Cargando…
Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes
BACKGROUND: The 21st Century Cures Act mandates patients’ access to their electronic health record (EHR) notes. To our knowledge, no previous work has systematically invited patients to proactively report diagnostic concerns while documenting and tracking their diagnostic experiences through EHR-bas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9093029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35348688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac036 |
_version_ | 1784705250803843072 |
---|---|
author | Giardina, Traber D Choi, Debra T Upadhyay, Divvy K Korukonda, Saritha Scott, Taylor M Spitzmueller, Christiane Schuerch, Conrad Torretti, Dennis Singh, Hardeep |
author_facet | Giardina, Traber D Choi, Debra T Upadhyay, Divvy K Korukonda, Saritha Scott, Taylor M Spitzmueller, Christiane Schuerch, Conrad Torretti, Dennis Singh, Hardeep |
author_sort | Giardina, Traber D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The 21st Century Cures Act mandates patients’ access to their electronic health record (EHR) notes. To our knowledge, no previous work has systematically invited patients to proactively report diagnostic concerns while documenting and tracking their diagnostic experiences through EHR-based clinician note review. OBJECTIVE: To test if patients can identify concerns about their diagnosis through structured evaluation of their online visit notes. METHODS: In a large integrated health system, patients aged 18–85 years actively using the patient portal and seen between October 2019 and February 2020 were invited to respond to an online questionnaire if an EHR algorithm detected any recent unexpected return visit following an initial primary care consultation (“at-risk” visit). We developed and tested an instrument (Safer Dx Patient Instrument) to help patients identify concerns related to several dimensions of the diagnostic process based on notes review and recall of recent “at-risk” visits. Additional questions assessed patients’ trust in their providers and their general feelings about the visit. The primary outcome was a self-reported diagnostic concern. Multivariate logistic regression tested whether the primary outcome was predicted by instrument variables. RESULTS: Of 293 566 visits, the algorithm identified 1282 eligible patients, of whom 486 responded. After applying exclusion criteria, 418 patients were included in the analysis. Fifty-one patients (12.2%) identified a diagnostic concern. Patients were more likely to report a concern if they disagreed with statements “the care plan the provider developed for me addressed all my medical concerns” [odds ratio (OR), 2.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45–4.87) and “I trust the provider that I saw during my visit” (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.19–3.71) and agreed with the statement “I did not have a good feeling about my visit” (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.09–2.01). CONCLUSION: Patients can identify diagnostic concerns based on a proactive online structured evaluation of visit notes. This surveillance strategy could potentially improve transparency in the diagnostic process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9093029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90930292022-05-12 Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes Giardina, Traber D Choi, Debra T Upadhyay, Divvy K Korukonda, Saritha Scott, Taylor M Spitzmueller, Christiane Schuerch, Conrad Torretti, Dennis Singh, Hardeep J Am Med Inform Assoc Research and Applications BACKGROUND: The 21st Century Cures Act mandates patients’ access to their electronic health record (EHR) notes. To our knowledge, no previous work has systematically invited patients to proactively report diagnostic concerns while documenting and tracking their diagnostic experiences through EHR-based clinician note review. OBJECTIVE: To test if patients can identify concerns about their diagnosis through structured evaluation of their online visit notes. METHODS: In a large integrated health system, patients aged 18–85 years actively using the patient portal and seen between October 2019 and February 2020 were invited to respond to an online questionnaire if an EHR algorithm detected any recent unexpected return visit following an initial primary care consultation (“at-risk” visit). We developed and tested an instrument (Safer Dx Patient Instrument) to help patients identify concerns related to several dimensions of the diagnostic process based on notes review and recall of recent “at-risk” visits. Additional questions assessed patients’ trust in their providers and their general feelings about the visit. The primary outcome was a self-reported diagnostic concern. Multivariate logistic regression tested whether the primary outcome was predicted by instrument variables. RESULTS: Of 293 566 visits, the algorithm identified 1282 eligible patients, of whom 486 responded. After applying exclusion criteria, 418 patients were included in the analysis. Fifty-one patients (12.2%) identified a diagnostic concern. Patients were more likely to report a concern if they disagreed with statements “the care plan the provider developed for me addressed all my medical concerns” [odds ratio (OR), 2.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45–4.87) and “I trust the provider that I saw during my visit” (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.19–3.71) and agreed with the statement “I did not have a good feeling about my visit” (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.09–2.01). CONCLUSION: Patients can identify diagnostic concerns based on a proactive online structured evaluation of visit notes. This surveillance strategy could potentially improve transparency in the diagnostic process. Oxford University Press 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9093029/ /pubmed/35348688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac036 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research and Applications Giardina, Traber D Choi, Debra T Upadhyay, Divvy K Korukonda, Saritha Scott, Taylor M Spitzmueller, Christiane Schuerch, Conrad Torretti, Dennis Singh, Hardeep Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes |
title | Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes |
title_full | Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes |
title_fullStr | Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes |
title_full_unstemmed | Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes |
title_short | Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes |
title_sort | inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes |
topic | Research and Applications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9093029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35348688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giardinatraberd invitingpatientstoidentifydiagnosticconcernsthroughstructuredevaluationoftheironlinevisitnotes AT choidebrat invitingpatientstoidentifydiagnosticconcernsthroughstructuredevaluationoftheironlinevisitnotes AT upadhyaydivvyk invitingpatientstoidentifydiagnosticconcernsthroughstructuredevaluationoftheironlinevisitnotes AT korukondasaritha invitingpatientstoidentifydiagnosticconcernsthroughstructuredevaluationoftheironlinevisitnotes AT scotttaylorm invitingpatientstoidentifydiagnosticconcernsthroughstructuredevaluationoftheironlinevisitnotes AT spitzmuellerchristiane invitingpatientstoidentifydiagnosticconcernsthroughstructuredevaluationoftheironlinevisitnotes AT schuerchconrad invitingpatientstoidentifydiagnosticconcernsthroughstructuredevaluationoftheironlinevisitnotes AT torrettidennis invitingpatientstoidentifydiagnosticconcernsthroughstructuredevaluationoftheironlinevisitnotes AT singhhardeep invitingpatientstoidentifydiagnosticconcernsthroughstructuredevaluationoftheironlinevisitnotes |