Cargando…
Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes
Prosthetic foot stiffness plays a key role in the functional mobility of lower limb prosthesis users. However, limited objective data exists to guide selection of the optimal prosthetic foot stiffness category for a given individual. Clinicians often must rely solely on manufacturer recommendations,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268136 |
_version_ | 1784704609838694400 |
---|---|
author | Turner, Anne T. Halsne, Elizabeth G. Caputo, Joshua M. Curran, Carl S. Hansen, Andrew H. Hafner, Brian J. Morgenroth, David C. |
author_facet | Turner, Anne T. Halsne, Elizabeth G. Caputo, Joshua M. Curran, Carl S. Hansen, Andrew H. Hafner, Brian J. Morgenroth, David C. |
author_sort | Turner, Anne T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prosthetic foot stiffness plays a key role in the functional mobility of lower limb prosthesis users. However, limited objective data exists to guide selection of the optimal prosthetic foot stiffness category for a given individual. Clinicians often must rely solely on manufacturer recommendations, which are typically based on the intended user’s weight and general activity level. Availability of comparable forefoot and heel stiffness data would allow for a better understanding of differences between different commercial prosthetic feet, and also between feet of different stiffness categories and foot sizes. Therefore, this study compared forefoot and heel linear stiffness properties across manufacturer-designated stiffness categories and foot sizes. Mechanical testing was completed for five types of commercial prosthetic feet across a range of stiffness categories and three foot-sizes. Data were collected for 56 prosthetic feet, in total. Testing at two discrete angles was conducted to isolate loading of the heel and forefoot components, respectively. Each prosthetic foot was loaded for six cycles while force and displacement data were collected. Forefoot and heel measured stiffness were both significantly associated with stiffness category (p = .001). There was no evidence that the relationships between stiffness category and measured stiffness differed by foot size (stiffness category by size interaction p = .80). However, there were inconsistencies between the expected and measured stiffness changes across stiffness categories (i.e., magnitude of stiffness changes varied substantially between consecutive stiffness categories of the same feet). While statistical results support that, on average, measured stiffness is positively correlated with stiffness category, force-displacement data suggest substantial variation in measured stiffness across consecutive categories. Published objective mechanical property data for commercial prosthetic feet would likely therefore be helpful to clinicians during prescription. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9089881 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90898812022-05-11 Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes Turner, Anne T. Halsne, Elizabeth G. Caputo, Joshua M. Curran, Carl S. Hansen, Andrew H. Hafner, Brian J. Morgenroth, David C. PLoS One Research Article Prosthetic foot stiffness plays a key role in the functional mobility of lower limb prosthesis users. However, limited objective data exists to guide selection of the optimal prosthetic foot stiffness category for a given individual. Clinicians often must rely solely on manufacturer recommendations, which are typically based on the intended user’s weight and general activity level. Availability of comparable forefoot and heel stiffness data would allow for a better understanding of differences between different commercial prosthetic feet, and also between feet of different stiffness categories and foot sizes. Therefore, this study compared forefoot and heel linear stiffness properties across manufacturer-designated stiffness categories and foot sizes. Mechanical testing was completed for five types of commercial prosthetic feet across a range of stiffness categories and three foot-sizes. Data were collected for 56 prosthetic feet, in total. Testing at two discrete angles was conducted to isolate loading of the heel and forefoot components, respectively. Each prosthetic foot was loaded for six cycles while force and displacement data were collected. Forefoot and heel measured stiffness were both significantly associated with stiffness category (p = .001). There was no evidence that the relationships between stiffness category and measured stiffness differed by foot size (stiffness category by size interaction p = .80). However, there were inconsistencies between the expected and measured stiffness changes across stiffness categories (i.e., magnitude of stiffness changes varied substantially between consecutive stiffness categories of the same feet). While statistical results support that, on average, measured stiffness is positively correlated with stiffness category, force-displacement data suggest substantial variation in measured stiffness across consecutive categories. Published objective mechanical property data for commercial prosthetic feet would likely therefore be helpful to clinicians during prescription. Public Library of Science 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9089881/ /pubmed/35536854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268136 Text en © 2022 Turner et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Turner, Anne T. Halsne, Elizabeth G. Caputo, Joshua M. Curran, Carl S. Hansen, Andrew H. Hafner, Brian J. Morgenroth, David C. Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes |
title | Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes |
title_full | Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes |
title_fullStr | Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes |
title_full_unstemmed | Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes |
title_short | Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes |
title_sort | prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turnerannet prostheticforefootandheelstiffnessacrossconsecutivefootstiffnesscategoriesandsizes AT halsneelizabethg prostheticforefootandheelstiffnessacrossconsecutivefootstiffnesscategoriesandsizes AT caputojoshuam prostheticforefootandheelstiffnessacrossconsecutivefootstiffnesscategoriesandsizes AT currancarls prostheticforefootandheelstiffnessacrossconsecutivefootstiffnesscategoriesandsizes AT hansenandrewh prostheticforefootandheelstiffnessacrossconsecutivefootstiffnesscategoriesandsizes AT hafnerbrianj prostheticforefootandheelstiffnessacrossconsecutivefootstiffnesscategoriesandsizes AT morgenrothdavidc prostheticforefootandheelstiffnessacrossconsecutivefootstiffnesscategoriesandsizes |