Cargando…
One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task
Humans have the amazing ability to learn new visual concepts from just a single exemplar. How we achieve this remains mysterious. State-of-the-art theories suggest observers rely on internal ‘generative models’, which not only describe observed objects, but can also synthesize novel variations. Howe...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536739 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75485 |
_version_ | 1784704699246575616 |
---|---|
author | Tiedemann, Henning Morgenstern, Yaniv Schmidt, Filipp Fleming, Roland W |
author_facet | Tiedemann, Henning Morgenstern, Yaniv Schmidt, Filipp Fleming, Roland W |
author_sort | Tiedemann, Henning |
collection | PubMed |
description | Humans have the amazing ability to learn new visual concepts from just a single exemplar. How we achieve this remains mysterious. State-of-the-art theories suggest observers rely on internal ‘generative models’, which not only describe observed objects, but can also synthesize novel variations. However, compelling evidence for generative models in human one-shot learning remains sparse. In most studies, participants merely compare candidate objects created by the experimenters, rather than generating their own ideas. Here, we overcame this key limitation by presenting participants with 2D ‘Exemplar’ shapes and asking them to draw their own ‘Variations’ belonging to the same class. The drawings reveal that participants inferred—and synthesized—genuine novel categories that were far more varied than mere copies. Yet, there was striking agreement between participants about which shape features were most distinctive, and these tended to be preserved in the drawn Variations. Indeed, swapping distinctive parts caused objects to swap apparent category. Our findings suggest that internal generative models are key to how humans generalize from single exemplars. When observers see a novel object for the first time, they identify its most distinctive features and infer a generative model of its shape, allowing them to mentally synthesize plausible variants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9090327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90903272022-05-11 One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task Tiedemann, Henning Morgenstern, Yaniv Schmidt, Filipp Fleming, Roland W eLife Neuroscience Humans have the amazing ability to learn new visual concepts from just a single exemplar. How we achieve this remains mysterious. State-of-the-art theories suggest observers rely on internal ‘generative models’, which not only describe observed objects, but can also synthesize novel variations. However, compelling evidence for generative models in human one-shot learning remains sparse. In most studies, participants merely compare candidate objects created by the experimenters, rather than generating their own ideas. Here, we overcame this key limitation by presenting participants with 2D ‘Exemplar’ shapes and asking them to draw their own ‘Variations’ belonging to the same class. The drawings reveal that participants inferred—and synthesized—genuine novel categories that were far more varied than mere copies. Yet, there was striking agreement between participants about which shape features were most distinctive, and these tended to be preserved in the drawn Variations. Indeed, swapping distinctive parts caused objects to swap apparent category. Our findings suggest that internal generative models are key to how humans generalize from single exemplars. When observers see a novel object for the first time, they identify its most distinctive features and infer a generative model of its shape, allowing them to mentally synthesize plausible variants. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9090327/ /pubmed/35536739 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75485 Text en © 2022, Tiedemann et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Tiedemann, Henning Morgenstern, Yaniv Schmidt, Filipp Fleming, Roland W One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task |
title | One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task |
title_full | One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task |
title_fullStr | One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task |
title_full_unstemmed | One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task |
title_short | One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task |
title_sort | one-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536739 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75485 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tiedemannhenning oneshotgeneralizationinhumansrevealedthroughadrawingtask AT morgensternyaniv oneshotgeneralizationinhumansrevealedthroughadrawingtask AT schmidtfilipp oneshotgeneralizationinhumansrevealedthroughadrawingtask AT flemingrolandw oneshotgeneralizationinhumansrevealedthroughadrawingtask |