Cargando…

Clinical Analysis of Approach Selection of Extraction of Maxillary Embedded Mesiodens in Children

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between the position of embedded mesiodens in maxilla and surgical approach in children and thus provide reference materials for surgical design. METHODS: According to the preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination, the location and surgical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kong, Jie, Peng, Zhaowei, Zhong, Tianhang, Shu, Huang, Wang, Ji, Kuang, Yiyuan, Ding, Guicong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35557873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6517024
_version_ 1784704744274526208
author Kong, Jie
Peng, Zhaowei
Zhong, Tianhang
Shu, Huang
Wang, Ji
Kuang, Yiyuan
Ding, Guicong
author_facet Kong, Jie
Peng, Zhaowei
Zhong, Tianhang
Shu, Huang
Wang, Ji
Kuang, Yiyuan
Ding, Guicong
author_sort Kong, Jie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between the position of embedded mesiodens in maxilla and surgical approach in children and thus provide reference materials for surgical design. METHODS: According to the preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination, the location and surgical approach characteristics of 625 children aged 4-16 years old who presented with embedded mesiodens in maxilla and were diagnosed in our department from January 2016 to December 2021 were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: There were 877 embedded mesiodens in 625 children. The selected cases were classified according to the axial angle relationship between mesiodens and adjacent normal teeth or tooth germs, including 84 cases of acute angle type (including the same direction) (13.4%), 66 cases of vertical type (10.6%), 114 cases of obtuse angle type (18.2%), 271 cases of inverted type (43.4%), and 90 cases of mixed type (14.4%). The palatal gingival margin approach was the most selected surgical approach for the cases of acute angle (including synclastic), obtuse angle, and inverted type, and the palatal gingival margin approach and the combined labial-palatal approach were the most selected surgical approach for the cases of vertical and mixed type. CONCLUSION: Palatal gingival margin approach was the most common surgical approach for various types of embedded mesiodens in maxilla in children. Surgeons should classify the case of mesiodens according to the preoperative imaging examination and design the surgical approach reasonably.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9090532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90905322022-05-11 Clinical Analysis of Approach Selection of Extraction of Maxillary Embedded Mesiodens in Children Kong, Jie Peng, Zhaowei Zhong, Tianhang Shu, Huang Wang, Ji Kuang, Yiyuan Ding, Guicong Dis Markers Research Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between the position of embedded mesiodens in maxilla and surgical approach in children and thus provide reference materials for surgical design. METHODS: According to the preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination, the location and surgical approach characteristics of 625 children aged 4-16 years old who presented with embedded mesiodens in maxilla and were diagnosed in our department from January 2016 to December 2021 were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: There were 877 embedded mesiodens in 625 children. The selected cases were classified according to the axial angle relationship between mesiodens and adjacent normal teeth or tooth germs, including 84 cases of acute angle type (including the same direction) (13.4%), 66 cases of vertical type (10.6%), 114 cases of obtuse angle type (18.2%), 271 cases of inverted type (43.4%), and 90 cases of mixed type (14.4%). The palatal gingival margin approach was the most selected surgical approach for the cases of acute angle (including synclastic), obtuse angle, and inverted type, and the palatal gingival margin approach and the combined labial-palatal approach were the most selected surgical approach for the cases of vertical and mixed type. CONCLUSION: Palatal gingival margin approach was the most common surgical approach for various types of embedded mesiodens in maxilla in children. Surgeons should classify the case of mesiodens according to the preoperative imaging examination and design the surgical approach reasonably. Hindawi 2022-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9090532/ /pubmed/35557873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6517024 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jie Kong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kong, Jie
Peng, Zhaowei
Zhong, Tianhang
Shu, Huang
Wang, Ji
Kuang, Yiyuan
Ding, Guicong
Clinical Analysis of Approach Selection of Extraction of Maxillary Embedded Mesiodens in Children
title Clinical Analysis of Approach Selection of Extraction of Maxillary Embedded Mesiodens in Children
title_full Clinical Analysis of Approach Selection of Extraction of Maxillary Embedded Mesiodens in Children
title_fullStr Clinical Analysis of Approach Selection of Extraction of Maxillary Embedded Mesiodens in Children
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Analysis of Approach Selection of Extraction of Maxillary Embedded Mesiodens in Children
title_short Clinical Analysis of Approach Selection of Extraction of Maxillary Embedded Mesiodens in Children
title_sort clinical analysis of approach selection of extraction of maxillary embedded mesiodens in children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35557873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6517024
work_keys_str_mv AT kongjie clinicalanalysisofapproachselectionofextractionofmaxillaryembeddedmesiodensinchildren
AT pengzhaowei clinicalanalysisofapproachselectionofextractionofmaxillaryembeddedmesiodensinchildren
AT zhongtianhang clinicalanalysisofapproachselectionofextractionofmaxillaryembeddedmesiodensinchildren
AT shuhuang clinicalanalysisofapproachselectionofextractionofmaxillaryembeddedmesiodensinchildren
AT wangji clinicalanalysisofapproachselectionofextractionofmaxillaryembeddedmesiodensinchildren
AT kuangyiyuan clinicalanalysisofapproachselectionofextractionofmaxillaryembeddedmesiodensinchildren
AT dingguicong clinicalanalysisofapproachselectionofextractionofmaxillaryembeddedmesiodensinchildren