Cargando…

Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops

The development of new sensory and robotic technologies in recent years and the increase in the consumption of organic vegetables have allowed the generation of specific applications around precision agriculture seeking to satisfy market demand. This article analyzes the use and advantages of specif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruz Ulloa, Christyan, Krus, Anne, Barrientos, Antonio, del Cerro, Jaime, Valero, Constantino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9093594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35572379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.808484
_version_ 1784705365574680576
author Cruz Ulloa, Christyan
Krus, Anne
Barrientos, Antonio
del Cerro, Jaime
Valero, Constantino
author_facet Cruz Ulloa, Christyan
Krus, Anne
Barrientos, Antonio
del Cerro, Jaime
Valero, Constantino
author_sort Cruz Ulloa, Christyan
collection PubMed
description The development of new sensory and robotic technologies in recent years and the increase in the consumption of organic vegetables have allowed the generation of specific applications around precision agriculture seeking to satisfy market demand. This article analyzes the use and advantages of specific optical sensory systems for data acquisition and processing in precision agriculture for Robotic Fertilization process. The SUREVEG project evaluates the benefits of growing vegetables in rows, using different technological tools like sensors, embedded systems, and robots, for this purpose. A robotic platform has been developed consisting of Laser Sick AG LMS100 × 3, Multispectral, RGB sensors, and a robotic arm equipped with a fertilization system. Tests have been developed with the robotic platform in cabbage and red cabbage crops, information captured with the different sensors, allowed to reconstruct rows crops and extract information for fertilization with the robotic arm. The main advantages of each sensory have been analyzed with an quantitative comparison, based on information provided by each one; such as Normalized Difference Vegetation Index index, RGB Histograms, Point Cloud Clusters). Robot Operating System processes this information to generate trajectory planning with the robotic arm and apply the individual treatment in plants. Main results show that the vegetable characterization has been carried out with an efficiency of 93.1% using Point Cloud processing, while the vegetable detection has obtained an error of 4.6% through RGB images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9093594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90935942022-05-12 Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops Cruz Ulloa, Christyan Krus, Anne Barrientos, Antonio del Cerro, Jaime Valero, Constantino Front Robot AI Robotics and AI The development of new sensory and robotic technologies in recent years and the increase in the consumption of organic vegetables have allowed the generation of specific applications around precision agriculture seeking to satisfy market demand. This article analyzes the use and advantages of specific optical sensory systems for data acquisition and processing in precision agriculture for Robotic Fertilization process. The SUREVEG project evaluates the benefits of growing vegetables in rows, using different technological tools like sensors, embedded systems, and robots, for this purpose. A robotic platform has been developed consisting of Laser Sick AG LMS100 × 3, Multispectral, RGB sensors, and a robotic arm equipped with a fertilization system. Tests have been developed with the robotic platform in cabbage and red cabbage crops, information captured with the different sensors, allowed to reconstruct rows crops and extract information for fertilization with the robotic arm. The main advantages of each sensory have been analyzed with an quantitative comparison, based on information provided by each one; such as Normalized Difference Vegetation Index index, RGB Histograms, Point Cloud Clusters). Robot Operating System processes this information to generate trajectory planning with the robotic arm and apply the individual treatment in plants. Main results show that the vegetable characterization has been carried out with an efficiency of 93.1% using Point Cloud processing, while the vegetable detection has obtained an error of 4.6% through RGB images. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9093594/ /pubmed/35572379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.808484 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cruz Ulloa, Krus, Barrientos, del Cerro and Valero. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Robotics and AI
Cruz Ulloa, Christyan
Krus, Anne
Barrientos, Antonio
del Cerro, Jaime
Valero, Constantino
Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops
title Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops
title_full Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops
title_fullStr Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops
title_full_unstemmed Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops
title_short Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops
title_sort trend technologies for robotic fertilization process in row crops
topic Robotics and AI
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9093594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35572379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.808484
work_keys_str_mv AT cruzulloachristyan trendtechnologiesforroboticfertilizationprocessinrowcrops
AT krusanne trendtechnologiesforroboticfertilizationprocessinrowcrops
AT barrientosantonio trendtechnologiesforroboticfertilizationprocessinrowcrops
AT delcerrojaime trendtechnologiesforroboticfertilizationprocessinrowcrops
AT valeroconstantino trendtechnologiesforroboticfertilizationprocessinrowcrops