Cargando…

One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task

Humans have the amazing ability to learn new visual concepts from just a single exemplar. How we achieve this remains mysterious. State-of-the-art theories suggest observers rely on internal ‘generative models’, which not only describe observed objects, but can also synthesize novel variations. Howe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tiedemann, Henning, Morgenstern, Yaniv, Schmidt, Filipp, Fleming, Roland W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536739
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75485
_version_ 1784704699246575616
author Tiedemann, Henning
Morgenstern, Yaniv
Schmidt, Filipp
Fleming, Roland W
author_facet Tiedemann, Henning
Morgenstern, Yaniv
Schmidt, Filipp
Fleming, Roland W
author_sort Tiedemann, Henning
collection PubMed
description Humans have the amazing ability to learn new visual concepts from just a single exemplar. How we achieve this remains mysterious. State-of-the-art theories suggest observers rely on internal ‘generative models’, which not only describe observed objects, but can also synthesize novel variations. However, compelling evidence for generative models in human one-shot learning remains sparse. In most studies, participants merely compare candidate objects created by the experimenters, rather than generating their own ideas. Here, we overcame this key limitation by presenting participants with 2D ‘Exemplar’ shapes and asking them to draw their own ‘Variations’ belonging to the same class. The drawings reveal that participants inferred—and synthesized—genuine novel categories that were far more varied than mere copies. Yet, there was striking agreement between participants about which shape features were most distinctive, and these tended to be preserved in the drawn Variations. Indeed, swapping distinctive parts caused objects to swap apparent category. Our findings suggest that internal generative models are key to how humans generalize from single exemplars. When observers see a novel object for the first time, they identify its most distinctive features and infer a generative model of its shape, allowing them to mentally synthesize plausible variants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9090327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90903272022-05-11 One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task Tiedemann, Henning Morgenstern, Yaniv Schmidt, Filipp Fleming, Roland W eLife Neuroscience Humans have the amazing ability to learn new visual concepts from just a single exemplar. How we achieve this remains mysterious. State-of-the-art theories suggest observers rely on internal ‘generative models’, which not only describe observed objects, but can also synthesize novel variations. However, compelling evidence for generative models in human one-shot learning remains sparse. In most studies, participants merely compare candidate objects created by the experimenters, rather than generating their own ideas. Here, we overcame this key limitation by presenting participants with 2D ‘Exemplar’ shapes and asking them to draw their own ‘Variations’ belonging to the same class. The drawings reveal that participants inferred—and synthesized—genuine novel categories that were far more varied than mere copies. Yet, there was striking agreement between participants about which shape features were most distinctive, and these tended to be preserved in the drawn Variations. Indeed, swapping distinctive parts caused objects to swap apparent category. Our findings suggest that internal generative models are key to how humans generalize from single exemplars. When observers see a novel object for the first time, they identify its most distinctive features and infer a generative model of its shape, allowing them to mentally synthesize plausible variants. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9090327/ /pubmed/35536739 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75485 Text en © 2022, Tiedemann et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Tiedemann, Henning
Morgenstern, Yaniv
Schmidt, Filipp
Fleming, Roland W
One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task
title One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task
title_full One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task
title_fullStr One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task
title_full_unstemmed One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task
title_short One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task
title_sort one-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536739
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75485
work_keys_str_mv AT tiedemannhenning oneshotgeneralizationinhumansrevealedthroughadrawingtask
AT morgensternyaniv oneshotgeneralizationinhumansrevealedthroughadrawingtask
AT schmidtfilipp oneshotgeneralizationinhumansrevealedthroughadrawingtask
AT flemingrolandw oneshotgeneralizationinhumansrevealedthroughadrawingtask