Cargando…
Structured reporting to improve transparency of analyses in prognostic marker studies
BACKGROUND: Factors contributing to the lack of understanding of research studies include poor reporting practices, such as selective reporting of statistically significant findings or insufficient methodological details. Systematic reviews have shown that prognostic factor studies continue to be po...
Autores principales: | Sauerbrei, Willi, Haeussler, Tim, Balmford, James, Huebner, Marianne |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9095054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35546237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02304-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comment on ‘BAG-1 as a biomarker in early breast cancer prognosis: a systematic review with meta-analyses'
por: Sauerbrei, Willi, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Effects of influential points and sample size on the selection and replicability of multivariable fractional polynomial models
por: Sauerbrei, Willi, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Did the reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers improve since the introduction of REMARK guideline? A comparison of reporting in published articles
por: Sekula, Peggy, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration
por: Altman, Douglas G, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): Explanation and Elaboration
por: Altman, Douglas G., et al.
Publicado: (2012)