Cargando…

Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes

Prosthetic foot stiffness plays a key role in the functional mobility of lower limb prosthesis users. However, limited objective data exists to guide selection of the optimal prosthetic foot stiffness category for a given individual. Clinicians often must rely solely on manufacturer recommendations,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turner, Anne T., Halsne, Elizabeth G., Caputo, Joshua M., Curran, Carl S., Hansen, Andrew H., Hafner, Brian J., Morgenroth, David C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268136
_version_ 1784704609838694400
author Turner, Anne T.
Halsne, Elizabeth G.
Caputo, Joshua M.
Curran, Carl S.
Hansen, Andrew H.
Hafner, Brian J.
Morgenroth, David C.
author_facet Turner, Anne T.
Halsne, Elizabeth G.
Caputo, Joshua M.
Curran, Carl S.
Hansen, Andrew H.
Hafner, Brian J.
Morgenroth, David C.
author_sort Turner, Anne T.
collection PubMed
description Prosthetic foot stiffness plays a key role in the functional mobility of lower limb prosthesis users. However, limited objective data exists to guide selection of the optimal prosthetic foot stiffness category for a given individual. Clinicians often must rely solely on manufacturer recommendations, which are typically based on the intended user’s weight and general activity level. Availability of comparable forefoot and heel stiffness data would allow for a better understanding of differences between different commercial prosthetic feet, and also between feet of different stiffness categories and foot sizes. Therefore, this study compared forefoot and heel linear stiffness properties across manufacturer-designated stiffness categories and foot sizes. Mechanical testing was completed for five types of commercial prosthetic feet across a range of stiffness categories and three foot-sizes. Data were collected for 56 prosthetic feet, in total. Testing at two discrete angles was conducted to isolate loading of the heel and forefoot components, respectively. Each prosthetic foot was loaded for six cycles while force and displacement data were collected. Forefoot and heel measured stiffness were both significantly associated with stiffness category (p = .001). There was no evidence that the relationships between stiffness category and measured stiffness differed by foot size (stiffness category by size interaction p = .80). However, there were inconsistencies between the expected and measured stiffness changes across stiffness categories (i.e., magnitude of stiffness changes varied substantially between consecutive stiffness categories of the same feet). While statistical results support that, on average, measured stiffness is positively correlated with stiffness category, force-displacement data suggest substantial variation in measured stiffness across consecutive categories. Published objective mechanical property data for commercial prosthetic feet would likely therefore be helpful to clinicians during prescription.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9089881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90898812022-05-11 Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes Turner, Anne T. Halsne, Elizabeth G. Caputo, Joshua M. Curran, Carl S. Hansen, Andrew H. Hafner, Brian J. Morgenroth, David C. PLoS One Research Article Prosthetic foot stiffness plays a key role in the functional mobility of lower limb prosthesis users. However, limited objective data exists to guide selection of the optimal prosthetic foot stiffness category for a given individual. Clinicians often must rely solely on manufacturer recommendations, which are typically based on the intended user’s weight and general activity level. Availability of comparable forefoot and heel stiffness data would allow for a better understanding of differences between different commercial prosthetic feet, and also between feet of different stiffness categories and foot sizes. Therefore, this study compared forefoot and heel linear stiffness properties across manufacturer-designated stiffness categories and foot sizes. Mechanical testing was completed for five types of commercial prosthetic feet across a range of stiffness categories and three foot-sizes. Data were collected for 56 prosthetic feet, in total. Testing at two discrete angles was conducted to isolate loading of the heel and forefoot components, respectively. Each prosthetic foot was loaded for six cycles while force and displacement data were collected. Forefoot and heel measured stiffness were both significantly associated with stiffness category (p = .001). There was no evidence that the relationships between stiffness category and measured stiffness differed by foot size (stiffness category by size interaction p = .80). However, there were inconsistencies between the expected and measured stiffness changes across stiffness categories (i.e., magnitude of stiffness changes varied substantially between consecutive stiffness categories of the same feet). While statistical results support that, on average, measured stiffness is positively correlated with stiffness category, force-displacement data suggest substantial variation in measured stiffness across consecutive categories. Published objective mechanical property data for commercial prosthetic feet would likely therefore be helpful to clinicians during prescription. Public Library of Science 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9089881/ /pubmed/35536854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268136 Text en © 2022 Turner et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Turner, Anne T.
Halsne, Elizabeth G.
Caputo, Joshua M.
Curran, Carl S.
Hansen, Andrew H.
Hafner, Brian J.
Morgenroth, David C.
Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes
title Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes
title_full Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes
title_fullStr Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes
title_full_unstemmed Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes
title_short Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes
title_sort prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268136
work_keys_str_mv AT turnerannet prostheticforefootandheelstiffnessacrossconsecutivefootstiffnesscategoriesandsizes
AT halsneelizabethg prostheticforefootandheelstiffnessacrossconsecutivefootstiffnesscategoriesandsizes
AT caputojoshuam prostheticforefootandheelstiffnessacrossconsecutivefootstiffnesscategoriesandsizes
AT currancarls prostheticforefootandheelstiffnessacrossconsecutivefootstiffnesscategoriesandsizes
AT hansenandrewh prostheticforefootandheelstiffnessacrossconsecutivefootstiffnesscategoriesandsizes
AT hafnerbrianj prostheticforefootandheelstiffnessacrossconsecutivefootstiffnesscategoriesandsizes
AT morgenrothdavidc prostheticforefootandheelstiffnessacrossconsecutivefootstiffnesscategoriesandsizes