Cargando…
Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the effect of different interfacial surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) between a short fiber-reinforced flowable composite (SFRC) and a particulate-filled flowable composite (PFC). In addition, SBS between two successive layers of similar materi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35559270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2070489 |
_version_ | 1784704702138548224 |
---|---|
author | Lassila, L. Tuokko, J. Suni, A. Garoushi, S. Vallittu, P. K. |
author_facet | Lassila, L. Tuokko, J. Suni, A. Garoushi, S. Vallittu, P. K. |
author_sort | Lassila, L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the effect of different interfacial surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) between a short fiber-reinforced flowable composite (SFRC) and a particulate-filled flowable composite (PFC). In addition, SBS between two successive layers of similar materials was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred and forty-four specimens were prepared having either SFRC (everX Flow) as a substructure composite and PFC (G-aenial Flo X) as a surface composite or having one of the two materials as both substructure and surface layer. Eight groups of specimens were created (n = 18/per group) according to the interfacial surface protocol used. Group 1: no treatment; Group 2: ethanol one wipe; Group 3: ethanol three wipes; Group 4: phosphoric acid etching + bonding agent; Group 5: hydrofluoric acid etching + bonding agent; and Group 6: grinding + phosphoric acid etching. Group 7: only PFC layers and Group 8 (control) only SFRC layers without any surface treatment. After one-day storage (37 °C), SBS between surface and substructure composite layers was measured in a universal testing machine, and failure modes were visually analyzed. SEM was used to examine the bonding surface of the SFRC composite after surface treatment. SBS values were statistically analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey HSD test (α = .05). RESULTS: The SBS between successive SFRC layers (Group 8) was statistically (p < .05) the highest (43.7 MPa) among tested groups. Surface roughening by grinding followed by phosphoric acid etching (Group 6) resulted in a higher SBS (28.8 MPa) than the remaining surface treatments. CONCLUSION: Flowable composite with glass fibers (everX Flow) showed higher interlayer SBS compared to PFC flowable composite. Interfacial surface roughness increases the bonding of PFC to the substructure of SFRC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9090340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90903402022-05-11 Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite Lassila, L. Tuokko, J. Suni, A. Garoushi, S. Vallittu, P. K. Biomater Investig Dent Short Communication OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the effect of different interfacial surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) between a short fiber-reinforced flowable composite (SFRC) and a particulate-filled flowable composite (PFC). In addition, SBS between two successive layers of similar materials was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred and forty-four specimens were prepared having either SFRC (everX Flow) as a substructure composite and PFC (G-aenial Flo X) as a surface composite or having one of the two materials as both substructure and surface layer. Eight groups of specimens were created (n = 18/per group) according to the interfacial surface protocol used. Group 1: no treatment; Group 2: ethanol one wipe; Group 3: ethanol three wipes; Group 4: phosphoric acid etching + bonding agent; Group 5: hydrofluoric acid etching + bonding agent; and Group 6: grinding + phosphoric acid etching. Group 7: only PFC layers and Group 8 (control) only SFRC layers without any surface treatment. After one-day storage (37 °C), SBS between surface and substructure composite layers was measured in a universal testing machine, and failure modes were visually analyzed. SEM was used to examine the bonding surface of the SFRC composite after surface treatment. SBS values were statistically analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey HSD test (α = .05). RESULTS: The SBS between successive SFRC layers (Group 8) was statistically (p < .05) the highest (43.7 MPa) among tested groups. Surface roughening by grinding followed by phosphoric acid etching (Group 6) resulted in a higher SBS (28.8 MPa) than the remaining surface treatments. CONCLUSION: Flowable composite with glass fibers (everX Flow) showed higher interlayer SBS compared to PFC flowable composite. Interfacial surface roughness increases the bonding of PFC to the substructure of SFRC. Taylor & Francis 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9090340/ /pubmed/35559270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2070489 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Lassila, L. Tuokko, J. Suni, A. Garoushi, S. Vallittu, P. K. Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite |
title | Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite |
title_full | Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite |
title_fullStr | Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite |
title_short | Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite |
title_sort | effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35559270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2070489 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lassilal effectofinterfacialsurfacetreatmentonbondstrengthofparticulatefilledcompositetoshortfiberreinforcedcomposite AT tuokkoj effectofinterfacialsurfacetreatmentonbondstrengthofparticulatefilledcompositetoshortfiberreinforcedcomposite AT sunia effectofinterfacialsurfacetreatmentonbondstrengthofparticulatefilledcompositetoshortfiberreinforcedcomposite AT garoushis effectofinterfacialsurfacetreatmentonbondstrengthofparticulatefilledcompositetoshortfiberreinforcedcomposite AT vallittupk effectofinterfacialsurfacetreatmentonbondstrengthofparticulatefilledcompositetoshortfiberreinforcedcomposite |