Cargando…
Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
BACKGROUND: Preserving the left colic artery (LCA) during anterior resection for rectal cancer is controversial, and robust evidence of the outcomes of LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection is lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of LCA preservation plus apic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9092824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01614-y |
_version_ | 1784705208181325824 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Huichao Li, Fan Xie, Xingjie Zhao, Song Huang, Bin Tong, Weidong |
author_facet | Zheng, Huichao Li, Fan Xie, Xingjie Zhao, Song Huang, Bin Tong, Weidong |
author_sort | Zheng, Huichao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Preserving the left colic artery (LCA) during anterior resection for rectal cancer is controversial, and robust evidence of the outcomes of LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection is lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection surgery on anastomotic leakage and number of harvested lymph nodes. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic anterior resection for rectal cancer between September 2017 and May 2020 were retrospectively assessed. The patients were categorized into two groups: preservation of LCA and nonpreservation of LCA. A one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis was performed to decrease confounding. The primary outcome was anastomotic leakage within 30 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes were number of harvested lymph nodes, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year disease-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 216 patients were eligible for this study, and propensity score matching yielded 60 patients in each group. Anastomotic leakage in the LCA preservation group was significantly lower than that in the LCA nonpreservation group (3.3% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.048). No significant differences were observed in blood loss, operation time, intraoperative complications, splenic flexure mobilization, total number of harvested lymph nodes, number of positive lymph nodes, time to first flatus, or postoperative hospital stay. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed a 3-year disease-free survival of 85.7% vs. 80.5% (P = 0.738) and overall survival of 92.4% vs. 93.7% (P = 0.323) for the preservation and nonpreservation groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection surgery for rectal cancer may help reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage without impairing the number of harvested lymph nodes. Preliminary results suggest that 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates may not differ between the two types of surgery, but studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these conclusions. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03776370. Registered 14 December 2018—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9092824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90928242022-05-12 Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis Zheng, Huichao Li, Fan Xie, Xingjie Zhao, Song Huang, Bin Tong, Weidong BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: Preserving the left colic artery (LCA) during anterior resection for rectal cancer is controversial, and robust evidence of the outcomes of LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection is lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection surgery on anastomotic leakage and number of harvested lymph nodes. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic anterior resection for rectal cancer between September 2017 and May 2020 were retrospectively assessed. The patients were categorized into two groups: preservation of LCA and nonpreservation of LCA. A one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis was performed to decrease confounding. The primary outcome was anastomotic leakage within 30 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes were number of harvested lymph nodes, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year disease-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 216 patients were eligible for this study, and propensity score matching yielded 60 patients in each group. Anastomotic leakage in the LCA preservation group was significantly lower than that in the LCA nonpreservation group (3.3% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.048). No significant differences were observed in blood loss, operation time, intraoperative complications, splenic flexure mobilization, total number of harvested lymph nodes, number of positive lymph nodes, time to first flatus, or postoperative hospital stay. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed a 3-year disease-free survival of 85.7% vs. 80.5% (P = 0.738) and overall survival of 92.4% vs. 93.7% (P = 0.323) for the preservation and nonpreservation groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection surgery for rectal cancer may help reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage without impairing the number of harvested lymph nodes. Preliminary results suggest that 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates may not differ between the two types of surgery, but studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these conclusions. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03776370. Registered 14 December 2018—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov. BioMed Central 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9092824/ /pubmed/35538516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01614-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zheng, Huichao Li, Fan Xie, Xingjie Zhao, Song Huang, Bin Tong, Weidong Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title | Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_full | Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_fullStr | Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_short | Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_sort | preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9092824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35538516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01614-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhenghuichao preservationversusnonpreservationoftheleftcolicarteryinanteriorresectionforrectalcancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT lifan preservationversusnonpreservationoftheleftcolicarteryinanteriorresectionforrectalcancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT xiexingjie preservationversusnonpreservationoftheleftcolicarteryinanteriorresectionforrectalcancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT zhaosong preservationversusnonpreservationoftheleftcolicarteryinanteriorresectionforrectalcancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT huangbin preservationversusnonpreservationoftheleftcolicarteryinanteriorresectionforrectalcancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT tongweidong preservationversusnonpreservationoftheleftcolicarteryinanteriorresectionforrectalcancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis |