Cargando…

Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the effect of different interfacial surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) between a short fiber-reinforced flowable composite (SFRC) and a particulate-filled flowable composite (PFC). In addition, SBS between two successive layers of similar materi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lassila, L., Tuokko, J., Suni, A., Garoushi, S., Vallittu, P. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35559270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2070489
_version_ 1784704702138548224
author Lassila, L.
Tuokko, J.
Suni, A.
Garoushi, S.
Vallittu, P. K.
author_facet Lassila, L.
Tuokko, J.
Suni, A.
Garoushi, S.
Vallittu, P. K.
author_sort Lassila, L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the effect of different interfacial surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) between a short fiber-reinforced flowable composite (SFRC) and a particulate-filled flowable composite (PFC). In addition, SBS between two successive layers of similar materials was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred and forty-four specimens were prepared having either SFRC (everX Flow) as a substructure composite and PFC (G-aenial Flo X) as a surface composite or having one of the two materials as both substructure and surface layer. Eight groups of specimens were created (n = 18/per group) according to the interfacial surface protocol used. Group 1: no treatment; Group 2: ethanol one wipe; Group 3: ethanol three wipes; Group 4: phosphoric acid etching + bonding agent; Group 5: hydrofluoric acid etching + bonding agent; and Group 6: grinding + phosphoric acid etching. Group 7: only PFC layers and Group 8 (control) only SFRC layers without any surface treatment. After one-day storage (37 °C), SBS between surface and substructure composite layers was measured in a universal testing machine, and failure modes were visually analyzed. SEM was used to examine the bonding surface of the SFRC composite after surface treatment. SBS values were statistically analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey HSD test (α = .05). RESULTS: The SBS between successive SFRC layers (Group 8) was statistically (p < .05) the highest (43.7 MPa) among tested groups. Surface roughening by grinding followed by phosphoric acid etching (Group 6) resulted in a higher SBS (28.8 MPa) than the remaining surface treatments. CONCLUSION: Flowable composite with glass fibers (everX Flow) showed higher interlayer SBS compared to PFC flowable composite. Interfacial surface roughness increases the bonding of PFC to the substructure of SFRC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9090340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90903402022-05-11 Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite Lassila, L. Tuokko, J. Suni, A. Garoushi, S. Vallittu, P. K. Biomater Investig Dent Short Communication OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the effect of different interfacial surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) between a short fiber-reinforced flowable composite (SFRC) and a particulate-filled flowable composite (PFC). In addition, SBS between two successive layers of similar materials was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred and forty-four specimens were prepared having either SFRC (everX Flow) as a substructure composite and PFC (G-aenial Flo X) as a surface composite or having one of the two materials as both substructure and surface layer. Eight groups of specimens were created (n = 18/per group) according to the interfacial surface protocol used. Group 1: no treatment; Group 2: ethanol one wipe; Group 3: ethanol three wipes; Group 4: phosphoric acid etching + bonding agent; Group 5: hydrofluoric acid etching + bonding agent; and Group 6: grinding + phosphoric acid etching. Group 7: only PFC layers and Group 8 (control) only SFRC layers without any surface treatment. After one-day storage (37 °C), SBS between surface and substructure composite layers was measured in a universal testing machine, and failure modes were visually analyzed. SEM was used to examine the bonding surface of the SFRC composite after surface treatment. SBS values were statistically analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey HSD test (α = .05). RESULTS: The SBS between successive SFRC layers (Group 8) was statistically (p < .05) the highest (43.7 MPa) among tested groups. Surface roughening by grinding followed by phosphoric acid etching (Group 6) resulted in a higher SBS (28.8 MPa) than the remaining surface treatments. CONCLUSION: Flowable composite with glass fibers (everX Flow) showed higher interlayer SBS compared to PFC flowable composite. Interfacial surface roughness increases the bonding of PFC to the substructure of SFRC. Taylor & Francis 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9090340/ /pubmed/35559270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2070489 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Lassila, L.
Tuokko, J.
Suni, A.
Garoushi, S.
Vallittu, P. K.
Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite
title Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite
title_full Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite
title_fullStr Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite
title_full_unstemmed Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite
title_short Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite
title_sort effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35559270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2070489
work_keys_str_mv AT lassilal effectofinterfacialsurfacetreatmentonbondstrengthofparticulatefilledcompositetoshortfiberreinforcedcomposite
AT tuokkoj effectofinterfacialsurfacetreatmentonbondstrengthofparticulatefilledcompositetoshortfiberreinforcedcomposite
AT sunia effectofinterfacialsurfacetreatmentonbondstrengthofparticulatefilledcompositetoshortfiberreinforcedcomposite
AT garoushis effectofinterfacialsurfacetreatmentonbondstrengthofparticulatefilledcompositetoshortfiberreinforcedcomposite
AT vallittupk effectofinterfacialsurfacetreatmentonbondstrengthofparticulatefilledcompositetoshortfiberreinforcedcomposite