Cargando…

Trapezius Motor Evoked Potentials From Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Reference Data, Characteristic Differences and Intradural Motor Velocities in Horses

REASON FOR PERFORMING STUDY: So far, only transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEP) of the extensor carpi radialis and tibialis cranialis have been documented for diagnostic evaluation in horses. These allow for differentiating whether lesions are located in either the thoraco-lumbar region or in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Journée, Sanne Lotte, Journée, Henricus Louis, Berends, Hanneke Irene, Reed, Steven Michael, Bergmann, Wilhelmina, de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus, Delesalle, Cathérine John Ghislaine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9094044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573305
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.851463
_version_ 1784705460499120128
author Journée, Sanne Lotte
Journée, Henricus Louis
Berends, Hanneke Irene
Reed, Steven Michael
Bergmann, Wilhelmina
de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus
Delesalle, Cathérine John Ghislaine
author_facet Journée, Sanne Lotte
Journée, Henricus Louis
Berends, Hanneke Irene
Reed, Steven Michael
Bergmann, Wilhelmina
de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus
Delesalle, Cathérine John Ghislaine
author_sort Journée, Sanne Lotte
collection PubMed
description REASON FOR PERFORMING STUDY: So far, only transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEP) of the extensor carpi radialis and tibialis cranialis have been documented for diagnostic evaluation in horses. These allow for differentiating whether lesions are located in either the thoraco-lumbar region or in the cervical myelum and/or brain. Transcranial trapezius MEPs further enable to distinguish between spinal and supraspinal located lesions. No normative data are available. It is unclear whether transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are interchangeable modalities. OBJECTIVES: To provide normative data for trapezius MEP parameters in horses for TES and TMS and to discern direct and indirect conduction routes by neurophysiological models that use anatomical geometric characteristics to relate latency times with peripheral (PCV) and central conduction velocities (CCV). METHODS: Transcranial electrical stimulation-induced trapezius MEPs were obtained from twelve horses. TES and TMS-MEPs (subgroup 5 horses) were compared intra-individually. Trapezius MEPs were measured bilaterally twice at 5 intensity steps. Motoneurons were localized using nerve conduction models of the cervical and spinal accessory nerves (SAN). Predicted CCVs were verified by multifidus MEP data from two horses referred for neurophysiological assessment. RESULTS: Mean MEP latencies revealed for TES: 13.5 (11.1–16.0)ms and TMS: 19.7 (12–29.5)ms, comprising ∼100% direct routes and for TMS mixed direct/indirect routes of L:23/50; R:14/50. Left/right latency decreases over 10 > 50 V for TES were: –1.4/–1.8 ms and over 10 > 50% for TMS: –1.7/–3.5 ms. Direct route TMS-TES latency differences were 1.88–4.30 ms. 95% MEP amplitudes ranges for TES were: L:0.26–22 mV; R:0.5–15 mV and TMS: L:0.9 – 9.1 mV; R:1.1–7.9 mV. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to report normative data characterizing TES and TMS induced- trapezius MEPs in horses. The complex trapezius innervation leaves TES as the only reliable stimulation modality. Differences in latency times along the SAN route permit for estimation of the location of active motoneurons, which is of importance for clinical diagnostic purpose. SAN route lengths and latency times are governed by anatomical locations of motoneurons across C2-C5 segments. TES intensity-dependent reductions of trapezius MEP latencies are similar to limb muscles while MEP amplitudes between sides and between TES and TMS are not different. CCVs may reach 180 m/s.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9094044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90940442022-05-12 Trapezius Motor Evoked Potentials From Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Reference Data, Characteristic Differences and Intradural Motor Velocities in Horses Journée, Sanne Lotte Journée, Henricus Louis Berends, Hanneke Irene Reed, Steven Michael Bergmann, Wilhelmina de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus Delesalle, Cathérine John Ghislaine Front Neurosci Neuroscience REASON FOR PERFORMING STUDY: So far, only transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEP) of the extensor carpi radialis and tibialis cranialis have been documented for diagnostic evaluation in horses. These allow for differentiating whether lesions are located in either the thoraco-lumbar region or in the cervical myelum and/or brain. Transcranial trapezius MEPs further enable to distinguish between spinal and supraspinal located lesions. No normative data are available. It is unclear whether transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are interchangeable modalities. OBJECTIVES: To provide normative data for trapezius MEP parameters in horses for TES and TMS and to discern direct and indirect conduction routes by neurophysiological models that use anatomical geometric characteristics to relate latency times with peripheral (PCV) and central conduction velocities (CCV). METHODS: Transcranial electrical stimulation-induced trapezius MEPs were obtained from twelve horses. TES and TMS-MEPs (subgroup 5 horses) were compared intra-individually. Trapezius MEPs were measured bilaterally twice at 5 intensity steps. Motoneurons were localized using nerve conduction models of the cervical and spinal accessory nerves (SAN). Predicted CCVs were verified by multifidus MEP data from two horses referred for neurophysiological assessment. RESULTS: Mean MEP latencies revealed for TES: 13.5 (11.1–16.0)ms and TMS: 19.7 (12–29.5)ms, comprising ∼100% direct routes and for TMS mixed direct/indirect routes of L:23/50; R:14/50. Left/right latency decreases over 10 > 50 V for TES were: –1.4/–1.8 ms and over 10 > 50% for TMS: –1.7/–3.5 ms. Direct route TMS-TES latency differences were 1.88–4.30 ms. 95% MEP amplitudes ranges for TES were: L:0.26–22 mV; R:0.5–15 mV and TMS: L:0.9 – 9.1 mV; R:1.1–7.9 mV. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to report normative data characterizing TES and TMS induced- trapezius MEPs in horses. The complex trapezius innervation leaves TES as the only reliable stimulation modality. Differences in latency times along the SAN route permit for estimation of the location of active motoneurons, which is of importance for clinical diagnostic purpose. SAN route lengths and latency times are governed by anatomical locations of motoneurons across C2-C5 segments. TES intensity-dependent reductions of trapezius MEP latencies are similar to limb muscles while MEP amplitudes between sides and between TES and TMS are not different. CCVs may reach 180 m/s. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9094044/ /pubmed/35573305 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.851463 Text en Copyright © 2022 Journée, Journée, Berends, Reed, Bergmann, de Bruijn and Delesalle. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Journée, Sanne Lotte
Journée, Henricus Louis
Berends, Hanneke Irene
Reed, Steven Michael
Bergmann, Wilhelmina
de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus
Delesalle, Cathérine John Ghislaine
Trapezius Motor Evoked Potentials From Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Reference Data, Characteristic Differences and Intradural Motor Velocities in Horses
title Trapezius Motor Evoked Potentials From Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Reference Data, Characteristic Differences and Intradural Motor Velocities in Horses
title_full Trapezius Motor Evoked Potentials From Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Reference Data, Characteristic Differences and Intradural Motor Velocities in Horses
title_fullStr Trapezius Motor Evoked Potentials From Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Reference Data, Characteristic Differences and Intradural Motor Velocities in Horses
title_full_unstemmed Trapezius Motor Evoked Potentials From Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Reference Data, Characteristic Differences and Intradural Motor Velocities in Horses
title_short Trapezius Motor Evoked Potentials From Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Reference Data, Characteristic Differences and Intradural Motor Velocities in Horses
title_sort trapezius motor evoked potentials from transcranial electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation: reference data, characteristic differences and intradural motor velocities in horses
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9094044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573305
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.851463
work_keys_str_mv AT journeesannelotte trapeziusmotorevokedpotentialsfromtranscranialelectricalstimulationandtranscranialmagneticstimulationreferencedatacharacteristicdifferencesandintraduralmotorvelocitiesinhorses
AT journeehenricuslouis trapeziusmotorevokedpotentialsfromtranscranialelectricalstimulationandtranscranialmagneticstimulationreferencedatacharacteristicdifferencesandintraduralmotorvelocitiesinhorses
AT berendshannekeirene trapeziusmotorevokedpotentialsfromtranscranialelectricalstimulationandtranscranialmagneticstimulationreferencedatacharacteristicdifferencesandintraduralmotorvelocitiesinhorses
AT reedstevenmichael trapeziusmotorevokedpotentialsfromtranscranialelectricalstimulationandtranscranialmagneticstimulationreferencedatacharacteristicdifferencesandintraduralmotorvelocitiesinhorses
AT bergmannwilhelmina trapeziusmotorevokedpotentialsfromtranscranialelectricalstimulationandtranscranialmagneticstimulationreferencedatacharacteristicdifferencesandintraduralmotorvelocitiesinhorses
AT debruijncornelismarinus trapeziusmotorevokedpotentialsfromtranscranialelectricalstimulationandtranscranialmagneticstimulationreferencedatacharacteristicdifferencesandintraduralmotorvelocitiesinhorses
AT delesallecatherinejohnghislaine trapeziusmotorevokedpotentialsfromtranscranialelectricalstimulationandtranscranialmagneticstimulationreferencedatacharacteristicdifferencesandintraduralmotorvelocitiesinhorses