Cargando…

The impact of sensitizing 1(st) year undergraduate medical students to research methodology

BACKGROUND: Research is a core essential component of evidence-based medicine. The current study was undertaken to sensitize the undergraduate medical students the concept of biomedical research to sharpen their clinical skills. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This educational interventional study was done w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Harinder Jot, Kaur, Sharanjit, Bhatia, Kuldeep Singh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9093634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573616
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_749_21
_version_ 1784705374831509504
author Singh, Harinder Jot
Kaur, Sharanjit
Bhatia, Kuldeep Singh
author_facet Singh, Harinder Jot
Kaur, Sharanjit
Bhatia, Kuldeep Singh
author_sort Singh, Harinder Jot
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research is a core essential component of evidence-based medicine. The current study was undertaken to sensitize the undergraduate medical students the concept of biomedical research to sharpen their clinical skills. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This educational interventional study was done with a systemic random sample of 120 medical students in a tertiary care hospital. A workshop on biomedical research was conducted by the institutional ethics and medical education committee members followed by group activity regarding how to write the protocol of a research study. The protocols were then assessed using prestructured checklist by facilitators and feedback from the students and facilitators were assessed using student t-score. RESULTS: The pretest (5.86 ± 1.75) scores and posttest scores (11.82 ± 2.47) of multiple choice questions and open-ended questions showed statistically significant difference. The feedback of students showed that 49.48% of students strongly agreed that contents discussed in the workshop were adequate, 61.85% agreed about better understanding of the topics of the workshop, 60.80% agreed that their queries and doubts are cleared, 53.6% agreed that the workshop motivates them to do research, and 44.3% agreed that they will attend the similar workshops in future. The protocols submitted by groups of students using the checklist showed 26%–80% scores. CONCLUSION: The student's knowledge on research methodology was significantly improved and teaching basic research methods to medical students at an early stage motivates the student to do research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9093634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90936342022-05-12 The impact of sensitizing 1(st) year undergraduate medical students to research methodology Singh, Harinder Jot Kaur, Sharanjit Bhatia, Kuldeep Singh J Educ Health Promot Original Article BACKGROUND: Research is a core essential component of evidence-based medicine. The current study was undertaken to sensitize the undergraduate medical students the concept of biomedical research to sharpen their clinical skills. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This educational interventional study was done with a systemic random sample of 120 medical students in a tertiary care hospital. A workshop on biomedical research was conducted by the institutional ethics and medical education committee members followed by group activity regarding how to write the protocol of a research study. The protocols were then assessed using prestructured checklist by facilitators and feedback from the students and facilitators were assessed using student t-score. RESULTS: The pretest (5.86 ± 1.75) scores and posttest scores (11.82 ± 2.47) of multiple choice questions and open-ended questions showed statistically significant difference. The feedback of students showed that 49.48% of students strongly agreed that contents discussed in the workshop were adequate, 61.85% agreed about better understanding of the topics of the workshop, 60.80% agreed that their queries and doubts are cleared, 53.6% agreed that the workshop motivates them to do research, and 44.3% agreed that they will attend the similar workshops in future. The protocols submitted by groups of students using the checklist showed 26%–80% scores. CONCLUSION: The student's knowledge on research methodology was significantly improved and teaching basic research methods to medical students at an early stage motivates the student to do research. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9093634/ /pubmed/35573616 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_749_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Education and Health Promotion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Harinder Jot
Kaur, Sharanjit
Bhatia, Kuldeep Singh
The impact of sensitizing 1(st) year undergraduate medical students to research methodology
title The impact of sensitizing 1(st) year undergraduate medical students to research methodology
title_full The impact of sensitizing 1(st) year undergraduate medical students to research methodology
title_fullStr The impact of sensitizing 1(st) year undergraduate medical students to research methodology
title_full_unstemmed The impact of sensitizing 1(st) year undergraduate medical students to research methodology
title_short The impact of sensitizing 1(st) year undergraduate medical students to research methodology
title_sort impact of sensitizing 1(st) year undergraduate medical students to research methodology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9093634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573616
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_749_21
work_keys_str_mv AT singhharinderjot theimpactofsensitizing1styearundergraduatemedicalstudentstoresearchmethodology
AT kaursharanjit theimpactofsensitizing1styearundergraduatemedicalstudentstoresearchmethodology
AT bhatiakuldeepsingh theimpactofsensitizing1styearundergraduatemedicalstudentstoresearchmethodology
AT singhharinderjot impactofsensitizing1styearundergraduatemedicalstudentstoresearchmethodology
AT kaursharanjit impactofsensitizing1styearundergraduatemedicalstudentstoresearchmethodology
AT bhatiakuldeepsingh impactofsensitizing1styearundergraduatemedicalstudentstoresearchmethodology