Cargando…
Use and quality of point-of-care microscopy, urine culture and susceptibility testing for urinalysis in general practice
Objective: To describe the use and quality of point-of-care (POC) microscopy, urine culture and susceptibility testing performed in general practice in Northern Denmark from 2013 to 2018. Design: Descriptive study Setting: General practices receiving a fee for examining urine samples. Subjects: Simu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35023809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2021.2022349 |
_version_ | 1784704702372380672 |
---|---|
author | Kollerup, Ida Aagaard Thomsen, Anne Kathrine Kornum, Jette Brommann Paulsen, Kirsten Inger Bjerrum, Lars Hansen, Malene Plejdrup |
author_facet | Kollerup, Ida Aagaard Thomsen, Anne Kathrine Kornum, Jette Brommann Paulsen, Kirsten Inger Bjerrum, Lars Hansen, Malene Plejdrup |
author_sort | Kollerup, Ida |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To describe the use and quality of point-of-care (POC) microscopy, urine culture and susceptibility testing performed in general practice in Northern Denmark from 2013 to 2018. Design: Descriptive study Setting: General practices receiving a fee for examining urine samples. Subjects: Simulated urine samples containing uropathogenic bacteria distributed by the organisation for improvement of microbiological quality (MIKAP). Main outcome measures: Percentage of use and correct answers for microscopy, culture and susceptibility testing. Results: A total of 5361 samples were analysed by the use of microscopy (39.7%), culture (66.0%) and/or susceptibility testing (76.5%). For culture, Flexicult SSI urinary kit(tm) (87.6%) demonstrated the highest percentage of correct answers followed by chromogenic agar (85.1%) and 2-plate dipslide (85.2%). Mueller Hinton agar with tablets had the highest percentage of correct answers for susceptibility testing of most bacterial strains (84.6%), followed by Flexicult (77.2%). Furthermore, susceptibility testing with tablets (range: 76.1–84.6%) was found to be more accurate than discs (range: 72.9–75.5%). Overall, the highest percentage of correct answers was obtained when examining urine samples containing Escherichia coli: Microscopy (78.3%), culture (87.0%) and susceptibility testing (range: 84.3–90.7%). Conclusion: The quality of POC testing in general practice was high when examining urine samples containing the most common uropathogen E. coli. KEY POINTS: The quality of POC tests (microscopy, urine culture, susceptibility testing) performed in general practice was high when examining urine containing E. coli, whereas difficulties were observed for samples including S. saprophyticus or K. pneumoniae. Susceptibility testing was more often performed than urine culture, which indicates a problem as only urine cultures contribute with information about the flora composition and bacterial quantification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9090341 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90903412022-05-11 Use and quality of point-of-care microscopy, urine culture and susceptibility testing for urinalysis in general practice Kollerup, Ida Aagaard Thomsen, Anne Kathrine Kornum, Jette Brommann Paulsen, Kirsten Inger Bjerrum, Lars Hansen, Malene Plejdrup Scand J Prim Health Care Original Articles Objective: To describe the use and quality of point-of-care (POC) microscopy, urine culture and susceptibility testing performed in general practice in Northern Denmark from 2013 to 2018. Design: Descriptive study Setting: General practices receiving a fee for examining urine samples. Subjects: Simulated urine samples containing uropathogenic bacteria distributed by the organisation for improvement of microbiological quality (MIKAP). Main outcome measures: Percentage of use and correct answers for microscopy, culture and susceptibility testing. Results: A total of 5361 samples were analysed by the use of microscopy (39.7%), culture (66.0%) and/or susceptibility testing (76.5%). For culture, Flexicult SSI urinary kit(tm) (87.6%) demonstrated the highest percentage of correct answers followed by chromogenic agar (85.1%) and 2-plate dipslide (85.2%). Mueller Hinton agar with tablets had the highest percentage of correct answers for susceptibility testing of most bacterial strains (84.6%), followed by Flexicult (77.2%). Furthermore, susceptibility testing with tablets (range: 76.1–84.6%) was found to be more accurate than discs (range: 72.9–75.5%). Overall, the highest percentage of correct answers was obtained when examining urine samples containing Escherichia coli: Microscopy (78.3%), culture (87.0%) and susceptibility testing (range: 84.3–90.7%). Conclusion: The quality of POC testing in general practice was high when examining urine samples containing the most common uropathogen E. coli. KEY POINTS: The quality of POC tests (microscopy, urine culture, susceptibility testing) performed in general practice was high when examining urine containing E. coli, whereas difficulties were observed for samples including S. saprophyticus or K. pneumoniae. Susceptibility testing was more often performed than urine culture, which indicates a problem as only urine cultures contribute with information about the flora composition and bacterial quantification. Taylor & Francis 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9090341/ /pubmed/35023809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2021.2022349 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kollerup, Ida Aagaard Thomsen, Anne Kathrine Kornum, Jette Brommann Paulsen, Kirsten Inger Bjerrum, Lars Hansen, Malene Plejdrup Use and quality of point-of-care microscopy, urine culture and susceptibility testing for urinalysis in general practice |
title | Use and quality of point-of-care microscopy, urine culture and susceptibility testing for urinalysis in general practice |
title_full | Use and quality of point-of-care microscopy, urine culture and susceptibility testing for urinalysis in general practice |
title_fullStr | Use and quality of point-of-care microscopy, urine culture and susceptibility testing for urinalysis in general practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Use and quality of point-of-care microscopy, urine culture and susceptibility testing for urinalysis in general practice |
title_short | Use and quality of point-of-care microscopy, urine culture and susceptibility testing for urinalysis in general practice |
title_sort | use and quality of point-of-care microscopy, urine culture and susceptibility testing for urinalysis in general practice |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35023809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2021.2022349 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kollerupida useandqualityofpointofcaremicroscopyurinecultureandsusceptibilitytestingforurinalysisingeneralpractice AT aagaardthomsenannekathrine useandqualityofpointofcaremicroscopyurinecultureandsusceptibilitytestingforurinalysisingeneralpractice AT kornumjettebrommann useandqualityofpointofcaremicroscopyurinecultureandsusceptibilitytestingforurinalysisingeneralpractice AT paulsenkirsteninger useandqualityofpointofcaremicroscopyurinecultureandsusceptibilitytestingforurinalysisingeneralpractice AT bjerrumlars useandqualityofpointofcaremicroscopyurinecultureandsusceptibilitytestingforurinalysisingeneralpractice AT hansenmaleneplejdrup useandqualityofpointofcaremicroscopyurinecultureandsusceptibilitytestingforurinalysisingeneralpractice |