Cargando…
Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops
The development of new sensory and robotic technologies in recent years and the increase in the consumption of organic vegetables have allowed the generation of specific applications around precision agriculture seeking to satisfy market demand. This article analyzes the use and advantages of specif...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9093594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35572379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.808484 |
_version_ | 1784705365574680576 |
---|---|
author | Cruz Ulloa, Christyan Krus, Anne Barrientos, Antonio del Cerro, Jaime Valero, Constantino |
author_facet | Cruz Ulloa, Christyan Krus, Anne Barrientos, Antonio del Cerro, Jaime Valero, Constantino |
author_sort | Cruz Ulloa, Christyan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The development of new sensory and robotic technologies in recent years and the increase in the consumption of organic vegetables have allowed the generation of specific applications around precision agriculture seeking to satisfy market demand. This article analyzes the use and advantages of specific optical sensory systems for data acquisition and processing in precision agriculture for Robotic Fertilization process. The SUREVEG project evaluates the benefits of growing vegetables in rows, using different technological tools like sensors, embedded systems, and robots, for this purpose. A robotic platform has been developed consisting of Laser Sick AG LMS100 × 3, Multispectral, RGB sensors, and a robotic arm equipped with a fertilization system. Tests have been developed with the robotic platform in cabbage and red cabbage crops, information captured with the different sensors, allowed to reconstruct rows crops and extract information for fertilization with the robotic arm. The main advantages of each sensory have been analyzed with an quantitative comparison, based on information provided by each one; such as Normalized Difference Vegetation Index index, RGB Histograms, Point Cloud Clusters). Robot Operating System processes this information to generate trajectory planning with the robotic arm and apply the individual treatment in plants. Main results show that the vegetable characterization has been carried out with an efficiency of 93.1% using Point Cloud processing, while the vegetable detection has obtained an error of 4.6% through RGB images. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9093594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90935942022-05-12 Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops Cruz Ulloa, Christyan Krus, Anne Barrientos, Antonio del Cerro, Jaime Valero, Constantino Front Robot AI Robotics and AI The development of new sensory and robotic technologies in recent years and the increase in the consumption of organic vegetables have allowed the generation of specific applications around precision agriculture seeking to satisfy market demand. This article analyzes the use and advantages of specific optical sensory systems for data acquisition and processing in precision agriculture for Robotic Fertilization process. The SUREVEG project evaluates the benefits of growing vegetables in rows, using different technological tools like sensors, embedded systems, and robots, for this purpose. A robotic platform has been developed consisting of Laser Sick AG LMS100 × 3, Multispectral, RGB sensors, and a robotic arm equipped with a fertilization system. Tests have been developed with the robotic platform in cabbage and red cabbage crops, information captured with the different sensors, allowed to reconstruct rows crops and extract information for fertilization with the robotic arm. The main advantages of each sensory have been analyzed with an quantitative comparison, based on information provided by each one; such as Normalized Difference Vegetation Index index, RGB Histograms, Point Cloud Clusters). Robot Operating System processes this information to generate trajectory planning with the robotic arm and apply the individual treatment in plants. Main results show that the vegetable characterization has been carried out with an efficiency of 93.1% using Point Cloud processing, while the vegetable detection has obtained an error of 4.6% through RGB images. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9093594/ /pubmed/35572379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.808484 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cruz Ulloa, Krus, Barrientos, del Cerro and Valero. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Robotics and AI Cruz Ulloa, Christyan Krus, Anne Barrientos, Antonio del Cerro, Jaime Valero, Constantino Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops |
title | Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops |
title_full | Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops |
title_fullStr | Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops |
title_full_unstemmed | Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops |
title_short | Trend Technologies for Robotic Fertilization Process in Row Crops |
title_sort | trend technologies for robotic fertilization process in row crops |
topic | Robotics and AI |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9093594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35572379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.808484 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cruzulloachristyan trendtechnologiesforroboticfertilizationprocessinrowcrops AT krusanne trendtechnologiesforroboticfertilizationprocessinrowcrops AT barrientosantonio trendtechnologiesforroboticfertilizationprocessinrowcrops AT delcerrojaime trendtechnologiesforroboticfertilizationprocessinrowcrops AT valeroconstantino trendtechnologiesforroboticfertilizationprocessinrowcrops |