Cargando…
Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes
Purpose: In the tazemetostat E7438-G000-101 trial of relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL), apparent superior efficacy was suggested for mutant-type (MT) EZH2 versus wild-type (WT) status. However, clinical disparities might have contributed to this conclusion. This study aimed to estim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9093865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35574216 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28229 |
_version_ | 1784705424373579776 |
---|---|
author | Proudman, David G. Gupta, Deepshekhar Nellesen, Dave Yang, Jay Kamp, Beth A. Mamlouk, Khalid Cheson, Bruce D. |
author_facet | Proudman, David G. Gupta, Deepshekhar Nellesen, Dave Yang, Jay Kamp, Beth A. Mamlouk, Khalid Cheson, Bruce D. |
author_sort | Proudman, David G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: In the tazemetostat E7438-G000-101 trial of relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL), apparent superior efficacy was suggested for mutant-type (MT) EZH2 versus wild-type (WT) status. However, clinical disparities might have contributed to this conclusion. This study aimed to estimate outcomes after minimizing differences in baseline characteristics. Methods: Propensity scores for each participant with WT (n = 54) and MT (n = 45) status were generated based on the likelihood of being selected given their baseline characteristics. Participants were matched using a 1:1 nearest-neighbor approach. Results: The propensity-matched sample included 56 participants (28 WT, 28 MT). Objective response rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 35% (22–48) in WT and 69% (55–83) in MT prior to matching and 50% (31–69) in WT and 71% (54–88) in MT after matching. Median progression-free survival values (95% CI) were 11.1 (5.4–16.7) in WT and 13.8 months (11.1–22.1) in MT prior to matching and 14.3 (11.1–∞]) and 14.8 months (10.7–∞]) in WT and MT matched groups, respectively. Conclusions: This analysis suggests that efficacy outcomes for tazemetostat observed in participants with WT EZH2 R/R FL may have been similar to those in participants with MT had the 2 cohorts been more closely matched. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9093865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90938652022-05-13 Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes Proudman, David G. Gupta, Deepshekhar Nellesen, Dave Yang, Jay Kamp, Beth A. Mamlouk, Khalid Cheson, Bruce D. Oncotarget Research Paper Purpose: In the tazemetostat E7438-G000-101 trial of relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL), apparent superior efficacy was suggested for mutant-type (MT) EZH2 versus wild-type (WT) status. However, clinical disparities might have contributed to this conclusion. This study aimed to estimate outcomes after minimizing differences in baseline characteristics. Methods: Propensity scores for each participant with WT (n = 54) and MT (n = 45) status were generated based on the likelihood of being selected given their baseline characteristics. Participants were matched using a 1:1 nearest-neighbor approach. Results: The propensity-matched sample included 56 participants (28 WT, 28 MT). Objective response rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 35% (22–48) in WT and 69% (55–83) in MT prior to matching and 50% (31–69) in WT and 71% (54–88) in MT after matching. Median progression-free survival values (95% CI) were 11.1 (5.4–16.7) in WT and 13.8 months (11.1–22.1) in MT prior to matching and 14.3 (11.1–∞]) and 14.8 months (10.7–∞]) in WT and MT matched groups, respectively. Conclusions: This analysis suggests that efficacy outcomes for tazemetostat observed in participants with WT EZH2 R/R FL may have been similar to those in participants with MT had the 2 cohorts been more closely matched. Impact Journals LLC 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9093865/ /pubmed/35574216 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28229 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Proudman et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Proudman, David G. Gupta, Deepshekhar Nellesen, Dave Yang, Jay Kamp, Beth A. Mamlouk, Khalid Cheson, Bruce D. Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes |
title | Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes |
title_full | Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes |
title_fullStr | Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes |
title_short | Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes |
title_sort | tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of e7438-g000-101 trial outcomes |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9093865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35574216 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28229 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT proudmandavidg tazemetostatinrelapsedrefractoryfollicularlymphomaapropensityscorematchedanalysisofe7438g000101trialoutcomes AT guptadeepshekhar tazemetostatinrelapsedrefractoryfollicularlymphomaapropensityscorematchedanalysisofe7438g000101trialoutcomes AT nellesendave tazemetostatinrelapsedrefractoryfollicularlymphomaapropensityscorematchedanalysisofe7438g000101trialoutcomes AT yangjay tazemetostatinrelapsedrefractoryfollicularlymphomaapropensityscorematchedanalysisofe7438g000101trialoutcomes AT kampbetha tazemetostatinrelapsedrefractoryfollicularlymphomaapropensityscorematchedanalysisofe7438g000101trialoutcomes AT mamloukkhalid tazemetostatinrelapsedrefractoryfollicularlymphomaapropensityscorematchedanalysisofe7438g000101trialoutcomes AT chesonbruced tazemetostatinrelapsedrefractoryfollicularlymphomaapropensityscorematchedanalysisofe7438g000101trialoutcomes |