Cargando…

Is early childhood development impeded by the birth timing of the younger sibling?

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether the timing of birth of the younger siblings was associated with the risk of the older siblings’ developmental vulnerability in early childhood. METHODS: Linkage of population-level birth registration, hospital, and perinatal datasets to Australian Early De...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhamrait, Gursimran, O’Donnell, Melissa, Christian, Hayley, Pereira, Gavin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268325
_version_ 1784704612962402304
author Dhamrait, Gursimran
O’Donnell, Melissa
Christian, Hayley
Pereira, Gavin
author_facet Dhamrait, Gursimran
O’Donnell, Melissa
Christian, Hayley
Pereira, Gavin
author_sort Dhamrait, Gursimran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether the timing of birth of the younger siblings was associated with the risk of the older siblings’ developmental vulnerability in early childhood. METHODS: Linkage of population-level birth registration, hospital, and perinatal datasets to Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) records (2009–2015), enabled follow-up of a cohort of 32,324 Western Australia born singletons. Children with scores <10(th) percentile on an individual AEDC domain (Physical Health and Wellbeing; Social Competence; Emotional Maturity; Language and Cognitive Skills (school-based); and Communication Skills and General Knowledge) were classified as developmentally vulnerable. Modified Poisson Regression was used to estimate relative risks (RR) for associations between post-birth interpregnancy intervals (IPIs) and developmental vulnerability. RESULTS: Relative to post-birth IPIs of 18–23 months, post-birth IPIs of <6 and 6–11 months were associated with an increased risk of children being classified as DV1 (aRR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.11–1.31) and DV2 (aRR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.15–1.49); and DV1 (aRR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03–1.17) and DV2 (aRR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.09–1.34), respectively. Post-birth IPIs of <6 months were associated with an increased risk on four of the five AEDC domains. Post-birth IPIs of 48–60 months were associated with an increased risk of developmental vulnerability; however, the risk was statistically significant for DV1, DV2 and the domains of Emotional Maturity and Language and Cognitive Skills (school-based). CONCLUSIONS: Developmental vulnerability was associated with having a closely spaced younger sibling (<12 months post-birth IPIs). Optimising birth spacing should be further investigated as a potential means for improving child development outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9089893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90898932022-05-11 Is early childhood development impeded by the birth timing of the younger sibling? Dhamrait, Gursimran O’Donnell, Melissa Christian, Hayley Pereira, Gavin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether the timing of birth of the younger siblings was associated with the risk of the older siblings’ developmental vulnerability in early childhood. METHODS: Linkage of population-level birth registration, hospital, and perinatal datasets to Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) records (2009–2015), enabled follow-up of a cohort of 32,324 Western Australia born singletons. Children with scores <10(th) percentile on an individual AEDC domain (Physical Health and Wellbeing; Social Competence; Emotional Maturity; Language and Cognitive Skills (school-based); and Communication Skills and General Knowledge) were classified as developmentally vulnerable. Modified Poisson Regression was used to estimate relative risks (RR) for associations between post-birth interpregnancy intervals (IPIs) and developmental vulnerability. RESULTS: Relative to post-birth IPIs of 18–23 months, post-birth IPIs of <6 and 6–11 months were associated with an increased risk of children being classified as DV1 (aRR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.11–1.31) and DV2 (aRR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.15–1.49); and DV1 (aRR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03–1.17) and DV2 (aRR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.09–1.34), respectively. Post-birth IPIs of <6 months were associated with an increased risk on four of the five AEDC domains. Post-birth IPIs of 48–60 months were associated with an increased risk of developmental vulnerability; however, the risk was statistically significant for DV1, DV2 and the domains of Emotional Maturity and Language and Cognitive Skills (school-based). CONCLUSIONS: Developmental vulnerability was associated with having a closely spaced younger sibling (<12 months post-birth IPIs). Optimising birth spacing should be further investigated as a potential means for improving child development outcomes. Public Library of Science 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9089893/ /pubmed/35536788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268325 Text en © 2022 Dhamrait et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dhamrait, Gursimran
O’Donnell, Melissa
Christian, Hayley
Pereira, Gavin
Is early childhood development impeded by the birth timing of the younger sibling?
title Is early childhood development impeded by the birth timing of the younger sibling?
title_full Is early childhood development impeded by the birth timing of the younger sibling?
title_fullStr Is early childhood development impeded by the birth timing of the younger sibling?
title_full_unstemmed Is early childhood development impeded by the birth timing of the younger sibling?
title_short Is early childhood development impeded by the birth timing of the younger sibling?
title_sort is early childhood development impeded by the birth timing of the younger sibling?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9089893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268325
work_keys_str_mv AT dhamraitgursimran isearlychildhooddevelopmentimpededbythebirthtimingoftheyoungersibling
AT odonnellmelissa isearlychildhooddevelopmentimpededbythebirthtimingoftheyoungersibling
AT christianhayley isearlychildhooddevelopmentimpededbythebirthtimingoftheyoungersibling
AT pereiragavin isearlychildhooddevelopmentimpededbythebirthtimingoftheyoungersibling