Cargando…
The biomechanical fundamentals of crosslink-augmentation in posterior spinal instrumentation
Posterior screw-rod constructs can be used to stabilize spinal segments; however, the stiffness is not absolute, and some motion can persist. While the effect of crosslink-augmentation has been evaluated in multiple studies, the fundamental explanation of their effectiveness has not been investigate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11719-2 |
_version_ | 1784704807738540032 |
---|---|
author | Cornaz, Frédéric Fasser, Marie-Rosa Snedeker, Jess Gerrit Spirig, José Miguel Farshad, Mazda Widmer, Jonas |
author_facet | Cornaz, Frédéric Fasser, Marie-Rosa Snedeker, Jess Gerrit Spirig, José Miguel Farshad, Mazda Widmer, Jonas |
author_sort | Cornaz, Frédéric |
collection | PubMed |
description | Posterior screw-rod constructs can be used to stabilize spinal segments; however, the stiffness is not absolute, and some motion can persist. While the effect of crosslink-augmentation has been evaluated in multiple studies, the fundamental explanation of their effectiveness has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to quantify the parameters “screw rotation” and “parallelogram deformation” in posterior instrumentations with and without crosslinks to analyze and explain their fundamental effect. Biomechanical testing of 15 posteriorly instrumented human spinal segments (Th10/11—L4/L5) was conducted in axial rotation, lateral bending, and flexion–extension with ± 7.5 Nm. Screw rotation and parallelogram deformation were compared for both configurations. Parallelogram deformation occurred predominantly during axial rotation (2.6°) and was reduced by 60% (−1.45°, p = 0.02) by the addition of a crosslink. Simultaneously, screw rotation (0.56°) was reduced by 48% (−0.27°, p = 0.02) in this loading condition. During lateral bending, 0.38° of parallelogram deformation and 1.44° of screw rotation was measured and no significant reduction was achieved by crosslink-augmentation (8%, −0.03°, −p = 0.3 and −13%, −0.19°, p = 0.7 respectively). During flexion–extension, parallelogram deformation was 0.4° and screw rotation was 0.39° and crosslink-augmentation had no significant effect on these values (−0.12°, −30%, p = 0.5 and −0°, −0%, p = 0.8 respectively). In axial rotation, crosslink-augmentation can reduce parallelogram deformation and with that, screw rotation. In lateral bending and flexion–extension parallelogram deformation is minimal and crosslink-augmentation has no significant effect. Since the relatively large screw rotation in lateral bending is not caused by parallelogram deformation, crosslink-augmentation is no adequate countermeasure. The fundamental understanding of the biomechanical effect of crosslink-augmentation helps better understand its potential and limitations in increasing construct stiffness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9090827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90908272022-05-12 The biomechanical fundamentals of crosslink-augmentation in posterior spinal instrumentation Cornaz, Frédéric Fasser, Marie-Rosa Snedeker, Jess Gerrit Spirig, José Miguel Farshad, Mazda Widmer, Jonas Sci Rep Article Posterior screw-rod constructs can be used to stabilize spinal segments; however, the stiffness is not absolute, and some motion can persist. While the effect of crosslink-augmentation has been evaluated in multiple studies, the fundamental explanation of their effectiveness has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to quantify the parameters “screw rotation” and “parallelogram deformation” in posterior instrumentations with and without crosslinks to analyze and explain their fundamental effect. Biomechanical testing of 15 posteriorly instrumented human spinal segments (Th10/11—L4/L5) was conducted in axial rotation, lateral bending, and flexion–extension with ± 7.5 Nm. Screw rotation and parallelogram deformation were compared for both configurations. Parallelogram deformation occurred predominantly during axial rotation (2.6°) and was reduced by 60% (−1.45°, p = 0.02) by the addition of a crosslink. Simultaneously, screw rotation (0.56°) was reduced by 48% (−0.27°, p = 0.02) in this loading condition. During lateral bending, 0.38° of parallelogram deformation and 1.44° of screw rotation was measured and no significant reduction was achieved by crosslink-augmentation (8%, −0.03°, −p = 0.3 and −13%, −0.19°, p = 0.7 respectively). During flexion–extension, parallelogram deformation was 0.4° and screw rotation was 0.39° and crosslink-augmentation had no significant effect on these values (−0.12°, −30%, p = 0.5 and −0°, −0%, p = 0.8 respectively). In axial rotation, crosslink-augmentation can reduce parallelogram deformation and with that, screw rotation. In lateral bending and flexion–extension parallelogram deformation is minimal and crosslink-augmentation has no significant effect. Since the relatively large screw rotation in lateral bending is not caused by parallelogram deformation, crosslink-augmentation is no adequate countermeasure. The fundamental understanding of the biomechanical effect of crosslink-augmentation helps better understand its potential and limitations in increasing construct stiffness. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9090827/ /pubmed/35538122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11719-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Cornaz, Frédéric Fasser, Marie-Rosa Snedeker, Jess Gerrit Spirig, José Miguel Farshad, Mazda Widmer, Jonas The biomechanical fundamentals of crosslink-augmentation in posterior spinal instrumentation |
title | The biomechanical fundamentals of crosslink-augmentation in posterior spinal instrumentation |
title_full | The biomechanical fundamentals of crosslink-augmentation in posterior spinal instrumentation |
title_fullStr | The biomechanical fundamentals of crosslink-augmentation in posterior spinal instrumentation |
title_full_unstemmed | The biomechanical fundamentals of crosslink-augmentation in posterior spinal instrumentation |
title_short | The biomechanical fundamentals of crosslink-augmentation in posterior spinal instrumentation |
title_sort | biomechanical fundamentals of crosslink-augmentation in posterior spinal instrumentation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11719-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cornazfrederic thebiomechanicalfundamentalsofcrosslinkaugmentationinposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT fassermarierosa thebiomechanicalfundamentalsofcrosslinkaugmentationinposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT snedekerjessgerrit thebiomechanicalfundamentalsofcrosslinkaugmentationinposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT spirigjosemiguel thebiomechanicalfundamentalsofcrosslinkaugmentationinposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT farshadmazda thebiomechanicalfundamentalsofcrosslinkaugmentationinposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT widmerjonas thebiomechanicalfundamentalsofcrosslinkaugmentationinposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT cornazfrederic biomechanicalfundamentalsofcrosslinkaugmentationinposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT fassermarierosa biomechanicalfundamentalsofcrosslinkaugmentationinposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT snedekerjessgerrit biomechanicalfundamentalsofcrosslinkaugmentationinposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT spirigjosemiguel biomechanicalfundamentalsofcrosslinkaugmentationinposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT farshadmazda biomechanicalfundamentalsofcrosslinkaugmentationinposteriorspinalinstrumentation AT widmerjonas biomechanicalfundamentalsofcrosslinkaugmentationinposteriorspinalinstrumentation |