Cargando…

Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the size of thyroid nodules in ACR-TIRADS ultrasound categories 3 and 4 is correlated with the Bethesda cytopathology classification. METHODS: Thyroid nodules (566) subclassified as ACR-TIRADS 3 or 4 were divided into three size categories according to American Thyroi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakajiri, Raissa Kitaguchi, Rahal, Antonio, Francisco, Miguel José, de Queiroz, Marcos Roberto Gomes, Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo, Martins, Leandro Aurélio Liporoni, Malerbi, Domingos Augusto Cherino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9094606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35584446
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6747
_version_ 1784705577280077824
author Sakajiri, Raissa Kitaguchi
Rahal, Antonio
Francisco, Miguel José
de Queiroz, Marcos Roberto Gomes
Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo
Martins, Leandro Aurélio Liporoni
Malerbi, Domingos Augusto Cherino
author_facet Sakajiri, Raissa Kitaguchi
Rahal, Antonio
Francisco, Miguel José
de Queiroz, Marcos Roberto Gomes
Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo
Martins, Leandro Aurélio Liporoni
Malerbi, Domingos Augusto Cherino
author_sort Sakajiri, Raissa Kitaguchi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the size of thyroid nodules in ACR-TIRADS ultrasound categories 3 and 4 is correlated with the Bethesda cytopathology classification. METHODS: Thyroid nodules (566) subclassified as ACR-TIRADS 3 or 4 were divided into three size categories according to American Thyroid Association guidelines. The frequency of different Bethesda categories in each size range within ACR-TIRADS 3 and 4 classifications was analyzed. RESULTS: Most nodules in both ACR-TIRADS classifications fell in the Bethesda 2 category, regardless of size (90.8% and 68.6%, ACR-TIRADS 3 and 4 respectively). The prevalence of Bethesda 6 nodules in the ACR-TIRADS 4 group was 14 times higher than in the ACR-TIRADS 3 group. There were no significant differences between nodule size and fine needle aspiration biopsy classification in any of the ACR-TIRADS categories. CONCLUSION: Size does not appear to be an important criterion for indication of fine needle aspiration biopsy in thyroid nodules with a high suspicion of malignancy on ultrasound examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9094606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90946062022-05-14 Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter? Sakajiri, Raissa Kitaguchi Rahal, Antonio Francisco, Miguel José de Queiroz, Marcos Roberto Gomes Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo Martins, Leandro Aurélio Liporoni Malerbi, Domingos Augusto Cherino Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the size of thyroid nodules in ACR-TIRADS ultrasound categories 3 and 4 is correlated with the Bethesda cytopathology classification. METHODS: Thyroid nodules (566) subclassified as ACR-TIRADS 3 or 4 were divided into three size categories according to American Thyroid Association guidelines. The frequency of different Bethesda categories in each size range within ACR-TIRADS 3 and 4 classifications was analyzed. RESULTS: Most nodules in both ACR-TIRADS classifications fell in the Bethesda 2 category, regardless of size (90.8% and 68.6%, ACR-TIRADS 3 and 4 respectively). The prevalence of Bethesda 6 nodules in the ACR-TIRADS 4 group was 14 times higher than in the ACR-TIRADS 3 group. There were no significant differences between nodule size and fine needle aspiration biopsy classification in any of the ACR-TIRADS categories. CONCLUSION: Size does not appear to be an important criterion for indication of fine needle aspiration biopsy in thyroid nodules with a high suspicion of malignancy on ultrasound examination. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9094606/ /pubmed/35584446 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6747 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sakajiri, Raissa Kitaguchi
Rahal, Antonio
Francisco, Miguel José
de Queiroz, Marcos Roberto Gomes
Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo
Martins, Leandro Aurélio Liporoni
Malerbi, Domingos Augusto Cherino
Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter?
title Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter?
title_full Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter?
title_fullStr Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter?
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter?
title_short Ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter?
title_sort ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules: does size matter?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9094606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35584446
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6747
work_keys_str_mv AT sakajiriraissakitaguchi ultrasoundclassificationofthyroidnodulesdoessizematter
AT rahalantonio ultrasoundclassificationofthyroidnodulesdoessizematter
AT franciscomigueljose ultrasoundclassificationofthyroidnodulesdoessizematter
AT dequeirozmarcosrobertogomes ultrasoundclassificationofthyroidnodulesdoessizematter
AT garciarodrigogobbo ultrasoundclassificationofthyroidnodulesdoessizematter
AT martinsleandroaurelioliporoni ultrasoundclassificationofthyroidnodulesdoessizematter
AT malerbidomingosaugustocherino ultrasoundclassificationofthyroidnodulesdoessizematter