Cargando…

Accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive value of positron emission computed tomography or magnetic resonance (PET-CT and PET-MRI) using gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ((68)Ga-PSMA) in lymph node involvement in prostate cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study comprising 91 patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbosa, Álan Roger Gomes, Amaral, Breno Santos, Lourenço, Danilo Budib, Bianco, Bianca, Gushiken, Felipe Arakaki, Apezzato, Marcelo, Silva, Júlia Francisco, da Cunha, Marcelo Livorsi, Filippi, Reneé Zon, Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb, Lemos, Gustavo Caserta, Carneiro, Arie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9094607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35584444
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6599
_version_ 1784705577514958848
author Barbosa, Álan Roger Gomes
Amaral, Breno Santos
Lourenço, Danilo Budib
Bianco, Bianca
Gushiken, Felipe Arakaki
Apezzato, Marcelo
Silva, Júlia Francisco
da Cunha, Marcelo Livorsi
Filippi, Reneé Zon
Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
Lemos, Gustavo Caserta
Carneiro, Arie
author_facet Barbosa, Álan Roger Gomes
Amaral, Breno Santos
Lourenço, Danilo Budib
Bianco, Bianca
Gushiken, Felipe Arakaki
Apezzato, Marcelo
Silva, Júlia Francisco
da Cunha, Marcelo Livorsi
Filippi, Reneé Zon
Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
Lemos, Gustavo Caserta
Carneiro, Arie
author_sort Barbosa, Álan Roger Gomes
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive value of positron emission computed tomography or magnetic resonance (PET-CT and PET-MRI) using gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ((68)Ga-PSMA) in lymph node involvement in prostate cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study comprising 91 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2016 to 2020, who underwent (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT or PET-MRI for staging before prostatectomy. The patients were divided into Group 1, with 65 patients with satisfactory pathological lymph node analysis, and Group 2, with 91 patients representing the sum of patients with pathological lymph node analysis and those with postoperative prostate-specific antigen within 60 days after surgery. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were used to assess accuracy of predictive capacity of imaging exams for lymph node involvement. RESULTS: Regarding local clinical staging, the groups showed similar results, and 50% were classified as staging T2a. The accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT for prostate cancer lymph node staging was 86.5% (95%CI 0.74-0.94; p=0.06), with a sensitivity of 58.3% and specificity of 95%. The accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET-MRI was 84.6% (95%CI 0.69-0.94; p=0.09), with a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 100%. Considering both (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI, the accuracy was 85.7% (95%CI 0.76-0.92; p=0.015), with sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 97%. CONCLUSION: The imaging tests (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI were highly accurate to detect preoperative lymph node involvement, and could be useful tools to indicate the need for extended lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9094607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90946072022-05-14 Accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer Barbosa, Álan Roger Gomes Amaral, Breno Santos Lourenço, Danilo Budib Bianco, Bianca Gushiken, Felipe Arakaki Apezzato, Marcelo Silva, Júlia Francisco da Cunha, Marcelo Livorsi Filippi, Reneé Zon Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb Lemos, Gustavo Caserta Carneiro, Arie Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive value of positron emission computed tomography or magnetic resonance (PET-CT and PET-MRI) using gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ((68)Ga-PSMA) in lymph node involvement in prostate cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study comprising 91 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2016 to 2020, who underwent (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT or PET-MRI for staging before prostatectomy. The patients were divided into Group 1, with 65 patients with satisfactory pathological lymph node analysis, and Group 2, with 91 patients representing the sum of patients with pathological lymph node analysis and those with postoperative prostate-specific antigen within 60 days after surgery. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were used to assess accuracy of predictive capacity of imaging exams for lymph node involvement. RESULTS: Regarding local clinical staging, the groups showed similar results, and 50% were classified as staging T2a. The accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT for prostate cancer lymph node staging was 86.5% (95%CI 0.74-0.94; p=0.06), with a sensitivity of 58.3% and specificity of 95%. The accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET-MRI was 84.6% (95%CI 0.69-0.94; p=0.09), with a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 100%. Considering both (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI, the accuracy was 85.7% (95%CI 0.76-0.92; p=0.015), with sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 97%. CONCLUSION: The imaging tests (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI were highly accurate to detect preoperative lymph node involvement, and could be useful tools to indicate the need for extended lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9094607/ /pubmed/35584444 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6599 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Barbosa, Álan Roger Gomes
Amaral, Breno Santos
Lourenço, Danilo Budib
Bianco, Bianca
Gushiken, Felipe Arakaki
Apezzato, Marcelo
Silva, Júlia Francisco
da Cunha, Marcelo Livorsi
Filippi, Reneé Zon
Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
Lemos, Gustavo Caserta
Carneiro, Arie
Accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer
title Accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer
title_full Accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer
title_fullStr Accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer
title_short Accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer
title_sort accuracy of (68)ga-psma pet-ct and pet-mri in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9094607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35584444
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6599
work_keys_str_mv AT barbosaalanrogergomes accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT amaralbrenosantos accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT lourencodanilobudib accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT biancobianca accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT gushikenfelipearakaki accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT apezzatomarcelo accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT silvajuliafrancisco accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT dacunhamarcelolivorsi accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT filippireneezon accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT baronironaldohueb accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT lemosgustavocaserta accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT carneiroarie accuracyof68gapsmapetctandpetmriinlymphnodestagingforlocalizedprostatecancer