Cargando…

Clinical outcomes after refixation of subacute repaired distal biceps tendon ruptures

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and complication spectrum after delayed repair surgery of distal biceps tendon ruptures, postulating that satisfactory results are possible contrary to previous literature. METHODS: Forty-three of 92 patients with a full workup (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thiele, Kathi, König, Laura, Kerschbaum, Maximilian, Hedgecock, Jon, Paksoy, Alp, Scheibel, Markus, Gerhardt, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9091753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35572446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.12.004
_version_ 1784704998087589888
author Thiele, Kathi
König, Laura
Kerschbaum, Maximilian
Hedgecock, Jon
Paksoy, Alp
Scheibel, Markus
Gerhardt, Christian
author_facet Thiele, Kathi
König, Laura
Kerschbaum, Maximilian
Hedgecock, Jon
Paksoy, Alp
Scheibel, Markus
Gerhardt, Christian
author_sort Thiele, Kathi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and complication spectrum after delayed repair surgery of distal biceps tendon ruptures, postulating that satisfactory results are possible contrary to previous literature. METHODS: Forty-three of 92 patients with a full workup (= OPT in) undergoing primary distal biceps tendon repair were included in this study. The mean age of participants was 49.5 years (range = 22-66 years). This cohort was divided into two groups: patients undergoing acute repair (<21 days = AR group) and a group with delayed intervention (>21 days = SR group). Beside clinical evaluation, functional scores and detection of heterotopic ossification were documented. Strength of flexion and supination were measured using a BIODEX multipoint system. In addition, thirty-one patients were included only in the evaluation of complications in the absence of consent for clinical examination (= OPT out). RESULTS: Concerning the OPT-in group, twenty-eight patients (ø age = 48.9 years; 22-63 years) received acute repair after an average of 9.2 ± 3.7 days. On the contrary, 15 patients (ø age = 50.5 years; 32-66 years) were treated with a delay after an average of 31.4 ± 10.4 days. Regarding patient-reported outcome measures, conflicting results emerge (AR/SR: Subjective Elbow Value = 87/80%, P > .05; Mayo score = 96/93 pts, P > .05; the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score = 6/13 pts, P < .05; and Oxford Elbow Score = 44/39 pts, P < .05). The main complication is the paresthesia of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, which occurs more in the group of delayed repair (AR: 21.0%, SR 31.8%). Forty-one percentage of patients in the SR group described pain in the elbow with exertion in contrast to 17.3% in the AR group. In terms of elbow strength, no significant difference in the AR or SR group compared with the contralateral side could be observed. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that delayed repair of distal biceps ruptures beyond 3 weeks may result in satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, exertional pain and paresthesia of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve may diminish results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9091753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90917532022-05-12 Clinical outcomes after refixation of subacute repaired distal biceps tendon ruptures Thiele, Kathi König, Laura Kerschbaum, Maximilian Hedgecock, Jon Paksoy, Alp Scheibel, Markus Gerhardt, Christian JSES Int Elbow BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and complication spectrum after delayed repair surgery of distal biceps tendon ruptures, postulating that satisfactory results are possible contrary to previous literature. METHODS: Forty-three of 92 patients with a full workup (= OPT in) undergoing primary distal biceps tendon repair were included in this study. The mean age of participants was 49.5 years (range = 22-66 years). This cohort was divided into two groups: patients undergoing acute repair (<21 days = AR group) and a group with delayed intervention (>21 days = SR group). Beside clinical evaluation, functional scores and detection of heterotopic ossification were documented. Strength of flexion and supination were measured using a BIODEX multipoint system. In addition, thirty-one patients were included only in the evaluation of complications in the absence of consent for clinical examination (= OPT out). RESULTS: Concerning the OPT-in group, twenty-eight patients (ø age = 48.9 years; 22-63 years) received acute repair after an average of 9.2 ± 3.7 days. On the contrary, 15 patients (ø age = 50.5 years; 32-66 years) were treated with a delay after an average of 31.4 ± 10.4 days. Regarding patient-reported outcome measures, conflicting results emerge (AR/SR: Subjective Elbow Value = 87/80%, P > .05; Mayo score = 96/93 pts, P > .05; the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score = 6/13 pts, P < .05; and Oxford Elbow Score = 44/39 pts, P < .05). The main complication is the paresthesia of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, which occurs more in the group of delayed repair (AR: 21.0%, SR 31.8%). Forty-one percentage of patients in the SR group described pain in the elbow with exertion in contrast to 17.3% in the AR group. In terms of elbow strength, no significant difference in the AR or SR group compared with the contralateral side could be observed. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that delayed repair of distal biceps ruptures beyond 3 weeks may result in satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, exertional pain and paresthesia of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve may diminish results. Elsevier 2022-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9091753/ /pubmed/35572446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.12.004 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Elbow
Thiele, Kathi
König, Laura
Kerschbaum, Maximilian
Hedgecock, Jon
Paksoy, Alp
Scheibel, Markus
Gerhardt, Christian
Clinical outcomes after refixation of subacute repaired distal biceps tendon ruptures
title Clinical outcomes after refixation of subacute repaired distal biceps tendon ruptures
title_full Clinical outcomes after refixation of subacute repaired distal biceps tendon ruptures
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes after refixation of subacute repaired distal biceps tendon ruptures
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes after refixation of subacute repaired distal biceps tendon ruptures
title_short Clinical outcomes after refixation of subacute repaired distal biceps tendon ruptures
title_sort clinical outcomes after refixation of subacute repaired distal biceps tendon ruptures
topic Elbow
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9091753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35572446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.12.004
work_keys_str_mv AT thielekathi clinicaloutcomesafterrefixationofsubacuterepaireddistalbicepstendonruptures
AT koniglaura clinicaloutcomesafterrefixationofsubacuterepaireddistalbicepstendonruptures
AT kerschbaummaximilian clinicaloutcomesafterrefixationofsubacuterepaireddistalbicepstendonruptures
AT hedgecockjon clinicaloutcomesafterrefixationofsubacuterepaireddistalbicepstendonruptures
AT paksoyalp clinicaloutcomesafterrefixationofsubacuterepaireddistalbicepstendonruptures
AT scheibelmarkus clinicaloutcomesafterrefixationofsubacuterepaireddistalbicepstendonruptures
AT gerhardtchristian clinicaloutcomesafterrefixationofsubacuterepaireddistalbicepstendonruptures