Cargando…

Battery Ingestion in Children, an Ongoing Challenge: Recent Experience of a Tertiary Center

INTRODUCTION: Morbidity related to childhood battery ingestions (BI) has increased recently due to the expanding use of larger lithium cells. A prompt endoscopic removal is vital to prevent severe complications in cases of esophageal batteries (EB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, descriptiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorenzo, Cristina, Azevedo, Sara, Lopes, João, Fernandes, Ana, Loreto, Helena, Mourato, Paula, Lopes, Ana Isabel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9091558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.848092
_version_ 1784704949035204608
author Lorenzo, Cristina
Azevedo, Sara
Lopes, João
Fernandes, Ana
Loreto, Helena
Mourato, Paula
Lopes, Ana Isabel
author_facet Lorenzo, Cristina
Azevedo, Sara
Lopes, João
Fernandes, Ana
Loreto, Helena
Mourato, Paula
Lopes, Ana Isabel
author_sort Lorenzo, Cristina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Morbidity related to childhood battery ingestions (BI) has increased recently due to the expanding use of larger lithium cells. A prompt endoscopic removal is vital to prevent severe complications in cases of esophageal batteries (EB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study of admissions for BI requiring endoscopic removal in a tertiary hospital's pediatric emergency department (Jan. 2011/Dec. 2020). RESULTS: We had 35 cases, with an increasing incidence in the last 6 years; median age, 26 m (8 m-10 years), witnessed ingestion in 86%. On the X-ray: 14 (40%) had an EB, 21 (60%), a gastric battery (GB). Symptoms were present in 57% (100% EB/24% GB), and vomiting was the most frequent (50%). Endoscopy revealed: EB, 13 (37%); GB, 17 (49%); duodenal battery, 1 (3%); no battery, 4 (11%). Median time to removal: EB, 7 h (2 h-21days); GB, 12 h (2 h-3 days). All the patients with EB on the X-ray (14) had severe mucosal injury (Zargar classification): Grade IIIa, 7 (50%); IIIb, 5 (36%); IV, 2 (14%). CT-scan showed perforation in 2 patients (total, 4; 29% of EB). In patients with GB (21), 14 (67%) had mucosal damage; 13 (93%), mild (< Grade III, two esophageal erosions); 1 (7%) IIIa (esophageal ulceration). A statistically significant association between exposure time, younger age or battery size and severity of endoscopic lesions was found in EB location. There were no mortality cases. Acute complications occurred in 57% of EB: infection, 50%; perforation, 29%; pneumomediastinum/stridor, 14%; pneumothorax/subglottic stenosis/hemodynamic instability, 7 vs. 0% GB. Stenosis subsequently developed in 6 (43%) of EB: mild, 4 cases (29%); severe, 2 cases (14%, one resolved after endoscopic dilation; one needed a gastrostomy and esophagocoloplasty). CONCLUSION: We verified recent increase in admissions due to battery ingestions and associated complications, despite the availability of an emergency pediatric endoscopy team. The patients with EB had more severe mucosal injury and poorer short/long-term outcomes. Children with GB had milder lesions, although the presence of a GB did not exclude esophageal injury. The availability of actual data from national referral centers will support advocacy efforts among stakeholders, including industry representatives and policy makers, in preventing worldwide button battery injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9091558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90915582022-05-12 Battery Ingestion in Children, an Ongoing Challenge: Recent Experience of a Tertiary Center Lorenzo, Cristina Azevedo, Sara Lopes, João Fernandes, Ana Loreto, Helena Mourato, Paula Lopes, Ana Isabel Front Pediatr Pediatrics INTRODUCTION: Morbidity related to childhood battery ingestions (BI) has increased recently due to the expanding use of larger lithium cells. A prompt endoscopic removal is vital to prevent severe complications in cases of esophageal batteries (EB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study of admissions for BI requiring endoscopic removal in a tertiary hospital's pediatric emergency department (Jan. 2011/Dec. 2020). RESULTS: We had 35 cases, with an increasing incidence in the last 6 years; median age, 26 m (8 m-10 years), witnessed ingestion in 86%. On the X-ray: 14 (40%) had an EB, 21 (60%), a gastric battery (GB). Symptoms were present in 57% (100% EB/24% GB), and vomiting was the most frequent (50%). Endoscopy revealed: EB, 13 (37%); GB, 17 (49%); duodenal battery, 1 (3%); no battery, 4 (11%). Median time to removal: EB, 7 h (2 h-21days); GB, 12 h (2 h-3 days). All the patients with EB on the X-ray (14) had severe mucosal injury (Zargar classification): Grade IIIa, 7 (50%); IIIb, 5 (36%); IV, 2 (14%). CT-scan showed perforation in 2 patients (total, 4; 29% of EB). In patients with GB (21), 14 (67%) had mucosal damage; 13 (93%), mild (< Grade III, two esophageal erosions); 1 (7%) IIIa (esophageal ulceration). A statistically significant association between exposure time, younger age or battery size and severity of endoscopic lesions was found in EB location. There were no mortality cases. Acute complications occurred in 57% of EB: infection, 50%; perforation, 29%; pneumomediastinum/stridor, 14%; pneumothorax/subglottic stenosis/hemodynamic instability, 7 vs. 0% GB. Stenosis subsequently developed in 6 (43%) of EB: mild, 4 cases (29%); severe, 2 cases (14%, one resolved after endoscopic dilation; one needed a gastrostomy and esophagocoloplasty). CONCLUSION: We verified recent increase in admissions due to battery ingestions and associated complications, despite the availability of an emergency pediatric endoscopy team. The patients with EB had more severe mucosal injury and poorer short/long-term outcomes. Children with GB had milder lesions, although the presence of a GB did not exclude esophageal injury. The availability of actual data from national referral centers will support advocacy efforts among stakeholders, including industry representatives and policy makers, in preventing worldwide button battery injury. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9091558/ /pubmed/35573958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.848092 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lorenzo, Azevedo, Lopes, Fernandes, Loreto, Mourato and Lopes. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Lorenzo, Cristina
Azevedo, Sara
Lopes, João
Fernandes, Ana
Loreto, Helena
Mourato, Paula
Lopes, Ana Isabel
Battery Ingestion in Children, an Ongoing Challenge: Recent Experience of a Tertiary Center
title Battery Ingestion in Children, an Ongoing Challenge: Recent Experience of a Tertiary Center
title_full Battery Ingestion in Children, an Ongoing Challenge: Recent Experience of a Tertiary Center
title_fullStr Battery Ingestion in Children, an Ongoing Challenge: Recent Experience of a Tertiary Center
title_full_unstemmed Battery Ingestion in Children, an Ongoing Challenge: Recent Experience of a Tertiary Center
title_short Battery Ingestion in Children, an Ongoing Challenge: Recent Experience of a Tertiary Center
title_sort battery ingestion in children, an ongoing challenge: recent experience of a tertiary center
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9091558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.848092
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzocristina batteryingestioninchildrenanongoingchallengerecentexperienceofatertiarycenter
AT azevedosara batteryingestioninchildrenanongoingchallengerecentexperienceofatertiarycenter
AT lopesjoao batteryingestioninchildrenanongoingchallengerecentexperienceofatertiarycenter
AT fernandesana batteryingestioninchildrenanongoingchallengerecentexperienceofatertiarycenter
AT loretohelena batteryingestioninchildrenanongoingchallengerecentexperienceofatertiarycenter
AT mouratopaula batteryingestioninchildrenanongoingchallengerecentexperienceofatertiarycenter
AT lopesanaisabel batteryingestioninchildrenanongoingchallengerecentexperienceofatertiarycenter