Cargando…

YouTube and the Achilles Tendon: An Analysis of Internet Information Reliability and Content Quality

Purpose: To evaluate the educational content, quality, and reliability of YouTube videos regarding the Achilles tendon and Achilles tendon injuries. Methods: The first 50 videos found on YouTube after searching “Achilles tendon” were evaluated and classified by content type and uploader source. Reli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMahon, Kevin M, Schwartz, Justin, Nilles-Melchert, Thomas, Ray, Kelley, Eaton, Vincent, Chakkalakal, Dennis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9091342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573564
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23984
_version_ 1784704899199533056
author McMahon, Kevin M
Schwartz, Justin
Nilles-Melchert, Thomas
Ray, Kelley
Eaton, Vincent
Chakkalakal, Dennis
author_facet McMahon, Kevin M
Schwartz, Justin
Nilles-Melchert, Thomas
Ray, Kelley
Eaton, Vincent
Chakkalakal, Dennis
author_sort McMahon, Kevin M
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To evaluate the educational content, quality, and reliability of YouTube videos regarding the Achilles tendon and Achilles tendon injuries. Methods: The first 50 videos found on YouTube after searching “Achilles tendon” were evaluated and classified by content type and uploader source. Reliability and accuracy were assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, nonspecific educational content was assessed via the Global Quality Score (GQS), and specific educational content was assessed using the Achilles Tendon Specific Score (ATSS). ANOVA was performed to determine differences in video reliability and educational content quality by video content type and source. Multivariate stepwise regressions were used to evaluate the effects of specific video characteristics on JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and ATSS. Results: The 50 videos evaluated had a cumulative view total of 53,323,307, a mean of 1,066,466, and a range of 1,009 to 42,663,665 views per video. Most videos focused on disease-specific information (38%) and exercise training (22%). Most videos were uploaded by non-physicians (34%) or medical sources (health websites) (32%). A higher view ratio was an independent predictor of lower JAMA scores (lower reliability and accuracy) (standardized beta = −0.281, P = 0.048) and increased video duration was an independent predictor of greater GQS (standardized beta = 0.380, P = 0.007) and ATSS scores (standardized beta = 0.364, P = 0.009) (increased quality of nonspecific and specific educational content). Conclusion: Videos on YouTube regarding the Achilles tendon were viewed numerous times, but their educational content and reliability were poor. Providers treating patients for Achilles tendon-related pathologies should initiate a dialogue with patients about their use of internet sources and should educate them on their optimal usage. They should warn them of the low quality of YouTube-derived information and provide them with reliable sources that may better give them control over their own care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9091342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90913422022-05-14 YouTube and the Achilles Tendon: An Analysis of Internet Information Reliability and Content Quality McMahon, Kevin M Schwartz, Justin Nilles-Melchert, Thomas Ray, Kelley Eaton, Vincent Chakkalakal, Dennis Cureus Family/General Practice Purpose: To evaluate the educational content, quality, and reliability of YouTube videos regarding the Achilles tendon and Achilles tendon injuries. Methods: The first 50 videos found on YouTube after searching “Achilles tendon” were evaluated and classified by content type and uploader source. Reliability and accuracy were assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, nonspecific educational content was assessed via the Global Quality Score (GQS), and specific educational content was assessed using the Achilles Tendon Specific Score (ATSS). ANOVA was performed to determine differences in video reliability and educational content quality by video content type and source. Multivariate stepwise regressions were used to evaluate the effects of specific video characteristics on JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and ATSS. Results: The 50 videos evaluated had a cumulative view total of 53,323,307, a mean of 1,066,466, and a range of 1,009 to 42,663,665 views per video. Most videos focused on disease-specific information (38%) and exercise training (22%). Most videos were uploaded by non-physicians (34%) or medical sources (health websites) (32%). A higher view ratio was an independent predictor of lower JAMA scores (lower reliability and accuracy) (standardized beta = −0.281, P = 0.048) and increased video duration was an independent predictor of greater GQS (standardized beta = 0.380, P = 0.007) and ATSS scores (standardized beta = 0.364, P = 0.009) (increased quality of nonspecific and specific educational content). Conclusion: Videos on YouTube regarding the Achilles tendon were viewed numerous times, but their educational content and reliability were poor. Providers treating patients for Achilles tendon-related pathologies should initiate a dialogue with patients about their use of internet sources and should educate them on their optimal usage. They should warn them of the low quality of YouTube-derived information and provide them with reliable sources that may better give them control over their own care. Cureus 2022-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9091342/ /pubmed/35573564 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23984 Text en Copyright © 2022, McMahon et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Family/General Practice
McMahon, Kevin M
Schwartz, Justin
Nilles-Melchert, Thomas
Ray, Kelley
Eaton, Vincent
Chakkalakal, Dennis
YouTube and the Achilles Tendon: An Analysis of Internet Information Reliability and Content Quality
title YouTube and the Achilles Tendon: An Analysis of Internet Information Reliability and Content Quality
title_full YouTube and the Achilles Tendon: An Analysis of Internet Information Reliability and Content Quality
title_fullStr YouTube and the Achilles Tendon: An Analysis of Internet Information Reliability and Content Quality
title_full_unstemmed YouTube and the Achilles Tendon: An Analysis of Internet Information Reliability and Content Quality
title_short YouTube and the Achilles Tendon: An Analysis of Internet Information Reliability and Content Quality
title_sort youtube and the achilles tendon: an analysis of internet information reliability and content quality
topic Family/General Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9091342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573564
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23984
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmahonkevinm youtubeandtheachillestendonananalysisofinternetinformationreliabilityandcontentquality
AT schwartzjustin youtubeandtheachillestendonananalysisofinternetinformationreliabilityandcontentquality
AT nillesmelchertthomas youtubeandtheachillestendonananalysisofinternetinformationreliabilityandcontentquality
AT raykelley youtubeandtheachillestendonananalysisofinternetinformationreliabilityandcontentquality
AT eatonvincent youtubeandtheachillestendonananalysisofinternetinformationreliabilityandcontentquality
AT chakkalakaldennis youtubeandtheachillestendonananalysisofinternetinformationreliabilityandcontentquality