Cargando…

Association Between Surgery Preference and Receipt in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ After Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ancillary Study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112)

IMPORTANCE: Guiding treatment decisions for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) requires understanding patient preferences and the influence of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgeon recommendation. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with surgery preference and surge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fazeli, Soudabeh, Snyder, Bradley S., Gareen, Ilana F., Lehman, Constance D., Khan, Seema A., Romanoff, Justin, Gatsonis, Constantine A., Corsetti, Ralph L., Rahbar, Habib, Spell, Derrick W., Blankstein, Kenneth B., Han, Linda K., Sabol, Jennifer L., Bumberry, John R., Miller, Kathy D., Sparano, Joseph A., Comstock, Christopher E., Wagner, Lynne I., Carlos, Ruth C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9092204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10331
_version_ 1784705093056069632
author Fazeli, Soudabeh
Snyder, Bradley S.
Gareen, Ilana F.
Lehman, Constance D.
Khan, Seema A.
Romanoff, Justin
Gatsonis, Constantine A.
Corsetti, Ralph L.
Rahbar, Habib
Spell, Derrick W.
Blankstein, Kenneth B.
Han, Linda K.
Sabol, Jennifer L.
Bumberry, John R.
Miller, Kathy D.
Sparano, Joseph A.
Comstock, Christopher E.
Wagner, Lynne I.
Carlos, Ruth C.
author_facet Fazeli, Soudabeh
Snyder, Bradley S.
Gareen, Ilana F.
Lehman, Constance D.
Khan, Seema A.
Romanoff, Justin
Gatsonis, Constantine A.
Corsetti, Ralph L.
Rahbar, Habib
Spell, Derrick W.
Blankstein, Kenneth B.
Han, Linda K.
Sabol, Jennifer L.
Bumberry, John R.
Miller, Kathy D.
Sparano, Joseph A.
Comstock, Christopher E.
Wagner, Lynne I.
Carlos, Ruth C.
author_sort Fazeli, Soudabeh
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Guiding treatment decisions for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) requires understanding patient preferences and the influence of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgeon recommendation. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with surgery preference and surgery receipt among a prospective cohort of women with newly diagnosed DCIS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective cohort study was conducted at 75 participating institutions, including community practices and academic centers, across the US between March 25, 2015, and April 27, 2016. Data were analyzed from August 2 to September 24, 2021. This was an ancillary study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112). Women with recently diagnosed unilateral DCIS who were eligible for wide local excision and had a diagnostic mammogram within 3 months of study registration were included. Participants who had documented surgery and completed the baseline patient-reported outcome questionnaires were included in this substudy. EXPOSURES: Women received preoperative MRI and surgeon consultation and then underwent wide local excision or mastectomy. Participants will be followed up for recurrence and overall survival for 10 years from the date of surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patient-reported outcome questionnaires assessed treatment goals and concerns and surgery preference before MRI and after MRI and surgeon consultation. RESULTS: Of the 368 participants enrolled 316 (86%) were included in this substudy (median [range] age, 59.5 [34-87] years; 45 women [14%] were Black; 245 [78%] were White; and 26 [8%] were of other race). Pre-MRI, age (odds ratio [OR] per 5-year increment, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.80; P = .007) and the importance of keeping one’s breast (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.31-0.72; P < .001) vs removal of the breast for peace of mind (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.04-1.76; P = .03) were associated with surgery preference for mastectomy. After MRI and surgeon consultation, MRI upstaging (48 of 316 [15%]) was associated with patient preference for mastectomy (OR, 8.09; 95% CI, 2.51-26.06; P < .001). The 2 variables with the highest ORs for initial receipt of mastectomy were MRI upstaging (OR, 12.08; 95% CI, 4.34-33.61; P < .001) and surgeon recommendation (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 1.99-11.83; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, change in patient preference for DCIS surgery and surgery received were responsive to MRI results and surgeon recommendation. These data highlight the importance of ensuring adequate information and ongoing communication about the clinical significance of MRI findings and the benefits and risks of available treatment options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9092204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90922042022-05-27 Association Between Surgery Preference and Receipt in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ After Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ancillary Study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112) Fazeli, Soudabeh Snyder, Bradley S. Gareen, Ilana F. Lehman, Constance D. Khan, Seema A. Romanoff, Justin Gatsonis, Constantine A. Corsetti, Ralph L. Rahbar, Habib Spell, Derrick W. Blankstein, Kenneth B. Han, Linda K. Sabol, Jennifer L. Bumberry, John R. Miller, Kathy D. Sparano, Joseph A. Comstock, Christopher E. Wagner, Lynne I. Carlos, Ruth C. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Guiding treatment decisions for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) requires understanding patient preferences and the influence of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgeon recommendation. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with surgery preference and surgery receipt among a prospective cohort of women with newly diagnosed DCIS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective cohort study was conducted at 75 participating institutions, including community practices and academic centers, across the US between March 25, 2015, and April 27, 2016. Data were analyzed from August 2 to September 24, 2021. This was an ancillary study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112). Women with recently diagnosed unilateral DCIS who were eligible for wide local excision and had a diagnostic mammogram within 3 months of study registration were included. Participants who had documented surgery and completed the baseline patient-reported outcome questionnaires were included in this substudy. EXPOSURES: Women received preoperative MRI and surgeon consultation and then underwent wide local excision or mastectomy. Participants will be followed up for recurrence and overall survival for 10 years from the date of surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patient-reported outcome questionnaires assessed treatment goals and concerns and surgery preference before MRI and after MRI and surgeon consultation. RESULTS: Of the 368 participants enrolled 316 (86%) were included in this substudy (median [range] age, 59.5 [34-87] years; 45 women [14%] were Black; 245 [78%] were White; and 26 [8%] were of other race). Pre-MRI, age (odds ratio [OR] per 5-year increment, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.80; P = .007) and the importance of keeping one’s breast (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.31-0.72; P < .001) vs removal of the breast for peace of mind (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.04-1.76; P = .03) were associated with surgery preference for mastectomy. After MRI and surgeon consultation, MRI upstaging (48 of 316 [15%]) was associated with patient preference for mastectomy (OR, 8.09; 95% CI, 2.51-26.06; P < .001). The 2 variables with the highest ORs for initial receipt of mastectomy were MRI upstaging (OR, 12.08; 95% CI, 4.34-33.61; P < .001) and surgeon recommendation (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 1.99-11.83; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, change in patient preference for DCIS surgery and surgery received were responsive to MRI results and surgeon recommendation. These data highlight the importance of ensuring adequate information and ongoing communication about the clinical significance of MRI findings and the benefits and risks of available treatment options. American Medical Association 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9092204/ /pubmed/35536580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10331 Text en Copyright 2022 Fazeli S et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Fazeli, Soudabeh
Snyder, Bradley S.
Gareen, Ilana F.
Lehman, Constance D.
Khan, Seema A.
Romanoff, Justin
Gatsonis, Constantine A.
Corsetti, Ralph L.
Rahbar, Habib
Spell, Derrick W.
Blankstein, Kenneth B.
Han, Linda K.
Sabol, Jennifer L.
Bumberry, John R.
Miller, Kathy D.
Sparano, Joseph A.
Comstock, Christopher E.
Wagner, Lynne I.
Carlos, Ruth C.
Association Between Surgery Preference and Receipt in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ After Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ancillary Study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112)
title Association Between Surgery Preference and Receipt in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ After Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ancillary Study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112)
title_full Association Between Surgery Preference and Receipt in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ After Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ancillary Study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112)
title_fullStr Association Between Surgery Preference and Receipt in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ After Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ancillary Study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112)
title_full_unstemmed Association Between Surgery Preference and Receipt in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ After Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ancillary Study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112)
title_short Association Between Surgery Preference and Receipt in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ After Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ancillary Study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112)
title_sort association between surgery preference and receipt in ductal carcinoma in situ after breast magnetic resonance imaging: an ancillary study of the ecog-acrin cancer research group (e4112)
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9092204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10331
work_keys_str_mv AT fazelisoudabeh associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT snyderbradleys associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT gareenilanaf associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT lehmanconstanced associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT khanseemaa associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT romanoffjustin associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT gatsonisconstantinea associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT corsettiralphl associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT rahbarhabib associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT spellderrickw associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT blanksteinkennethb associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT hanlindak associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT saboljenniferl associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT bumberryjohnr associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT millerkathyd associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT sparanojosepha associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT comstockchristophere associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT wagnerlynnei associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112
AT carlosruthc associationbetweensurgerypreferenceandreceiptinductalcarcinomainsituafterbreastmagneticresonanceimaginganancillarystudyoftheecogacrincancerresearchgroupe4112