Cargando…
Implantable Biomaterials for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration–Technology Trends and Translational Tribulations
The use of autografted nerve in surgical repair of peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) is severely limited due to donor site morbidity and restricted tissue availability. As an alternative, synthetic nerve guidance channels (NGCs) are available on the market for surgical nerve repair, but they fail to p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9092979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.863969 |
_version_ | 1784705241119195136 |
---|---|
author | Sanchez Rezza, Angela Kulahci, Yalcin Gorantla, Vijay S. Zor, Fatih Drzeniek, Norman M. |
author_facet | Sanchez Rezza, Angela Kulahci, Yalcin Gorantla, Vijay S. Zor, Fatih Drzeniek, Norman M. |
author_sort | Sanchez Rezza, Angela |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of autografted nerve in surgical repair of peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) is severely limited due to donor site morbidity and restricted tissue availability. As an alternative, synthetic nerve guidance channels (NGCs) are available on the market for surgical nerve repair, but they fail to promote nerve regeneration across larger critical gap nerve injuries. Therefore, such injuries remain unaddressed, result in poor healing outcomes and are a limiting factor in limb reconstruction and transplantation. On the other hand, a myriad of advanced biomaterial strategies to address critical nerve injuries are proposed in preclinical literature but only few of those have found their way into clinical practice. The design of synthetic nerve grafts should follow rational criteria and make use of a combination of bioinstructive cues to actively promote nerve regeneration. To identify the most promising NGC designs for translation into applicable products, thorough mode of action studies, standardized readouts and validation in large animals are needed. We identify design criteria for NGC fabrication according to the current state of research, give a broad overview of bioactive and functionalized biomaterials and highlight emerging composite implant strategies using therapeutic cells, soluble factors, structural features and intrinsically conductive substrates. Finally, we discuss translational progress in bioartificial conduits for nerve repair from the surgeon’s perspective and give an outlook toward future challenges in the field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9092979 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90929792022-05-12 Implantable Biomaterials for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration–Technology Trends and Translational Tribulations Sanchez Rezza, Angela Kulahci, Yalcin Gorantla, Vijay S. Zor, Fatih Drzeniek, Norman M. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology The use of autografted nerve in surgical repair of peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) is severely limited due to donor site morbidity and restricted tissue availability. As an alternative, synthetic nerve guidance channels (NGCs) are available on the market for surgical nerve repair, but they fail to promote nerve regeneration across larger critical gap nerve injuries. Therefore, such injuries remain unaddressed, result in poor healing outcomes and are a limiting factor in limb reconstruction and transplantation. On the other hand, a myriad of advanced biomaterial strategies to address critical nerve injuries are proposed in preclinical literature but only few of those have found their way into clinical practice. The design of synthetic nerve grafts should follow rational criteria and make use of a combination of bioinstructive cues to actively promote nerve regeneration. To identify the most promising NGC designs for translation into applicable products, thorough mode of action studies, standardized readouts and validation in large animals are needed. We identify design criteria for NGC fabrication according to the current state of research, give a broad overview of bioactive and functionalized biomaterials and highlight emerging composite implant strategies using therapeutic cells, soluble factors, structural features and intrinsically conductive substrates. Finally, we discuss translational progress in bioartificial conduits for nerve repair from the surgeon’s perspective and give an outlook toward future challenges in the field. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9092979/ /pubmed/35573254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.863969 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sanchez Rezza, Kulahci, Gorantla, Zor and Drzeniek. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Sanchez Rezza, Angela Kulahci, Yalcin Gorantla, Vijay S. Zor, Fatih Drzeniek, Norman M. Implantable Biomaterials for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration–Technology Trends and Translational Tribulations |
title | Implantable Biomaterials for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration–Technology Trends and Translational Tribulations |
title_full | Implantable Biomaterials for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration–Technology Trends and Translational Tribulations |
title_fullStr | Implantable Biomaterials for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration–Technology Trends and Translational Tribulations |
title_full_unstemmed | Implantable Biomaterials for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration–Technology Trends and Translational Tribulations |
title_short | Implantable Biomaterials for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration–Technology Trends and Translational Tribulations |
title_sort | implantable biomaterials for peripheral nerve regeneration–technology trends and translational tribulations |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9092979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.863969 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanchezrezzaangela implantablebiomaterialsforperipheralnerveregenerationtechnologytrendsandtranslationaltribulations AT kulahciyalcin implantablebiomaterialsforperipheralnerveregenerationtechnologytrendsandtranslationaltribulations AT gorantlavijays implantablebiomaterialsforperipheralnerveregenerationtechnologytrendsandtranslationaltribulations AT zorfatih implantablebiomaterialsforperipheralnerveregenerationtechnologytrendsandtranslationaltribulations AT drzenieknormanm implantablebiomaterialsforperipheralnerveregenerationtechnologytrendsandtranslationaltribulations |