Cargando…

Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND: Preserving the left colic artery (LCA) during anterior resection for rectal cancer is controversial, and robust evidence of the outcomes of LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection is lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of LCA preservation plus apic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Huichao, Li, Fan, Xie, Xingjie, Zhao, Song, Huang, Bin, Tong, Weidong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9092824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01614-y
_version_ 1784705208181325824
author Zheng, Huichao
Li, Fan
Xie, Xingjie
Zhao, Song
Huang, Bin
Tong, Weidong
author_facet Zheng, Huichao
Li, Fan
Xie, Xingjie
Zhao, Song
Huang, Bin
Tong, Weidong
author_sort Zheng, Huichao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preserving the left colic artery (LCA) during anterior resection for rectal cancer is controversial, and robust evidence of the outcomes of LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection is lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection surgery on anastomotic leakage and number of harvested lymph nodes. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic anterior resection for rectal cancer between September 2017 and May 2020 were retrospectively assessed. The patients were categorized into two groups: preservation of LCA and nonpreservation of LCA. A one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis was performed to decrease confounding. The primary outcome was anastomotic leakage within 30 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes were number of harvested lymph nodes, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year disease-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 216 patients were eligible for this study, and propensity score matching yielded 60 patients in each group. Anastomotic leakage in the LCA preservation group was significantly lower than that in the LCA nonpreservation group (3.3% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.048). No significant differences were observed in blood loss, operation time, intraoperative complications, splenic flexure mobilization, total number of harvested lymph nodes, number of positive lymph nodes, time to first flatus, or postoperative hospital stay. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed a 3-year disease-free survival of 85.7% vs. 80.5% (P = 0.738) and overall survival of 92.4% vs. 93.7% (P = 0.323) for the preservation and nonpreservation groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection surgery for rectal cancer may help reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage without impairing the number of harvested lymph nodes. Preliminary results suggest that 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates may not differ between the two types of surgery, but studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these conclusions. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03776370. Registered 14 December 2018—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9092824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90928242022-05-12 Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis Zheng, Huichao Li, Fan Xie, Xingjie Zhao, Song Huang, Bin Tong, Weidong BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: Preserving the left colic artery (LCA) during anterior resection for rectal cancer is controversial, and robust evidence of the outcomes of LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection is lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection surgery on anastomotic leakage and number of harvested lymph nodes. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic anterior resection for rectal cancer between September 2017 and May 2020 were retrospectively assessed. The patients were categorized into two groups: preservation of LCA and nonpreservation of LCA. A one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis was performed to decrease confounding. The primary outcome was anastomotic leakage within 30 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes were number of harvested lymph nodes, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year disease-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 216 patients were eligible for this study, and propensity score matching yielded 60 patients in each group. Anastomotic leakage in the LCA preservation group was significantly lower than that in the LCA nonpreservation group (3.3% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.048). No significant differences were observed in blood loss, operation time, intraoperative complications, splenic flexure mobilization, total number of harvested lymph nodes, number of positive lymph nodes, time to first flatus, or postoperative hospital stay. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed a 3-year disease-free survival of 85.7% vs. 80.5% (P = 0.738) and overall survival of 92.4% vs. 93.7% (P = 0.323) for the preservation and nonpreservation groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection surgery for rectal cancer may help reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage without impairing the number of harvested lymph nodes. Preliminary results suggest that 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates may not differ between the two types of surgery, but studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these conclusions. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03776370. Registered 14 December 2018—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov. BioMed Central 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9092824/ /pubmed/35538516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01614-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zheng, Huichao
Li, Fan
Xie, Xingjie
Zhao, Song
Huang, Bin
Tong, Weidong
Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_full Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_fullStr Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_short Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_sort preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9092824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01614-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zhenghuichao preservationversusnonpreservationoftheleftcolicarteryinanteriorresectionforrectalcancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT lifan preservationversusnonpreservationoftheleftcolicarteryinanteriorresectionforrectalcancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT xiexingjie preservationversusnonpreservationoftheleftcolicarteryinanteriorresectionforrectalcancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT zhaosong preservationversusnonpreservationoftheleftcolicarteryinanteriorresectionforrectalcancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT huangbin preservationversusnonpreservationoftheleftcolicarteryinanteriorresectionforrectalcancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT tongweidong preservationversusnonpreservationoftheleftcolicarteryinanteriorresectionforrectalcancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis