Cargando…
Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter?
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the size of thyroid nodules in ACR-TIRADS ultrasound categories 3 and 4 is correlated with the Bethesda cytopathology classification. METHODS: Thyroid nodules (566) subclassified as ACR-TIRADS 3 or 4 were divided into three size categories according to American Thyroi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9094606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35584446 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6747 |
_version_ | 1784705577280077824 |
---|---|
author | Sakajiri, Raissa Kitaguchi Rahal, Antonio Francisco, Miguel José de Queiroz, Marcos Roberto Gomes Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo Martins, Leandro Aurélio Liporoni Malerbi, Domingos Augusto Cherino |
author_facet | Sakajiri, Raissa Kitaguchi Rahal, Antonio Francisco, Miguel José de Queiroz, Marcos Roberto Gomes Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo Martins, Leandro Aurélio Liporoni Malerbi, Domingos Augusto Cherino |
author_sort | Sakajiri, Raissa Kitaguchi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the size of thyroid nodules in ACR-TIRADS ultrasound categories 3 and 4 is correlated with the Bethesda cytopathology classification. METHODS: Thyroid nodules (566) subclassified as ACR-TIRADS 3 or 4 were divided into three size categories according to American Thyroid Association guidelines. The frequency of different Bethesda categories in each size range within ACR-TIRADS 3 and 4 classifications was analyzed. RESULTS: Most nodules in both ACR-TIRADS classifications fell in the Bethesda 2 category, regardless of size (90.8% and 68.6%, ACR-TIRADS 3 and 4 respectively). The prevalence of Bethesda 6 nodules in the ACR-TIRADS 4 group was 14 times higher than in the ACR-TIRADS 3 group. There were no significant differences between nodule size and fine needle aspiration biopsy classification in any of the ACR-TIRADS categories. CONCLUSION: Size does not appear to be an important criterion for indication of fine needle aspiration biopsy in thyroid nodules with a high suspicion of malignancy on ultrasound examination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9094606 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90946062022-05-14 Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter? Sakajiri, Raissa Kitaguchi Rahal, Antonio Francisco, Miguel José de Queiroz, Marcos Roberto Gomes Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo Martins, Leandro Aurélio Liporoni Malerbi, Domingos Augusto Cherino Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the size of thyroid nodules in ACR-TIRADS ultrasound categories 3 and 4 is correlated with the Bethesda cytopathology classification. METHODS: Thyroid nodules (566) subclassified as ACR-TIRADS 3 or 4 were divided into three size categories according to American Thyroid Association guidelines. The frequency of different Bethesda categories in each size range within ACR-TIRADS 3 and 4 classifications was analyzed. RESULTS: Most nodules in both ACR-TIRADS classifications fell in the Bethesda 2 category, regardless of size (90.8% and 68.6%, ACR-TIRADS 3 and 4 respectively). The prevalence of Bethesda 6 nodules in the ACR-TIRADS 4 group was 14 times higher than in the ACR-TIRADS 3 group. There were no significant differences between nodule size and fine needle aspiration biopsy classification in any of the ACR-TIRADS categories. CONCLUSION: Size does not appear to be an important criterion for indication of fine needle aspiration biopsy in thyroid nodules with a high suspicion of malignancy on ultrasound examination. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9094606/ /pubmed/35584446 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6747 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sakajiri, Raissa Kitaguchi Rahal, Antonio Francisco, Miguel José de Queiroz, Marcos Roberto Gomes Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo Martins, Leandro Aurélio Liporoni Malerbi, Domingos Augusto Cherino Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter? |
title | Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter? |
title_full | Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter? |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter? |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter? |
title_short | Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter? |
title_sort | ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9094606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35584446 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6747 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sakajiriraissakitaguchi ultrasoundclassificationofthyroidnodulesdoessizematter AT rahalantonio ultrasoundclassificationofthyroidnodulesdoessizematter AT franciscomigueljose ultrasoundclassificationofthyroidnodulesdoessizematter AT dequeirozmarcosrobertogomes ultrasoundclassificationofthyroidnodulesdoessizematter AT garciarodrigogobbo ultrasoundclassificationofthyroidnodulesdoessizematter AT martinsleandroaurelioliporoni ultrasoundclassificationofthyroidnodulesdoessizematter AT malerbidomingosaugustocherino ultrasoundclassificationofthyroidnodulesdoessizematter |