Cargando…

Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes

Purpose: In the tazemetostat E7438-G000-101 trial of relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL), apparent superior efficacy was suggested for mutant-type (MT) EZH2 versus wild-type (WT) status. However, clinical disparities might have contributed to this conclusion. This study aimed to estim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Proudman, David G., Gupta, Deepshekhar, Nellesen, Dave, Yang, Jay, Kamp, Beth A., Mamlouk, Khalid, Cheson, Bruce D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9093865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35574216
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28229
_version_ 1784705424373579776
author Proudman, David G.
Gupta, Deepshekhar
Nellesen, Dave
Yang, Jay
Kamp, Beth A.
Mamlouk, Khalid
Cheson, Bruce D.
author_facet Proudman, David G.
Gupta, Deepshekhar
Nellesen, Dave
Yang, Jay
Kamp, Beth A.
Mamlouk, Khalid
Cheson, Bruce D.
author_sort Proudman, David G.
collection PubMed
description Purpose: In the tazemetostat E7438-G000-101 trial of relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL), apparent superior efficacy was suggested for mutant-type (MT) EZH2 versus wild-type (WT) status. However, clinical disparities might have contributed to this conclusion. This study aimed to estimate outcomes after minimizing differences in baseline characteristics. Methods: Propensity scores for each participant with WT (n = 54) and MT (n = 45) status were generated based on the likelihood of being selected given their baseline characteristics. Participants were matched using a 1:1 nearest-neighbor approach. Results: The propensity-matched sample included 56 participants (28 WT, 28 MT). Objective response rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 35% (22–48) in WT and 69% (55–83) in MT prior to matching and 50% (31–69) in WT and 71% (54–88) in MT after matching. Median progression-free survival values (95% CI) were 11.1 (5.4–16.7) in WT and 13.8 months (11.1–22.1) in MT prior to matching and 14.3 (11.1–∞]) and 14.8 months (10.7–∞]) in WT and MT matched groups, respectively. Conclusions: This analysis suggests that efficacy outcomes for tazemetostat observed in participants with WT EZH2 R/R FL may have been similar to those in participants with MT had the 2 cohorts been more closely matched.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9093865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90938652022-05-13 Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes Proudman, David G. Gupta, Deepshekhar Nellesen, Dave Yang, Jay Kamp, Beth A. Mamlouk, Khalid Cheson, Bruce D. Oncotarget Research Paper Purpose: In the tazemetostat E7438-G000-101 trial of relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL), apparent superior efficacy was suggested for mutant-type (MT) EZH2 versus wild-type (WT) status. However, clinical disparities might have contributed to this conclusion. This study aimed to estimate outcomes after minimizing differences in baseline characteristics. Methods: Propensity scores for each participant with WT (n = 54) and MT (n = 45) status were generated based on the likelihood of being selected given their baseline characteristics. Participants were matched using a 1:1 nearest-neighbor approach. Results: The propensity-matched sample included 56 participants (28 WT, 28 MT). Objective response rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 35% (22–48) in WT and 69% (55–83) in MT prior to matching and 50% (31–69) in WT and 71% (54–88) in MT after matching. Median progression-free survival values (95% CI) were 11.1 (5.4–16.7) in WT and 13.8 months (11.1–22.1) in MT prior to matching and 14.3 (11.1–∞]) and 14.8 months (10.7–∞]) in WT and MT matched groups, respectively. Conclusions: This analysis suggests that efficacy outcomes for tazemetostat observed in participants with WT EZH2 R/R FL may have been similar to those in participants with MT had the 2 cohorts been more closely matched. Impact Journals LLC 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9093865/ /pubmed/35574216 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28229 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Proudman et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Proudman, David G.
Gupta, Deepshekhar
Nellesen, Dave
Yang, Jay
Kamp, Beth A.
Mamlouk, Khalid
Cheson, Bruce D.
Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes
title Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes
title_full Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes
title_fullStr Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes
title_short Tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of E7438-G000-101 trial outcomes
title_sort tazemetostat in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of e7438-g000-101 trial outcomes
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9093865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35574216
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28229
work_keys_str_mv AT proudmandavidg tazemetostatinrelapsedrefractoryfollicularlymphomaapropensityscorematchedanalysisofe7438g000101trialoutcomes
AT guptadeepshekhar tazemetostatinrelapsedrefractoryfollicularlymphomaapropensityscorematchedanalysisofe7438g000101trialoutcomes
AT nellesendave tazemetostatinrelapsedrefractoryfollicularlymphomaapropensityscorematchedanalysisofe7438g000101trialoutcomes
AT yangjay tazemetostatinrelapsedrefractoryfollicularlymphomaapropensityscorematchedanalysisofe7438g000101trialoutcomes
AT kampbetha tazemetostatinrelapsedrefractoryfollicularlymphomaapropensityscorematchedanalysisofe7438g000101trialoutcomes
AT mamloukkhalid tazemetostatinrelapsedrefractoryfollicularlymphomaapropensityscorematchedanalysisofe7438g000101trialoutcomes
AT chesonbruced tazemetostatinrelapsedrefractoryfollicularlymphomaapropensityscorematchedanalysisofe7438g000101trialoutcomes