Cargando…

How is recovery defined and measured in patients with low back pain? Protocol for a mixed study systematic review

INTRODUCTION: This protocol describes the methods for a mixed study systematic review aiming to explore the definitions and measurements of recovery in patients with low back pain, and how perspectives of recovery differ between patients and providers. This review will be the first to review the con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lukacs, Michael J, Kowalski, Katie L, Peters, Nicole, Stanley, Meagan, Rushton, Alison B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9092166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35537787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061475
_version_ 1784705084968402944
author Lukacs, Michael J
Kowalski, Katie L
Peters, Nicole
Stanley, Meagan
Rushton, Alison B
author_facet Lukacs, Michael J
Kowalski, Katie L
Peters, Nicole
Stanley, Meagan
Rushton, Alison B
author_sort Lukacs, Michael J
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This protocol describes the methods for a mixed study systematic review aiming to explore the definitions and measurements of recovery in patients with low back pain, and how perspectives of recovery differ between patients and providers. This review will be the first to review the concept of recovery in patients with low back pain across both quantitative and qualitative literature. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol has been designed and reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. The following databases will be electronically searched from database inception until 30 November 2021: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, PEDro. Grey literature will be searched for through targeted searching of ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and handsearching of the references of all included studies. Studies will be included if they include a patient population of >50% with low back pain (with or without leg pain), and mention the concept of recovery within the abstract, methods or results. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will be used for quality assessment of both quantitative and qualitative included studies. Two independent reviewers will conduct the search, screen titles/abstracts and extract relevant data from full texts. Discrepancies between reviewers will be settled by a third reviewer with spinal pain expertise. For syntheses, thematic analysis will be used to analyse both qualitative and quantitative investigations to explore meanings, measurement and perspectives of recovery from a diverse evidence base. There is no clinical trial associated with this protocol. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: There are no ethical issues associated with this systematic review, and ethics approval was not required. Once completed, the results of this review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal within the realm of spinal pain to help guide future research inquiries. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022295804.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9092166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90921662022-05-27 How is recovery defined and measured in patients with low back pain? Protocol for a mixed study systematic review Lukacs, Michael J Kowalski, Katie L Peters, Nicole Stanley, Meagan Rushton, Alison B BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: This protocol describes the methods for a mixed study systematic review aiming to explore the definitions and measurements of recovery in patients with low back pain, and how perspectives of recovery differ between patients and providers. This review will be the first to review the concept of recovery in patients with low back pain across both quantitative and qualitative literature. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol has been designed and reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. The following databases will be electronically searched from database inception until 30 November 2021: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, PEDro. Grey literature will be searched for through targeted searching of ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and handsearching of the references of all included studies. Studies will be included if they include a patient population of >50% with low back pain (with or without leg pain), and mention the concept of recovery within the abstract, methods or results. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will be used for quality assessment of both quantitative and qualitative included studies. Two independent reviewers will conduct the search, screen titles/abstracts and extract relevant data from full texts. Discrepancies between reviewers will be settled by a third reviewer with spinal pain expertise. For syntheses, thematic analysis will be used to analyse both qualitative and quantitative investigations to explore meanings, measurement and perspectives of recovery from a diverse evidence base. There is no clinical trial associated with this protocol. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: There are no ethical issues associated with this systematic review, and ethics approval was not required. Once completed, the results of this review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal within the realm of spinal pain to help guide future research inquiries. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022295804. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9092166/ /pubmed/35537787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061475 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Lukacs, Michael J
Kowalski, Katie L
Peters, Nicole
Stanley, Meagan
Rushton, Alison B
How is recovery defined and measured in patients with low back pain? Protocol for a mixed study systematic review
title How is recovery defined and measured in patients with low back pain? Protocol for a mixed study systematic review
title_full How is recovery defined and measured in patients with low back pain? Protocol for a mixed study systematic review
title_fullStr How is recovery defined and measured in patients with low back pain? Protocol for a mixed study systematic review
title_full_unstemmed How is recovery defined and measured in patients with low back pain? Protocol for a mixed study systematic review
title_short How is recovery defined and measured in patients with low back pain? Protocol for a mixed study systematic review
title_sort how is recovery defined and measured in patients with low back pain? protocol for a mixed study systematic review
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9092166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35537787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061475
work_keys_str_mv AT lukacsmichaelj howisrecoverydefinedandmeasuredinpatientswithlowbackpainprotocolforamixedstudysystematicreview
AT kowalskikatiel howisrecoverydefinedandmeasuredinpatientswithlowbackpainprotocolforamixedstudysystematicreview
AT petersnicole howisrecoverydefinedandmeasuredinpatientswithlowbackpainprotocolforamixedstudysystematicreview
AT stanleymeagan howisrecoverydefinedandmeasuredinpatientswithlowbackpainprotocolforamixedstudysystematicreview
AT rushtonalisonb howisrecoverydefinedandmeasuredinpatientswithlowbackpainprotocolforamixedstudysystematicreview