean values pair wise. P <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Among all the file systems, Group II showed maximum amount of debris (3.50 ± 1.109) followed by Group III (2.83 ± 1.238) and least amount was showed by Group IV (2.65 ± 1.122) at all levels (cervical, middle, and apical third). Among all the experimental groups, Group II showed maximum amount of smear layer (2.75 ± 1.149) followed by Group III (2.40 ± 0.982) and least amount of smear layer shown by Group IV (2.10 ± 0.841) at all levels (cervical, middle and apical third), the result was statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: At all the levels (cervical third, middle third, and apical third), among all the experimental groups, highest amount of debris and smear layer was formed by ProTaper Universal rotary file followed by Twisted file and least amount showed by XP Endo file system. In all the levels, control group showed highest amount of debris but least amount of smear layer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9089777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90897772022-05-11 Evaluation of debris and smear layer formation using three different NI-TI rotary instrument systems: An in vitro scanning electron microscope study Chatterjee, Saikat Desai, Priti D. Mukherjee, Sayantan Mazumdar, Paromita Sengupta, Pritam J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of the study is to evaluate of debris and smear layer formation after using rotary ProTaper Universal, Twisted File, and XP Endo file systems under scanning electron microscope. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty freshly extracted mandibular second premolar teeth were taken to decoronate at the cementoenamel junction to make the remaining root length 15 mm. Specimens were divided into four groups of 10 teeth each, Group I (control) – no instrumentation. Group II – ProTaper Universal rotary file (F2), Group III – twisted file (ISO size 0.25 and 6% taper), Group IV – XP Endo file (ISO size 0.25). During instrumentation, 5 ml normal saline was used as irrigating agent. Grooves parallel to the longitudinal axis of the root were made on the mesial and distal surface of each specimen to split it into two halves and examined under scanning electron microscope at ×1500 and ×5000 magnification. Photomicrographs were taken to evaluate debris and smear layer. Evaluation of photomicrographs was done using a score index. RESULTS: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare more than one means at a time. Tukey's critical difference followed by ANOVA was used to compare the mean values pair wise. P <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Among all the file systems, Group II showed maximum amount of debris (3.50 ± 1.109) followed by Group III (2.83 ± 1.238) and least amount was showed by Group IV (2.65 ± 1.122) at all levels (cervical, middle, and apical third). Among all the experimental groups, Group II showed maximum amount of smear layer (2.75 ± 1.149) followed by Group III (2.40 ± 0.982) and least amount of smear layer shown by Group IV (2.10 ± 0.841) at all levels (cervical, middle and apical third), the result was statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: At all the levels (cervical third, middle third, and apical third), among all the experimental groups, highest amount of debris and smear layer was formed by ProTaper Universal rotary file followed by Twisted file and least amount showed by XP Endo file system. In all the levels, control group showed highest amount of debris but least amount of smear layer. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9089777/ /pubmed/35558662 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_510_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chatterjee, Saikat
Desai, Priti D.
Mukherjee, Sayantan
Mazumdar, Paromita
Sengupta, Pritam
Evaluation of debris and smear layer formation using three different NI-TI rotary instrument systems: An in vitro scanning electron microscope study
title Evaluation of debris and smear layer formation using three different NI-TI rotary instrument systems: An in vitro scanning electron microscope study
title_full Evaluation of debris and smear layer formation using three different NI-TI rotary instrument systems: An in vitro scanning electron microscope study
title_fullStr Evaluation of debris and smear layer formation using three different NI-TI rotary instrument systems: An in vitro scanning electron microscope study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of debris and smear layer formation using three different NI-TI rotary instrument systems: An in vitro scanning electron microscope study
title_short Evaluation of debris and smear layer formation using three different NI-TI rotary instrument systems: An in vitro scanning electron microscope study
title_sort evaluation of debris and smear layer formation using three different ni-ti rotary instrument systems: an in vitro scanning electron microscope study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35558662
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_510_20
work_keys_str_mv AT chatterjeesaikat evaluationofdebrisandsmearlayerformationusingthreedifferentnitirotaryinstrumentsystemsaninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT desaipritid evaluationofdebrisandsmearlayerformationusingthreedifferentnitirotaryinstrumentsystemsaninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT mukherjeesayantan evaluationofdebrisandsmearlayerformationusingthreedifferentnitirotaryinstrumentsystemsaninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT mazumdarparomita evaluationofdebrisandsmearlayerformationusingthreedifferentnitirotaryinstrumentsystemsaninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT senguptapritam evaluationofdebrisandsmearlayerformationusingthreedifferentnitirotaryinstrumentsystemsaninvitroscanningelectronmicroscopestudy