Cargando…
The effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for people with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: About two thirds of people with chronic pain report problems sleeping. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for improving sleep in people with chronic pain. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of non-pharmacological and non-invasive interv...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9092772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35546397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05318-5 |
_version_ | 1784705198208319488 |
---|---|
author | Whale, Katie Dennis, Jane Wylde, Vikki Beswick, Andrew Gooberman-Hill, Rachael |
author_facet | Whale, Katie Dennis, Jane Wylde, Vikki Beswick, Andrew Gooberman-Hill, Rachael |
author_sort | Whale, Katie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: About two thirds of people with chronic pain report problems sleeping. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for improving sleep in people with chronic pain. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of non-pharmacological and non-invasive interventions to improve sleep quality or duration for adults with chronic non-cancer pain evaluated in a randomised controlled trial. Our primary outcome of interest was sleep; secondary outcomes included pain, health-related quality of life, and psychological wellbeing. We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL from inception to April 2020. After screening, two reviewers evaluated articles and extracted data. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool. RESULTS: We included 42 trials involving 3346 people randomised to 94 groups, of which 56 received an intervention targeting sleep. 10 studies were of fair and 32 of good methodological quality. Overall risk of bias was judged to be low in 11, high in 10 and unclear in 21 studies. In 9 studies with 385 people randomised, cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia showed benefit post-treatment compared with controls for improved sleep quality, standardised mean difference − 1.23 (95%CI -1.76, − 0.70; p < 0.00001). The effect size was only slightly reduced in meta-analysis of 3 studies at low risk of bias. The difference between groups was lower at 3 and 6 months after treatment but still favoured cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia. Pain, anxiety and depression were reduced post-treatment, but evidence of longer term benefit was lacking. There was no evidence that sleep hygiene interventions were effective in improving sleep and there was some evidence in comparative studies to suggest that cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia was more effective than sleep hygiene. Numerous other interventions were evaluated in small numbers of studies, but evidence was insufficient to draw conclusions about effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia is an effective treatment to improve sleep for people with chronic pain, but further high-quality primary research is required to explore combined CBT content that will ensure additional improvements to pain, quality of life and psychological health and longer-term maintenance of benefits. Primary research is also needed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for which insufficient evidence exists. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019093799. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05318-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9092772 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90927722022-05-12 The effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for people with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis Whale, Katie Dennis, Jane Wylde, Vikki Beswick, Andrew Gooberman-Hill, Rachael BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research OBJECTIVE: About two thirds of people with chronic pain report problems sleeping. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for improving sleep in people with chronic pain. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of non-pharmacological and non-invasive interventions to improve sleep quality or duration for adults with chronic non-cancer pain evaluated in a randomised controlled trial. Our primary outcome of interest was sleep; secondary outcomes included pain, health-related quality of life, and psychological wellbeing. We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL from inception to April 2020. After screening, two reviewers evaluated articles and extracted data. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool. RESULTS: We included 42 trials involving 3346 people randomised to 94 groups, of which 56 received an intervention targeting sleep. 10 studies were of fair and 32 of good methodological quality. Overall risk of bias was judged to be low in 11, high in 10 and unclear in 21 studies. In 9 studies with 385 people randomised, cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia showed benefit post-treatment compared with controls for improved sleep quality, standardised mean difference − 1.23 (95%CI -1.76, − 0.70; p < 0.00001). The effect size was only slightly reduced in meta-analysis of 3 studies at low risk of bias. The difference between groups was lower at 3 and 6 months after treatment but still favoured cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia. Pain, anxiety and depression were reduced post-treatment, but evidence of longer term benefit was lacking. There was no evidence that sleep hygiene interventions were effective in improving sleep and there was some evidence in comparative studies to suggest that cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia was more effective than sleep hygiene. Numerous other interventions were evaluated in small numbers of studies, but evidence was insufficient to draw conclusions about effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia is an effective treatment to improve sleep for people with chronic pain, but further high-quality primary research is required to explore combined CBT content that will ensure additional improvements to pain, quality of life and psychological health and longer-term maintenance of benefits. Primary research is also needed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for which insufficient evidence exists. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019093799. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05318-5. BioMed Central 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9092772/ /pubmed/35546397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05318-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Whale, Katie Dennis, Jane Wylde, Vikki Beswick, Andrew Gooberman-Hill, Rachael The effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for people with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for people with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for people with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for people with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for people with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for people with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness of non-pharmacological sleep interventions for people with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9092772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35546397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05318-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whalekatie theeffectivenessofnonpharmacologicalsleepinterventionsforpeoplewithchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dennisjane theeffectivenessofnonpharmacologicalsleepinterventionsforpeoplewithchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wyldevikki theeffectivenessofnonpharmacologicalsleepinterventionsforpeoplewithchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT beswickandrew theeffectivenessofnonpharmacologicalsleepinterventionsforpeoplewithchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT goobermanhillrachael theeffectivenessofnonpharmacologicalsleepinterventionsforpeoplewithchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT whalekatie effectivenessofnonpharmacologicalsleepinterventionsforpeoplewithchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dennisjane effectivenessofnonpharmacologicalsleepinterventionsforpeoplewithchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wyldevikki effectivenessofnonpharmacologicalsleepinterventionsforpeoplewithchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT beswickandrew effectivenessofnonpharmacologicalsleepinterventionsforpeoplewithchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT goobermanhillrachael effectivenessofnonpharmacologicalsleepinterventionsforpeoplewithchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |