Cargando…

Adoption of a Postoperative Pain Self-Report Tool: Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND: With electronic technologies, patients are provided with tools to easily acquire information and to manage and record their own health status. eHealth interventions are already broadly applied to perioperative care. In a similar way, we aimed to utilize a smartphone application to enable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thiel, Bram, Iao, Inez, Smid, Joris, de Wit, Emmy, Koopman, Seppe, Geerts, Bart, Godfried, Marc, Kalkman, Cor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9092239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35471472
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/33706
_version_ 1784705100449579008
author Thiel, Bram
Iao, Inez
Smid, Joris
de Wit, Emmy
Koopman, Seppe
Geerts, Bart
Godfried, Marc
Kalkman, Cor
author_facet Thiel, Bram
Iao, Inez
Smid, Joris
de Wit, Emmy
Koopman, Seppe
Geerts, Bart
Godfried, Marc
Kalkman, Cor
author_sort Thiel, Bram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With electronic technologies, patients are provided with tools to easily acquire information and to manage and record their own health status. eHealth interventions are already broadly applied to perioperative care. In a similar way, we aimed to utilize a smartphone application to enable postoperative patients to partially self-manage their postoperative pain. The results of a previously performed proof-of-concept study regarding the application were promising, and nurses as well as patients were optimistic regarding this innovative mobile application. Nevertheless, in reality, it appears that the usage and overall implementation of this application have stagnated since its introduction. Problems with innovation adoption are not novel; various studies have been conducted to explore the reasons for low implementation success of eHealth applications and indicated that adoption is influenced by multiple organizational factors. This study investigated the influence of these organizational factors on the adoption process, aiming to provide more insight in the dos and don’ts for implementing eHealth in the working processes of hospital care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide insight in how to successfully implement a technological eHealth innovation in a general nonacademic hospital. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted to explore organizational factors affecting the innovation adoption process. Data were collected by conducting semistructured one-on-one interviews with 11 stakeholders. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis identifying overarching themes. RESULTS: Absorptive capacity, referred to as an organization’s dynamic capability pertaining to knowledge creation and utilization that enhances an organization’s ability to gain and sustain a competitive advantage, was regarded as the most influential factor on the application’s adoption. Accordingly, it appeared that innovation adoption is mainly determined by the capability and willingness to assimilate and transform new information into productive use and the ability to absorb a novel innovation. Absorptive capacity was found to be influenced by the innovation’s benefit and the sense of ownership and responsibility. Organizational readiness and management support were also regarded as essential since absorptive capacity seemed to be mediated by these factors. The size of the hospital influenced eHealth adoption by the amount of resources available and by its organizational structure. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, absorptive capacity is essential for eHealth adoption, and it is mediated by management support and organizational readiness. It is recommended to increase the degree of willingness and ability to adopt an eHealth innovation by enhancing the relevance, engaging stakeholders, and assigning appropriate leaders to offer guidance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9092239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90922392022-05-12 Adoption of a Postoperative Pain Self-Report Tool: Qualitative Study Thiel, Bram Iao, Inez Smid, Joris de Wit, Emmy Koopman, Seppe Geerts, Bart Godfried, Marc Kalkman, Cor JMIR Hum Factors Original Paper BACKGROUND: With electronic technologies, patients are provided with tools to easily acquire information and to manage and record their own health status. eHealth interventions are already broadly applied to perioperative care. In a similar way, we aimed to utilize a smartphone application to enable postoperative patients to partially self-manage their postoperative pain. The results of a previously performed proof-of-concept study regarding the application were promising, and nurses as well as patients were optimistic regarding this innovative mobile application. Nevertheless, in reality, it appears that the usage and overall implementation of this application have stagnated since its introduction. Problems with innovation adoption are not novel; various studies have been conducted to explore the reasons for low implementation success of eHealth applications and indicated that adoption is influenced by multiple organizational factors. This study investigated the influence of these organizational factors on the adoption process, aiming to provide more insight in the dos and don’ts for implementing eHealth in the working processes of hospital care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide insight in how to successfully implement a technological eHealth innovation in a general nonacademic hospital. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted to explore organizational factors affecting the innovation adoption process. Data were collected by conducting semistructured one-on-one interviews with 11 stakeholders. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis identifying overarching themes. RESULTS: Absorptive capacity, referred to as an organization’s dynamic capability pertaining to knowledge creation and utilization that enhances an organization’s ability to gain and sustain a competitive advantage, was regarded as the most influential factor on the application’s adoption. Accordingly, it appeared that innovation adoption is mainly determined by the capability and willingness to assimilate and transform new information into productive use and the ability to absorb a novel innovation. Absorptive capacity was found to be influenced by the innovation’s benefit and the sense of ownership and responsibility. Organizational readiness and management support were also regarded as essential since absorptive capacity seemed to be mediated by these factors. The size of the hospital influenced eHealth adoption by the amount of resources available and by its organizational structure. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, absorptive capacity is essential for eHealth adoption, and it is mediated by management support and organizational readiness. It is recommended to increase the degree of willingness and ability to adopt an eHealth innovation by enhancing the relevance, engaging stakeholders, and assigning appropriate leaders to offer guidance. JMIR Publications 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9092239/ /pubmed/35471472 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/33706 Text en ©Bram Thiel, Inez Iao, Joris Smid, Emmy de Wit, Seppe Koopman, Bart Geerts, Marc Godfried, Cor Kalkman. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 26.04.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Human Factors, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://humanfactors.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Thiel, Bram
Iao, Inez
Smid, Joris
de Wit, Emmy
Koopman, Seppe
Geerts, Bart
Godfried, Marc
Kalkman, Cor
Adoption of a Postoperative Pain Self-Report Tool: Qualitative Study
title Adoption of a Postoperative Pain Self-Report Tool: Qualitative Study
title_full Adoption of a Postoperative Pain Self-Report Tool: Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Adoption of a Postoperative Pain Self-Report Tool: Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Adoption of a Postoperative Pain Self-Report Tool: Qualitative Study
title_short Adoption of a Postoperative Pain Self-Report Tool: Qualitative Study
title_sort adoption of a postoperative pain self-report tool: qualitative study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9092239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35471472
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/33706
work_keys_str_mv AT thielbram adoptionofapostoperativepainselfreporttoolqualitativestudy
AT iaoinez adoptionofapostoperativepainselfreporttoolqualitativestudy
AT smidjoris adoptionofapostoperativepainselfreporttoolqualitativestudy
AT dewitemmy adoptionofapostoperativepainselfreporttoolqualitativestudy
AT koopmanseppe adoptionofapostoperativepainselfreporttoolqualitativestudy
AT geertsbart adoptionofapostoperativepainselfreporttoolqualitativestudy
AT godfriedmarc adoptionofapostoperativepainselfreporttoolqualitativestudy
AT kalkmancor adoptionofapostoperativepainselfreporttoolqualitativestudy