Cargando…

Interfacial tension and CO(2) diffusion coefficients for a CO(2) + water and n-decane system at pressures of 10 to 160 bar

The objective of this study is to address the influence of different CO(2) phases and degrees of CO(2) saturation on the interfacial tension and the diffusion of CO(2) into a hydrocarbon drop. Axisymmetric drop shape analysis on a pendant drop was used to carry out experiments in a pressure range of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bagalkot, Nikhil, Hamouda, Aly A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35559106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8ra03690j
Descripción
Sumario:The objective of this study is to address the influence of different CO(2) phases and degrees of CO(2) saturation on the interfacial tension and the diffusion of CO(2) into a hydrocarbon drop. Axisymmetric drop shape analysis on a pendant drop was used to carry out experiments in a pressure range of 10 to 160 bar and temperatures of 25 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C, thus covering the gaseous, liquid, and supercritical phases of CO(2). A numerical model that estimates the diffusion coefficient of CO(2) in the hydrocarbon was developed. The IFT between the carbonated water and the hydrocarbon increases with pressure in the gaseous phase of CO(2) and decreases in the liquid and supercritical CO(2) phases. Interestingly, when the pressure was increased above 120 bar, the IFT did not change (decrease); this indicates that above this pressure, complete miscibility may not be achieved for this system, as indicated by the stable IFT. From the results, it can be concluded that the maximum IFT, maximum density decrease, and minimum diffusion coefficient occurred at pressures near to and below the phase change pressure of CO(2) (64 bar at 25 °C and 74 bar at 35 °C and 45 °C). Both CO(2)–water–hydrocarbon and CW–hydrocarbon systems show the same trends; however, there were significant differences in the CO(2) mass transfer rate and the concentration gradient.